...would immediately 'correct' my metric units into imperial.
I was once required to report water flow rates for a US project in "Acre feet per year"
I thought they were winding me up, but no, this was genuinely their standard unit.
...would immediately 'correct' my metric units into imperial.
PDQ Mobile wrote:pete75 wrote:661-Pete wrote:Have ye no scruples, man? And no rods, poles, perches, furlongs, pennyweights, drams nor firkins, neither?
I have indeed got a firkin. Picked it up today from my mate's brewery for a party at the weekend.
How many miles did you travel to fetch it!?
A sort of of alternative MPG.
661-Pete wrote:I worked for a USA-based multinational company. It used to irritate me no end, when some visiting American colleague (especially if from the 'management' tier), visiting our facility here in the UK and asking me for some technical briefing on the work I was engaged in, would immediately 'correct' my metric units into imperial. I mean - everyone in Science, Technology and Engineering understands metric - so why muddy the waters?
But then again - there's a lot of nonsensical stuff Across the Pond - as we can all see only too well. Try buying petrol (sorry: "gasoline") in litres over there...
mjr wrote:661-Pete wrote:I worked for a USA-based multinational company. It used to irritate me no end, when some visiting American colleague (especially if from the 'management' tier), visiting our facility here in the UK and asking me for some technical briefing on the work I was engaged in, would immediately 'correct' my metric units into imperial. I mean - everyone in Science, Technology and Engineering understands metric - so why muddy the waters?
But then again - there's a lot of nonsensical stuff Across the Pond - as we can all see only too well. Try buying petrol (sorry: "gasoline") in litres over there...
Try buying gasoline in gallons over there and they're smaller than UK gallons, same as USA 26" wheels are smaller than UK ones. It's a myth that everything's bigger in the USA. I don't understand why Leavers are so keen to ingratiate ourselves by adopting USA-style blue passports.
pete75 wrote:PDQ Mobile wrote:pete75 wrote:
I have indeed got a firkin. Picked it up today from my mate's brewery for a party at the weekend.
How many miles did you travel to fetch it!?
A sort of of alternative MPG.
Well none really because I was going past there anyway - but about 18 so 2 mpg.
PDQ Mobile wrote:pete75 wrote:PDQ Mobile wrote:
How many miles did you travel to fetch it!?
A sort of of alternative MPG.
Well none really because I was going past there anyway - but about 18 so 2 mpg.
Must be something special!
(I tried to be clever and find an alcohol content expressed in imperial but failed.
There may or may not be something significant in this!)
geocycle wrote:Another day and it doesn’t get any better. At least the news that the new science minister, who has a history degree and a dodgy past that involved writing songs about his willy, will fit in well in the cabinet.
1066enthalpies1939 wrote:PDQ Mobile wrote:pete75 wrote:
Well none really because I was going past there anyway - but about 18 so 2 mpg.
Must be something special!
(I tried to be clever and find an alcohol content expressed in imperial but failed.
There may or may not be something significant in this!)
This may help?
https://www.etoolsage.com/converter/Alc ... 29&Result=
https://www.disabled-world.com/calculat ... perial.php
PDQ Mobile wrote:pete75 wrote:661-Pete wrote:Have ye no scruples, man? And no rods, poles, perches, furlongs, pennyweights, drams nor firkins, neither?
I have indeed got a firkin. Picked it up today from my mate's brewery for a party at the weekend.
How many miles did you travel to fetch it!?
A sort of of alternative MPG.
Cunobelin wrote:PDQ Mobile wrote:pete75 wrote:
I have indeed got a firkin. Picked it up today from my mate's brewery for a party at the weekend.
How many miles did you travel to fetch it!?
A sort of of alternative MPG.
The obvious answer is “Too firkin far”
Sounds like the rainfall measurement for Cornwall.roubaixtuesday wrote:I was once required to report water flow rates for a US project in "Acre feet per year"
I thought they were winding me up, but no, this was genuinely their standard unit.
Mick F wrote:Sounds like the rainfall measurement for Cornwall.roubaixtuesday wrote:I was once required to report water flow rates for a US project in "Acre feet per year"
I thought they were winding me up, but no, this was genuinely their standard unit.
We have three acres on our property, and no doubt it rains a foot per year.
That's one third of an acre-foot per year.