Jess Varnish ..

Vorpal
Moderator
Posts: 17321
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 3:34pm
Location: Not there ;)

Re: Jess Varnish ..

Postby Vorpal » 17 Dec 2018, 11:47am

We should fund university for anyone wants it, and similarly do more to subsidise sport at all level.

:mrgreen: :mrgreen:

FIFY :wink:
“In some ways, it is easier to be a dissident, for then one is without responsibility.”
― Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom

User avatar
TrevA
Posts: 2172
Joined: 1 Jun 2007, 9:12pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: Jess Varnish ..

Postby TrevA » 16 Jan 2019, 10:37pm

Jess Varnish has lost her employment tribunal claiming unfair dismissal, as she has been deemed not to be an employee of British Cycling and therefore not entitled to employment rights.
A cart horse trapped in the body of a man.
http://www.jogler2009.blogspot.com

Vorpal
Moderator
Posts: 17321
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 3:34pm
Location: Not there ;)

Re: Jess Varnish ..

Postby Vorpal » 16 Jan 2019, 10:43pm

That's not especially surprising. But I hope that they employ elite athletes in the future, instead of funding them through grants.
“In some ways, it is easier to be a dissident, for then one is without responsibility.”
― Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom

landsurfer
Posts: 4998
Joined: 27 Oct 2012, 9:13pm
Location: Rotherham

Re: Jess Varnish ..

Postby landsurfer » 17 Jan 2019, 6:30am

Vorpal wrote:That's not especially surprising. But I hope that they employ elite athletes in the future, instead of funding them through grants.


Good idea, then the money won at events, appearance money and money from advertising etc. would stay in BC rather than ending up in the athletes bank account.
It's just like that, it's just the way it is.
The road goes on forever.

User avatar
pjclinch
Posts: 3787
Joined: 29 Oct 2007, 2:32pm
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Contact:

Re: Jess Varnish ..

Postby pjclinch » 17 Jan 2019, 7:51am

landsurfer wrote:
Vorpal wrote:That's not especially surprising. But I hope that they employ elite athletes in the future, instead of funding them through grants.


Good idea, then the money won at events, appearance money and money from advertising etc. would stay in BC rather than ending up in the athletes bank account.


A bit of a non-sequitur even as sarcasm because it would be down to the fine print on the contract.
Often seen riding a bike around Dundee...

Vorpal
Moderator
Posts: 17321
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 3:34pm
Location: Not there ;)

Re: Jess Varnish ..

Postby Vorpal » 17 Jan 2019, 9:32am

I'm not suggesting that they should lose prize & advertising money.
“In some ways, it is easier to be a dissident, for then one is without responsibility.”
― Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom

Marcus Aurelius
Posts: 450
Joined: 1 Feb 2018, 10:20am

Re: Jess Varnish ..

Postby Marcus Aurelius » 17 Jan 2019, 2:42pm

landsurfer wrote:
Vorpal wrote:That's not especially surprising. But I hope that they employ elite athletes in the future, instead of funding them through grants.


Good idea, then the money won at events, appearance money and money from advertising etc. would stay in BC rather than ending up in the athletes bank account.



Many a true word spoken in jest.

landsurfer
Posts: 4998
Joined: 27 Oct 2012, 9:13pm
Location: Rotherham

Re: Jess Varnish ..

Postby landsurfer » 17 Jan 2019, 3:54pm

Marcus Aurelius wrote:
landsurfer wrote:
Vorpal wrote:That's not especially surprising. But I hope that they employ elite athletes in the future, instead of funding them through grants.


Good idea, then the money won at events, appearance money and money from advertising etc. would stay in BC rather than ending up in the athletes bank account.



Many a true word spoken in jest.


That was my take. HMRC will now have these athletes on their radar and soon the bean counters will be looking closely at total income. Money won at events, appearance money and money from advertising etc. will be able to be taxed at a higher rate if the "grant" from BC becomes classed as their taxable allowance (tax free) income element. Possibly.
It's just like that, it's just the way it is.
The road goes on forever.

PH
Posts: 7604
Joined: 21 Jan 2007, 12:31am
Location: Derby
Contact:

Re: Jess Varnish ..

