Jihadi Brides and their Children.

[reohn2]

It hasn't been established AFAIA that she is a terrorist.

Our colleague referenced a 'potential terrorist'

Point taken.

[landsurfer]

A crooked lawyer, the founder/co-owner of an international law firm, someone who actually does do quite a lot of pro bono work (cf Maldives, and others) and one of the most respected international charities. That's your evidence of a gravy train.

Respected International Charity .... obviously not one whose staff sexually abuse the people it's alledgley trying to rescue / help i'm sure ..

[Lance Dopestrong]

Whatever she is, she ain't British no more. If she's a problem with that she should've stayed home.

Sympathy quotient = zero.

[landsurfer]

Whatever she is, she ain't British no more. If she's a problem with that she should've stayed home.

Sympathy quotient = zero.

+1

[Bonefishblues]

A crooked lawyer, the founder/co-owner of an international law firm, someone who actually does do quite a lot of pro bono work (cf Maldives, and others) and one of the most respected international charities. That's your evidence of a gravy train.

Respected International Charity .... obviously not one whose staff sexually abuse the people it's alledgley trying to rescue / help i'm sure ..

Not sure you're helping your case, you know.

[mercalia]

Whatever she is, she ain't British no more. If she's a problem with that she should've stayed home.

Sympathy quotient = zero.

+1

well we will see about that when her appeal for which she has got legal aid goes through?

any way you have missed the point - she is the Uks problem not Bangladesh's problem.

[landsurfer]

Any way you have missed the point - she is the Uks problem not Bangladesh's problem.

She is neither countries problem .... she rejected one and has no rights with the other .... we all make bad choices, but she does not believe she has it seems .... and still wants us to support her .....

[Bonefishblues]

Then we (looking at you, Home Secretary) have violated a fundamental tenet of International Law, leaving aside our moral and political responsibilities to clear up our own mess.

[landsurfer]

Maybe ... "The Law is an Ass" .....

[Bonefishblues]

Seems rather a sensible principle to me. Why might you think otherwise?

[mercalia]

Any way you have missed the point - she is the Uks problem not Bangladesh's problem.

She is neither countries problem .... she rejected one and has no rights with the other .... we all make bad choices, but she does not believe she has it seems .... and still wants us to support her .....

well it seems she didnt reject one ( if you mean by that the UK?) since she wanted to come "home"

again you have missed the point a state cannot make citizen stateless since it seems Bangladesh rejects she has any claim on them. Baldy has broken international law & I hope it catches up on him.

[landsurfer]

Baldy has broken international law & I hope it catches up on him.

Really don't get your point about Javid. She is not a victim , she is a volunteer. She's the baddie not Javid. He's not the terrorist, she is ..... Why do you insult him and want him punished .... he doesn't want to destroy your way of life and kill ... she does ...

[mercalia]

Baldy has broken international law & I hope it catches up on him.

Really don't get your point about Javid. She is not a victim , she is a volunteer. She's the baddie not Javid. He's not the terrorist, she is ..... Why do you insult him and want him punished .... he doesn't want to destroy your way of life and kill ... she does ...

No he is worse, some one who has used his office to further his ambitions

[landsurfer]

No he is worse, some one who has used his office to further his ambitions

Worse than a terrorist !!! A murderer, child killer,destroyer ?
Because he's a politician ?

God help you mercalia, your moral compass is broken.

[Bonefishblues]

Baldy has broken international law & I hope it catches up on him.

Really don't get your point about Javid. She is not a victim , she is a volunteer. She's the baddie not Javid. He's not the terrorist, she is ..... Why do you insult him and want him punished .... he doesn't want to destroy your way of life and kill ... she does ...

Now you seem very sure she's a terrorist, so I'm puzzled. You also seem quite clear that she's a volunteer, not a victim.

Following your approach, she will never be brought to justice though, nor will we find out the truth of the matter.

Let's not bandy around moral compasses.