Cassette question

For discussions about bikes and equipment.
mtbsteve1981
Posts: 8
Joined: 7 Oct 2019, 9:36am

Cassette question

Post by mtbsteve1981 »

Hi all,
I have heard that you should change the cassette every 2 chains assuming you change the chain at the recommended point of wear. Is this right or do you generally run it until you get chain skip?

I would like to hear people's thoughts on this.
User avatar
Paulatic
Posts: 7822
Joined: 2 Feb 2014, 1:03pm
Location: 24 Hours from Lands End

Re: Cassette question

Post by Paulatic »

mtbsteve1981 wrote:Hi all,
I have heard that you should change the cassette every 2 chains assuming you change the chain at the recommended point of wear. Is this right or do you generally run it until you get chain skip?

I would like to hear people's thoughts on this.

I run them until the skip doesn’t disappear after ~50 miles with the new chain.
Always been more than 2 chains and sometimes after a full 1% of chain wear.
Whatever I am, wherever I am, this is me. This is my life

https://stcleve.wordpress.com/category/lejog/
E2E info
Brucey
Posts: 44651
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Cassette question

Post by Brucey »

I think the approach above is a very pragmatic one; I often do something similar.

Its worth noting that there are no exact hard and fast rules here; folk (with chains at the same elongation) won't produce exactly the same wear patterns in the cassette, and won't necessarily suffer skipping with a new chain even if they do. It depends how hard you push on the pedals and which sprockets you favour.

Also, new chains vary. Most are close to exactly 0.500" pitch but are usually slightly over (by 0.05% to 0.1%) once they have been run a few miles and most of the grease has been pushed out of the bushings. So some chains skip to start with but this soon disappears. Others can take much longer to settle down, requiring some degree of

a) sprocket wear and/or
b) chain elongation

before running will be 100% skip-free.

It occurs to me that at least one of my favoured gear setups has enough duplication in the ratios that in the 'tapping along' ratios the wear might be spread over more sprockets than might be found in other gear setups. This may make it less likely that any one sprocket is likely to be very badly worn.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Marcus Aurelius
Posts: 1903
Joined: 1 Feb 2018, 10:20am

Re: Cassette question

Post by Marcus Aurelius »

If I really want it running perfectly, I change chain and cassette, and chain rings, and jockey wheels at the same time. However, that’s expensive, and not strictly necessary. But I will ( nearly ) always change the cassette and chain at the same time, unless a chain replacement is necessitated by a very premature chain failure. There is a saying ‘you can’t teach an old cog, new links’ which is very true, you’ll nearly always get some slipping, initially, when you don’t change cassettes and chains together, as the new pairing re mesh. This initial slipping can end up prematurely wearing the new components ( depending on how bad the slippage is, and for how long it goes on ) which can make the ‘changing one, but not the other’ a bit of a false economy.
KM2
Posts: 1338
Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 5:38pm

Re: Cassette question

Post by KM2 »

If you rotate your 2 or 3 chains each month, they’ll all, and the cassette need changing together. When the chains are over length. A worn chain is likely to wear the cassette faster.
User avatar
531colin
Posts: 16134
Joined: 4 Dec 2009, 6:56pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Cassette question

Post by 531colin »

Marcus Aurelius wrote:………. There is a saying ‘you can’t teach an old cog, new links’ which is very true, you’ll nearly always get some slipping, initially, when you don’t change cassettes and chains together, as the new pairing re mesh.......


Wrong. If you change the chain before it has worn the teeth to change the tooth profile, you won't get any skipping.
We had this discussion before https://forum.cyclinguk.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=116834&hilit=cassette&start=15, and since then my cassette dating from 2011 has survived another winter.
NetworkMan
Posts: 727
Joined: 25 Aug 2014, 11:13am
Location: South Devon

Re: Cassette question

Post by NetworkMan »

8 and 9 speed chains are cheap and tedious to clean so I tend to change them at 0.5% elongation or less. Cogs and rings seem to last well. Rotating chains? Not for me - too much bother!
Valbrona
Posts: 2700
Joined: 7 Feb 2011, 4:49pm

Re: Cassette question

Post by Valbrona »

Never trust a chain wear checker. Flawed thinking.
I should coco.
keyboardmonkey
Posts: 1123
Joined: 1 Dec 2009, 5:05pm
Location: Yorkshire

Re: Cassette question

Post by keyboardmonkey »

NetworkMan wrote:8 and 9 speed chains are cheap and tedious to clean so I tend to change them at 0.5% elongation or less. Cogs and rings seem to last well. Rotating chains? Not for me - too much bother!

+1
tmac100
Posts: 58
Joined: 13 May 2016, 1:47pm

Re: Cassette question

Post by tmac100 »

Valbrona wrote:Never trust a chain wear checker. Flawed thinking.

What do you base this statement on?
mtbsteve1981
Posts: 8
Joined: 7 Oct 2019, 9:36am

Re: Cassette question

Post by mtbsteve1981 »

Wow some interesting answers. I had a bike for years that i commuted on daily and never thought to change the chain once.

Now im more into cycling, i like to keep them as well as i can. Its good to hear that i can save money changing the chain sooner. I guess that makes sense as the chain will be in the ideal shape most of the tine and be unable to wear the sprockets too badly
MikeF
Posts: 4347
Joined: 11 Nov 2012, 9:24am
Location: On the borders of the four South East Counties

Re: Cassette question

Post by MikeF »

There are some who are fastidious about changing and cleaning chains and some who are not. However 8 speed chains are cheap whereas higher speed chains can be quite dear so it's a bit horses for courses. I usually change a chain (8 speed) when it's about 0.5%-0.75% worn, but I'm not fastidious. :lol:
"It takes a genius to spot the obvious" - my old physics master.
I don't peddle bikes.
hamster
Posts: 4133
Joined: 2 Feb 2007, 12:42pm

Re: Cassette question

Post by hamster »

Valbrona wrote:Never trust a chain wear checker. Flawed thinking.


Yes, I prefer to hold a crystal near my chain. :lol:
Samuel D
Posts: 3088
Joined: 8 Mar 2015, 11:05pm
Location: Paris
Contact:

Re: Cassette question

Post by Samuel D »

The reason most chain wear indicators are not as useful as they should be is described here. Essentially they measure the wrong thing. For this reason I prefer a ruler.
User avatar
531colin
Posts: 16134
Joined: 4 Dec 2009, 6:56pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Cassette question

Post by 531colin »

Samuel D wrote:The reason most chain wear indicators are not as useful as they should be is described here. Essentially they measure the wrong thing. For this reason I prefer a ruler.

Pedant alert; I would agree that (most) chain wear gauges are not as accurate as they could be because the "wear" they measure includes the "wrong sort of wear". So that if you were determined to wring the last drop of use out of your chain before you binned it, then a wear gauge could be pessimistic, ie it might tell you to replace the chain before it was absolutely worn out.
However, I include "usability" in my definition of "useful". My chain wear gauge is highly usable. I just go into my cold, dark garage and drop the gauge onto the chain, at a number of points. I don't get my hands dirty, and I don't have to take the chain off, or clean it, or anything like that. I don't even have to find my reading glasses.
I'm prepared to accept that I chuck chains away before I really absolutely have to, but 8 speed chains are so cheap that I can't be bothered to clean and mess about with them anyway. I have cassettes in use which I have been using since 2011 and chainrings which are getting on to be old enough to vote.
Post Reply