Postby PH » 17 Jan 2019, 4:29pm

I'm not surprised by the tribunal's decision and I have no particular opinion on whether a different result would have been in the interest of other sports men and women receiving funding. I am however really disappointed that the ability for anyone to deal with unfair treatment depends on their employment status.

landsurfer
Posts: 4998
Joined: 27 Oct 2012, 9:13pm
Location: Rotherham

Re: Jess Varnish ..

Postby landsurfer » 17 Jan 2019, 5:36pm

PH wrote:I'm not surprised by the tribunal's decision and I have no particular opinion on whether a different result would have been in the interest of other sports men and women receiving funding. I am however really disappointed that the ability for anyone to deal with unfair treatment depends on their employment status.


I may be wrong but ... being treated unfairly needs a standard to apply to.
What is unfair ?
How did a person suffer loss ?
There has to a comparison standard.
A gauge of unfair.

In this case the gauge was employment and the law associated with employment.

There has to be a standard / gauge of fair and comparison is the measurement.
It's just like that, it's just the way it is.
The road goes on forever.

landsurfer
Posts: 4998
Joined: 27 Oct 2012, 9:13pm
Location: Rotherham

Re: Jess Varnish ..

Postby landsurfer » 17 Jan 2019, 6:00pm

She says her legal case cost £1m ....(Grauniad).
So either she is very wealthy ... or someone else paid the bloodsuckers .. sorry Lawyers, bills.
It's just like that, it's just the way it is.
The road goes on forever.

Norman H
Posts: 843
Joined: 31 Jul 2011, 4:39pm

Re: Jess Varnish ..

Postby Norman H » 17 Jan 2019, 6:37pm

The unfair treatment hinges on whether her removal from the elite programme was justified or whether it was retribution for going public on management shortcoming at British Cycling. Sadly that's not been tested.

landsurfer
Posts: 4998
Joined: 27 Oct 2012, 9:13pm
Location: Rotherham

Re: Jess Varnish ..

Postby landsurfer » 17 Jan 2019, 6:49pm

Norman H wrote:The unfair treatment hinges on whether her removal from the elite programme was justified or whether it was retribution for going public on management shortcoming at British Cycling. Sadly that's not been tested.


There are quite a few on here who are good with stats ..
How do JV's stats look against fellow riders .. Kenny and Archibald where her peers .. at the time it all kicked off .... I think.
It's just like that, it's just the way it is.
The road goes on forever.

fastpedaller
Posts: 2122
Joined: 10 Jul 2014, 1:12pm
Location: Norfolk

Re: Jess Varnish ..

Postby fastpedaller » 17 Jan 2019, 6:50pm

PH wrote:I'm not surprised by the tribunal's decision and I have no particular opinion on whether a different result would have been in the interest of other sports men and women receiving funding. I am however really disappointed that the ability for anyone to deal with unfair treatment depends on their employment status.


Agreed. It seems to be a bad situation these days where employees are 'deemed to have accepted an employment contract' by dint of working in a company (I had this happen to me once when I asked for a contract and was never given one), yet when there is an issue (there wasn't for me) they are told they aren't really employees. The abundance of zero hours contracts is another example - I've heard of people being told 'you are sacked' from a zero hours contract because they were unable to turn up at short notice. It's ok for the employer to say 'we don't need you today' though. One rule for the rich and another for the poor unfortunately we have moved backwards in employment conditions in recent years IMHO

PH
Posts: 7604
Joined: 21 Jan 2007, 12:31am
Location: Derby
Contact:

Re: Jess Varnish ..

Postby PH » 17 Jan 2019, 7:00pm

landsurfer wrote:
Norman H wrote:The unfair treatment hinges on whether her removal from the elite programme was justified or whether it was retribution for going public on management shortcoming at British Cycling. Sadly that's not been tested.


There are quite a few on here who are good with stats ..
How do JV's stats look against fellow riders .. Kenny and Archibald where her peers .. at the time it all kicked off .... I think.

How do JV's stats compare to those she was told were required to retain her place? I know you think you know enough to come to a conclusion, others think it would have been better if some independent body looked at all the facts. Sadly it doesn't look like there is such a body for those not directly employed.