The "Royals" Thread

Cyril Haearn · Post by **Cyril Haearn** » 25 Nov 2019, 2:40pm

Mike Sales wrote:Completely irrelevant and off topic, but when the title of this thread caught my eye again I realised that "Old Harry" is one of the names of The Lord of the Flies, Old Nick, Beelzebub, Lucifer, Asmodeus.

His name is Henry actually :wink:

Mike Sales · Post by **Mike Sales** » 25 Nov 2019, 3:40pm

Cyril Haearn wrote:
Mike Sales wrote:Completely irrelevant and off topic, but when the title of this thread caught my eye again I realised that "Old Harry" is one of the names of The Lord of the Flies, Old Nick, Beelzebub, Lucifer, Asmodeus.

His name is Henry actually

Archangel Lucifer originally, before his fall.
Means "bearer of light."

mercalia · Post by **mercalia** » 25 Nov 2019, 4:19pm

Mike Sales wrote:
Cyril Haearn wrote:
Mike Sales wrote:Completely irrelevant and off topic, but when the title of this thread caught my eye again I realised that "Old Harry" is one of the names of The Lord of the Flies, Old Nick, Beelzebub, Lucifer, Asmodeus.

His name is Henry actually

Archangel Lucifer originally, before his fall.
Means "bearer of light."

alias Cummins or what ever his name is

Cyril Haearn · Post by **Cyril Haearn** » 25 Nov 2019, 4:40pm

mercalia wrote:
Mike Sales wrote:
Cyril Haearn wrote:His name is Henry actually

Archangel Lucifer originally, before his fall.
Means "bearer of light."

alias Cummins or what ever his name is

'There is something of the night about him'

Who said that of whom?

Oldjohnw · Post by **Oldjohnw** » 25 Nov 2019, 4:41pm

mercalia wrote:
Mike Sales wrote:
Cyril Haearn wrote:His name is Henry actually

Archangel Lucifer originally, before his fall.
Means "bearer of light."

alias Cummins or what ever his name is

And early matches were known as lucifers. Cummings, however, has nothing to do with the light but has something of the night about him.

Mike Sales · Post by **Mike Sales** » 25 Nov 2019, 4:54pm

Cyril Haearn wrote:'There is something of the night about him'

Who said that of whom?

Widdecombe of Michael Howard.
What has happened to him? Stake through the heart?

mercalia · Post by **mercalia** » 25 Nov 2019, 4:58pm

if yiou want proof of cummings look at this picture

see the eyes, satanic red eyes if ever there was

He is atleast a demon?

dim · Post by **dim** » 3 Dec 2019, 8:17pm

[yhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=325&v=WdMNRSUz5MQ&feature=emb_logo

Psamathe · Post by **Psamathe** » 4 Dec 2019, 2:10pm

Oldjohnw wrote:
Polisman wrote:Andrew withdrawing from 230 charities. Holy moly, this is big stuff. :shock:

And what on earth did he do for 230 charities apart from having his name on the letter head?

You (indirectly) raise an important issue. Getting letterhead, publicity, ads, brochures, websites, etc. changed costs money. Charities are meant to spend their resources on good works for their chosen sector NOT spending their money on the fall-out of a prince gone bad. Should he not be paying for all this from his own pocket (which at the end of the day is our pockets anyway). Which maybe illustrates just how daft the kings & queens & subjects system really is.

Ian

mattheus · Post by **mattheus** » 4 Dec 2019, 3:00pm

Psamathe wrote:
Oldjohnw wrote:
Polisman wrote:Andrew withdrawing from 230 charities. Holy moly, this is big stuff.

And what on earth did he do for 230 charities apart from having his name on the letter head?

You (indirectly) raise an important issue. Getting letterhead, publicity, ads, brochures, websites, etc. changed costs money. Charities are meant to spend their resources on good works for their chosen sector NOT spending their money on the fall-out of a prince gone bad. Should he not be paying for all this from his own pocket (which at the end of the day is our pockets anyway).
Ian

Are you serious??

The charity PR teams made a judgement that he'd be good for them. They got it wrong.

What next: compensation payouts to Royalists who are a bit upset that Prince Andy isn't perfect after all?

NATURAL ANKLING · Post by **NATURAL ANKLING** » 25 Dec 2019, 10:24am

Hi,

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10618263/ ... d-epstein/

mercalia · Post by **mercalia** » 25 Dec 2019, 11:23am

What an unhappy pair they look, she looks a frump he a store display dummy

Cunobelin · Post by **Cunobelin** » 25 Dec 2019, 1:05pm

Cyril Haearn wrote:
mercalia wrote:
Mike Sales wrote:
Archangel Lucifer originally, before his fall.
Means "bearer of light."

alias Cummins or what ever his name is

'There is something of the night about him'

Who said that of whom?

Wasn’t that said about Mandelson ?

Mike Sales · Post by **Mike Sales** » 25 Dec 2019, 1:30pm

Cunobelin wrote:
Cyril Haearn wrote:
mercalia wrote:alias Cummins or what ever his name is

'There is something of the night about him'

Who said that of whom?

Wasn’t that said about Mandelson ?

Widdecombe about Michael Howard.

mattheus · Post by **mattheus** » 25 Dec 2019, 5:54pm

mercalia wrote:https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NINTCHDBPICT000499466942.jpg?w=620

What an unhappy pair they look, she looks a frump he a store display dummy

Christmas Day and you're getting your kicks from being rude about pictures of complete strangers in The Sun.

Cycling UK Forum

The "Royals" Thread

Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)

Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)

Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)

Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)

Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)

Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)

Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)

Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)

Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)

Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)

Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)

Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)

Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)

Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)

Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)