Quadracycles?

General cycling advice ( NOT technical ! )
Grandad
Posts: 1454
Joined: 22 Nov 2007, 12:22am
Location: Kent

Re: Quadracycles?

Post by Grandad »

They are still in business,


Or perhaps not - just noticed that their very extensive Price List is dated 2007
pwu
Posts: 53
Joined: 8 Jul 2019, 2:48pm

Re: Quadracycles?

Post by pwu »

The Chuckle Brothers had a 4 wheel bike
hercule
Posts: 1161
Joined: 5 Feb 2011, 5:18pm

Re: Quadracycles?

Post by hercule »

Utah Trikes in the US (yes, a bit far away from the UK) do conversions of recumbent trikes. The Greenspeed Anura delta style recumbent is also available as a quad - Westcountry Recumbents in the UK are Greenspeed importers.

One of the potential issues is that unlike the stable tripod form of a trike, a quad is going to need some form of suspension or at least articulation to keep all the wheels on the ground on anything less than a completely smooth surface (think of a wobbly table caused by an uneven floor), which means that aftermarket bolt on solutions might not work too well.

A Newton style front axle appeared on eBay a few years ago, I briefly fantasied about adding it to my Ken Rogers trike but sanity intervened in time!

https://www.utahtrikes.com/SEARCH-0:999 ... uad.search

http://www.greenspeed.com.au/Anura.Quad.html

http://www.wrhpv.com/
User avatar
[XAP]Bob
Posts: 19801
Joined: 26 Sep 2008, 4:12pm

Re: Quadracycles?

Post by [XAP]Bob »

nez wrote:
Cunobelin wrote:I don't know if they are still in business, but there was a company called Roman Road, who did a tricycle conversion for bicycles. The difference was that it was a front-wheel conversion (Newton conversion). They converted solo and tandems


Image

I vaguely remember a conversion of a tricycle using this method to a Quad
Presumably Roman Road because they were generally straight. I wouldn’t fancy cornering that at speed.

Why not? Inherently more stable configuration than a conventional trike.
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
nez
Posts: 2080
Joined: 19 Jun 2008, 12:11am

Re: Quadracycles?

Post by nez »

I wouldn’t want to corner one of those at speed either. The low slung tadpole type look very stable, but the big wheel trike look like they might be a bit tippy for my low level of trike skill. But what would I know? I’ve just worked out I haven’t ridden a trike since 1956, when my parents bought me a red scooter. Metto or some such engraved on the footplate. Does anyone remember them?
tatanab
Posts: 5038
Joined: 8 Feb 2007, 12:37pm

Re: Quadracycles?

Post by tatanab »

[XAP]Bob wrote:Why not? Inherently more stable configuration than a conventional trike.
Afraid not. Ask anybody who has owned an upright in that configuration and you will find 99% will tell you they are frightening at speed and cornering is more difficult than on a delta. Reasons being - this config works well with low centre of gravity and comparatively wide vehicles like cars, but not with comparatively narrow ones with high centres of gravity. The usual method of cornering, hang off the side and move the weight down and back, will put your c of g outside the very narrow triangle of stabilities. On a delta of course this triangle is wider at the rear which is why it works. When I had one I tried throwing the weight forward instead of back, but that is a very difficult thing to do. The pros and cons have been discussed many times in the last 150 years, but for sporting/clubman type riding the delta has always come out as the preferred type. For utility purposes and utility speeds it is fine because no athletics are involved. I have 50 years of trike experience, but only had a tadpole configuration for about 7 years, the current owner calls it "the pig".

Roman Road cycles has not been in business a couple of years. The owner moved to be closer to family and had no room for the business, and he has since died.
Last edited by tatanab on 26 Jan 2020, 7:04pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cyril Haearn
Posts: 15215
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am

Re: Quadracycles?

Post by Cyril Haearn »

nez wrote:I wouldn’t want to corner one of those at speed either. The low slung tadpole type look very stable, but the big wheel trike look like they might be a bit tippy for my low level of trike skill. But what would I know? I’ve just worked out I haven’t ridden a trike since 1956, when my parents bought me a red scooter. Metto or some such engraved on the footplate. Does anyone remember them?

I remember a blue one with direct drive to the front wheel, fixed of course
Entertainer, juvenile, curmudgeon, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
User avatar
freiston
Posts: 1510
Joined: 6 Oct 2013, 10:20am
Location: Coventry

Re: Quadracycles?

Post by freiston »

My last experience of four-wheeled cycles was about the same time as when my avatar photo was taken.

Bigger version:
011.jpg
Last edited by freiston on 27 Aug 2022, 12:27am, edited 1 time in total.
Disclaimer: Treat what I say with caution and if possible, wait for someone with more knowledge and experience to contribute. ;)
nez
Posts: 2080
Joined: 19 Jun 2008, 12:11am

Re: Quadracycles?

Post by nez »

Cyril Haearn wrote:
nez wrote:I wouldn’t want to corner one of those at speed either. The low slung tadpole type look very stable, but the big wheel trike look like they might be a bit tippy for my low level of trike skill. But what would I know? I’ve just worked out I haven’t ridden a trike since 1956, when my parents bought me a red scooter. Metto or some such engraved on the footplate. Does anyone remember them?

I remember a blue one with direct drive to the front wheel, fixed of course
I expect you mean the trike. With a proper lid for the ‘boot’. Lovely
Post Reply