Diplomatic Immunity?

Use this board for general non-cycling-related chat, or to introduce yourself to the forum.
Vorpal
Moderator
Posts: 17908
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 3:34pm
Location: Not there ;)

Re: Diplomatic Immunity?

Postby Vorpal » 21 Dec 2019, 1:56pm

Oldjohnw wrote:When I worked around prisons there were many serving such long sentences.

For driving offences?
“In some ways, it is easier to be a dissident, for then one is without responsibility.”
― Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom

merseymouth
Posts: 1466
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 11:16am

Re: Diplomatic Immunity?

Postby merseymouth » 21 Dec 2019, 2:17pm

Hi all, Is there not a case for restricting "Diplomatic Immunity" to exclude motoring offences?
So if a "Diplomat" wants to drive outside their own country they should accept the jurisdiction of that country? That would not limit their role, but would illustrate the fact that they should drive with due care and accept responsibility for the own actions or in-actions!
I would include all parking fines, congestion charges et al which too many nations currently abuse!
If Joe or Joanne Public drove on U.S. roads and committed offences or killed or injured U.S. citizens the State Department would issue extradition notices PDQ wouldn't they?
The intended purpose of such Immunity would be upheld, as there is surely no imperative for diplomats to drive overseas!
It is about time that these procedures were thoroughly reviewed. IGICB MM

Cyril Haearn
Posts: 12300
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am
Location: Between the woods and the water

Re: Diplomatic Immunity?

Postby Cyril Haearn » 21 Dec 2019, 2:26pm

Oldjohnw wrote:When I worked around prisons there were many serving such long sentences.

But not for driving crime, one suspects?
Nice one Cyrille, nice one son..
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on 49" fixed
We love safety cameras, we love life "1330"

Oldjohnw
Posts: 3361
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 4:23am
Location: Northumberland

Re: Diplomatic Immunity?

Postby Oldjohnw » 21 Dec 2019, 5:30pm

If memory serves me correctly the average for dangerous driving is about 5 years. Whilst in my role I rarely knew about actual crimes by individuals many got only a year or so so many got 10+ years.

I had nothing to do with sentencing so I have no idea why the maximum sentence was not used, given that overall, sentencing is tougher year on year
Happy to be better informed.
John

D363
Posts: 122
Joined: 23 Aug 2014, 3:03pm
Location: Sheffield

Re: Diplomatic Immunity?

Postby D363 » 21 Dec 2019, 7:29pm

It's in no way unusual for a conviction for causing death by dangerous driving to attract a substantial prison sentence - a lot of the leniency results either from a lesser conviction being secured, from acquittal after trial or indeed no adequate prosecution being pursued to begin with. A skim read of the 28 thread page confirms this to be the case.

I wouldn't know average or typical sentence lengths, but anyone actually convicted of the above crime could expect a sentence in years, probably in the single figures though.
Last edited by D363 on 21 Dec 2019, 8:56pm, edited 1 time in total.

Oldjohnw
Posts: 3361
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 4:23am
Location: Northumberland

Re: Diplomatic Immunity?

Postby Oldjohnw » 21 Dec 2019, 8:13pm

Tbh, a couple of years in prison is totally destructive. They are violent, coercive, filthy, drug ridden hellholes. People who say otherwise generally know nothing about prisons.
John

D363
Posts: 122
Joined: 23 Aug 2014, 3:03pm
Location: Sheffield

Re: Diplomatic Immunity?

Postby D363 » 22 Dec 2019, 9:32am

Having left the country at the earliest opportunity, Sacoolas has now made a statement through her lawyer to the effect that of course she would come back to face the music, but the prospect of a 14 year prison sentence is too much for what was basically an accident, so she won't.

Oldjohnw
Posts: 3361
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 4:23am
Location: Northumberland

Re: Diplomatic Immunity?

Postby Oldjohnw » 22 Dec 2019, 9:34am

D363 wrote:Having left the country at the earliest opportunity, Sacoolas has now made a statement through her lawyer to the effect that of course she would come back to face the music, but the prospect of a 14 year prison sentence is too much for what was basically an accident, so she won't.


I believe she said she won't come here voluntarily, which means it will require extradition. With Patel at the Home Office don't hold your breath.
John

D363
Posts: 122
Joined: 23 Aug 2014, 3:03pm
Location: Sheffield

Re: Diplomatic Immunity?

Postby D363 » 22 Dec 2019, 9:50am

Oldjohnw wrote:
D363 wrote:Having left the country at the earliest opportunity, Sacoolas has now made a statement through her lawyer to the effect that of course she would come back to face the music, but the prospect of a 14 year prison sentence is too much for what was basically an accident, so she won't.


I believe she said she won't come here voluntarily, which means it will require extradition. With Patel at the Home Office don't hold your breath.


