In a few weeks' time, you won't be allowed to use the word "sponsor€d" anymore. It'll have to be "$pon$ored". Or maybe even "$pon$oяed"....brynpoeth wrote:*are you sponsor€d...

In a few weeks' time, you won't be allowed to use the word "sponsor€d" anymore. It'll have to be "$pon$ored". Or maybe even "$pon$oяed"....brynpoeth wrote:*are you sponsor€d...
brynpoeth wrote:*are you sponsor€d, like someone else on these fora who is so enthusiastic about w*****s pubs seems to be?
(irony alert)
kwackers wrote:brynpoeth wrote:*are you sponsor€d, like someone else on these fora who is so enthusiastic about w*****s pubs seems to be?
(irony alert)
Why do I need to be sponsored?
I'm enthusiastic in that I'd rather people be driving EV's than IC's - that's about the sum of it.
EV's are a step in the right direction, nothing more, nothing less.
Most of my posts are about addressing the usual 'old' myths that perpetuate about them.
I'm also enthusiastic about closing town and city centres to traffic. Also anything that removes the need to own a car or removes the ability of the driver to compromise the safety of the vehicle and those around it.
And making stuff - I love making stuff.
pwa wrote:What you desire is expansion of the "traffic-free" zones, presumably allowing access for deliveries outside busy periods.
kwackers wrote:pwa wrote:What you desire is expansion of the "traffic-free" zones, presumably allowing access for deliveries outside busy periods.
Indeed.
I'd like to see entire centres closed to traffic rather than a few pedestrianised streets which seems to be the way at the moment.
I guess what I want to see is traffic moved away from people, I want to see people feeling safe walking and cycling around their environments. Parks, gardens etc. Stuff we'd probably once have expected of the future but which now have been relegated to some form of 'lefty utopia' by those with the desire to cram more of us into smaller and smaller spaces whilst they live in their Mc Mansions with manicured gardens.