Mick F wrote:Don't vote for them. It only encourages them.
If there was a zero turnout at the next general election, what then?
If only we could persuade the rest of the country Mick,what a change may take place,however..........
Mick F wrote:Don't vote for them. It only encourages them.
If there was a zero turnout at the next general election, what then?
I think that may be irrelevant - although I'm none too hot on my history! As I understand it, the Glorious Revolution was mainly about ousting a Catholic monarch and assuring the predominance of Protestantism. Doing away with absolute monarchy and establishing a Parliamentary democracy (of sorts!) was a secondary objective. Or so I think.Mick F wrote::lol:
Revolutions have happened throughout history in many many different countries. We had a Glorious Revolution here in this sceptred isle only three hundred years ago ............. not that long ago - historically speaking.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glorious_Revolution
661-Pete wrote:I think that may be irrelevant - although I'm none too hot on my history! As I understand it, the Glorious Revolution was mainly about ousting a Catholic monarch and assuring the predominance of Protestantism. Doing away with absolute monarchy and establishing a Parliamentary democracy (of sorts!) was a secondary objective. Or so I think.Mick F wrote::lol:
Revolutions have happened throughout history in many many different countries. We had a Glorious Revolution here in this sceptred isle only three hundred years ago ............. not that long ago - historically speaking.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glorious_Revolution
Nothing much to compare with the French, American or Russian examples, anyway.
reohn2 wrote:In total a resounding NO just like all the rightwing cowboys of the past 30 odd years the rich have got richer and the poor have struggled evenmore.
Another slimeball IMHO
mercalia wrote:seems to me a load of commies here