Yes, that's exactly what the said, for the stated reason that her prosecution is a disproportionate response to the matter, which was basically an unfortunate accident.

In theory Patel, with comments on the desirability of the death penalty on record, should be all over this. It more or less goes without saying that she won't be, and will hardly be inconvenienced by the incident at all.

Mike Sales
Posts: 4410
Joined: 7 Mar 2009, 3:31pm

Re: Diplomatic Immunity?

Postby Mike Sales » 22 Dec 2019, 9:54am

This road death is getting a lot more publicity than most.
Trump and Patel have become involved. Has de Piffle stuck his oar in?
Most road "accidents" do not become a political issue and I imagine this will affect the eventual outcome.

D363
Posts: 122
Joined: 23 Aug 2014, 3:03pm
Location: Sheffield

Re: Diplomatic Immunity?

Postby D363 » 22 Dec 2019, 10:09am

Mike Sales wrote:This road death is getting a lot more publicity than most.
Trump and Patel have become involved. Has de Piffle stuck his oar in?
Most road "accidents" do not become a political issue and I imagine this will affect the eventual outcome.


Possibly. But she's already playing the victim card and unfortunately even when prosecutions do proceed, that tends to play well at trial.

Sadly I suspect the Dunn's experience is an all too common one in some respects. While the publicity has been wide it could well be that the high politics dimension will obscure this side of it - namely that loss of life on roads is so often dismissed as an unfortunate accident from which nothing can be learned or changed.

Bonefishblues
Posts: 7366
Joined: 7 Jul 2014, 9:45pm
Location: Near Bicester Oxon

Re: Diplomatic Immunity?

Postby Bonefishblues » 22 Dec 2019, 10:10am

D363 wrote:
Mike Sales wrote:This road death is getting a lot more publicity than most.
Trump and Patel have become involved. Has de Piffle stuck his oar in?
Most road "accidents" do not become a political issue and I imagine this will affect the eventual outcome.


Possibly. But she's already playing the victim card and unfortunately even when prosecutions do proceed, that tends to play well at trial.

Sadly I suspect the Dunn's experience is an all too common one in some respects. While the publicity has been wide it could well be that the high politics dimension will obscure this side of it - namely that loss of life on roads is so often dismissed as an unfortunate accident from which nothing can be learned or changed.

How so?

merseymouth
Posts: 1466
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 11:16am

Re: Diplomatic Immunity?

Postby merseymouth » 22 Dec 2019, 10:20am

SPOT ON D363! They weight things to benefit the motorist, which is more often than not wrong. Kill with negligent use of a firearm and you get no sympathy, as rightly you are expected to exercise due care at all times. But for a weapon arm yourself with a motor vehicle then such an onus to exercise due care at all times is overlooked, excused without real thought being given!
Maybe there is a case for having a Jury made up solely of DVLA Driving Examiners & Class One Police drivers?
If as has been published in the press that Video Footage exists of defective roadcraft then surely no benefit of the doubt should be applied!
IGICB MM

D363
Posts: 122
Joined: 23 Aug 2014, 3:03pm
Location: Sheffield

Re: Diplomatic Immunity?

Postby D363 » 22 Dec 2019, 10:53am

Bonefishblues wrote:
D363 wrote:
Mike Sales wrote:This road death is getting a lot more publicity than most.
Trump and Patel have become involved. Has de Piffle stuck his oar in?
Most road "accidents" do not become a political issue and I imagine this will affect the eventual outcome.


Possibly. But she's already playing the victim card and unfortunately even when prosecutions do proceed, that tends to play well at trial.

Sadly I suspect the Dunn's experience is an all too common one in some respects. While the publicity has been wide it could well be that the high politics dimension will obscure this side of it - namely that loss of life on roads is so often dismissed as an unfortunate accident from which nothing can be learned or changed.

How so?


In raising the prospect of a 14 year sentence. Although her lawyer is (presumably) only trained in US law, it's basic legal knowledge that the 14 year upper limit applies where there are aggravating factors and that such a sentence isn't even remotely possible in this case.

She's raised it as a possibility though, as a justification for staying in the US and presenting the prosecution as an excessive reaction to an unfortunate accident.

mercalia
Posts: 12755
Joined: 22 Sep 2013, 10:03pm
Location: london South

Re: Diplomatic Immunity?

Postby mercalia » 22 Dec 2019, 10:56am

Oldjohnw wrote:
D363 wrote:Having left the country at the earliest opportunity, Sacoolas has now made a statement through her lawyer to the effect that of course she would come back to face the music, but the prospect of a 14 year prison sentence is too much for what was basically an accident, so she won't.


I believe she said she won't come here voluntarily, which means it will require extradition. With Patel at the Home Office don't hold your breath.


and she will insist on brining back the death penalty for such crimes? :wink: