New terror attack

Use this board for general non-cycling-related chat, or to introduce yourself to the forum.
Oldjohnw
Posts: 5014
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 4:23am
Location: Northumberland

New terror attack

Postby Oldjohnw » 3 Feb 2020, 12:42pm

Our esteemed Secretary of State for the Home Department spoke six times is an interview today about 'counter terrorism offenders'.

Does anyone have a clue about what on earth she was talking about?

And stopping early release is not the answer. He'd have got out in another year so what would have changed given the total failure of our prison system to effect change?
John

mattheus
Posts: 1564
Joined: 29 Dec 2008, 12:57pm
Location: Western Europe

Re: New terror attack

Postby mattheus » 3 Feb 2020, 1:07pm

Oldjohnw wrote:Our esteemed Secretary of State for the Home Department spoke six times is an interview today about 'counter terrorism offenders'.

Does anyone have a clue about what on earth she was talking about?

Yes!
And stopping early release is not the answer. He'd have got out in another year so what would have changed given the total failure of our prison system to effect change?


An excellent point.

pwa
Posts: 12931
Joined: 2 Oct 2011, 8:55pm

Re: New terror attack

Postby pwa » 3 Feb 2020, 2:59pm

Oldjohnw wrote:Our esteemed Secretary of State for the Home Department spoke six times is an interview today about 'counter terrorism offenders'.

Does anyone have a clue about what on earth she was talking about?

And stopping early release is not the answer. He'd have got out in another year so what would have changed given the total failure of our prison system to effect change?

I thought she said that and then told myself I must have misheard. She's taking all the right words and assembling them, not necessarily in the right order!

That bloke should not have been released. He had been assessed as being a real risk but there was (reportedly) no legal mechanism to keep him locked away. So he was released to do his worst. There ought to be a system to assess and if necessary extend the detention indefinitely. Not just for terror offences. For all violent offenders.

User avatar
mjr
Posts: 16207
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: New terror attack

Postby mjr » 3 Feb 2020, 3:45pm

Do his worst and his worst was taking some cutlery to Boots the chemist? I'm sorry to the people hurt and hope they recover but don't most modern terrorists seem much less scary than the ones most of us grew up with?

Alternatively, was this a great success for the police, following him and stopping him before he hurt any more? Of course, that doesn't fit with minister Patel's hang 'em stance.
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.

Marcus Aurelius
Posts: 1605
Joined: 1 Feb 2018, 10:20am

Re: New terror attack

Postby Marcus Aurelius » 3 Feb 2020, 4:15pm

pwa wrote:That bloke should not have been released. He had been assessed as being a real risk but there was (reportedly) no legal mechanism to keep him locked away. So he was released to do his worst. There ought to be a system to assess and if necessary extend the detention indefinitely. Not just for terror offences. For all violent offenders.


I’d have made sure he was subject to an extraordinary rendition, the second he was released.

Oldjohnw
Posts: 5014
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 4:23am
Location: Northumberland

Re: New terror attack

Postby Oldjohnw » 3 Feb 2020, 4:30pm

Marcus Aurelius wrote:
pwa wrote:That bloke should not have been released. He had been assessed as being a real risk but there was (reportedly) no legal mechanism to keep him locked away. So he was released to do his worst. There ought to be a system to assess and if necessary extend the detention indefinitely. Not just for terror offences. For all violent offenders.


I’d have made sure he was subject to an extraordinary rendition, the second he was released.


There was legislation to keep him in until the Parole Board said he was ready, if at all. Indeterminate Sentences for Public Protection (IPPs), brought in by Jack Straw. It was rather blunt but it could have been smartened up. The current government repealed it and it lapsed to the default of 50% in prison and 50 % in the community.

Blair and Patel have a nerve blaming others.

I remain, however, concerned at extra judicial killings by police. It is easy to justify but is it becoming a pattern? A new normal?
John

pwa
Posts: 12931
Joined: 2 Oct 2011, 8:55pm

Re: New terror attack

Postby pwa » 3 Feb 2020, 4:50pm

Oldjohnw wrote:
Marcus Aurelius wrote:
pwa wrote:That bloke should not have been released. He had been assessed as being a real risk but there was (reportedly) no legal mechanism to keep him locked away. So he was released to do his worst. There ought to be a system to assess and if necessary extend the detention indefinitely. Not just for terror offences. For all violent offenders.


I’d have made sure he was subject to an extraordinary rendition, the second he was released.


There was legislation to keep him in until the Parole Board said he was ready, if at all. Indeterminate Sentences for Public Protection (IPPs), brought in by Jack Straw. It was rather blunt but it could have been smartened up. The current government repealed it and it lapsed to the default of 50% in prison and 50 % in the community.

Blair and Patel have a nerve blaming others.

I remain, however, concerned at extra judicial killings by police. It is easy to justify but is it becoming a pattern? A new normal?

In this sort of instance I'd want the bloke down and immobile ASAP and if killing him does that, fine. There must be a protocol to be followed but once an attack has begun, as it had in this case, the primary concern is the safety of the public. We did have a case in the past where an innocent man was shot dead because it was thought wrongly that he was carrying a bomb, and that is of course the exact opposite of what we need, in that it is infliction of harm on the innocent rather than protection of the innocent. But once a knife is being waved about and blood has been drawn, I have no problem with lethal force being used.

Oldjohnw
Posts: 5014
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 4:23am
Location: Northumberland

Re: New terror attack

Postby Oldjohnw » 3 Feb 2020, 5:05pm

I don't have a problem but we have to remember are not the USA: shoot first and ask questions later.
John

pwa
Posts: 12931
Joined: 2 Oct 2011, 8:55pm

Re: New terror attack

Postby pwa » 3 Feb 2020, 5:13pm

Oldjohnw wrote:I don't have a problem but we have to remember are not the USA: shoot first and ask questions later.

I agree entirely. It probably helps if the armed officers are highly trained in use of firearms, including when not to use them.

mercalia
Posts: 14201
Joined: 22 Sep 2013, 10:03pm
Location: london South

Re: New terror attack

Postby mercalia » 3 Feb 2020, 5:44pm

I could have been one of the victims. My neck of the woods +/- 20m. I would normaly go to Lidls where the event took place at that time +/- 30 minutes but decided to go to Sainsburys on the common instead as my m/c needed a run, other wise I would have been on my bike coming up behind ( the shooting ) along Pinfold road. so I am glad they shot him dead. Any comparisons with the USA are silly as it rarely happens here, in the USA it is the beat cops who are killing people, not anti terrorist squads

Oldjohnw
Posts: 5014
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 4:23am
Location: Northumberland

Re: New terror attack

Postby Oldjohnw » 3 Feb 2020, 5:59pm

I hope it's silly.

Twice in a few weeks. And it does appear Johnson is keen to emulate his American master. Today named journalists were excluded from a Number 10 briefing. Others sensibly walked out.

We can't afford to be asleep on the job.
John

Marcus Aurelius
Posts: 1605
Joined: 1 Feb 2018, 10:20am

Re: New terror attack

Postby Marcus Aurelius » 3 Feb 2020, 6:05pm

Oldjohnw wrote:
I remain, however, concerned at extra judicial killings by police. It is easy to justify but is it becoming a pattern? A new normal?

It’s a tactic taken from the Israeli military, specifically for apprehension of suspects with I.E.Ds ( suicide vests et.al.) or suspicion of. Essentially shoot at the shoulders, followed by the head. Hitting the shoulders prevents them using their arms, the head shot is to kill them. That explains the witness reports of 3 shots heard. It’s also specifically mandated for this type of incident only. The shooters weren’t police either, they were Special forces soldiers, deployed under the auspices of operation Samson.

User avatar
661-Pete
Posts: 9805
Joined: 22 Nov 2012, 8:45pm
Location: Sussex

Re: New terror attack

Postby 661-Pete » 3 Feb 2020, 7:51pm

Oldjohnw wrote:I remain, however, concerned at extra judicial killings by police. It is easy to justify but is it becoming a pattern? A new normal?
Me too. There may be no alternative in this case, but if that individual had been restrained without any further harm to others, so that he could later stand fair trial, I'd have felt a lot more comfortable. And let's not forget Jean Charles de Menezes. An innocent man gunned down by police who mistook him for a terrorist wearing a suicide vest.

One of my nieces is married to a man of Brazilian origin, and I remember him once remarking, when the word "Stockwell" came up in conversation, "Dangerous place for someone like me to be..." Of course he wasn't speaking of danger from terrorists!
Suppose that this room is a lift. The support breaks and down we go with ever-increasing velocity.
Let us pass the time by performing physical experiments...
--- Arthur Eddington (creator of the Eddington Number).

pwa
Posts: 12931
Joined: 2 Oct 2011, 8:55pm

Re: New terror attack

Postby pwa » 3 Feb 2020, 8:05pm

661-Pete wrote:
Oldjohnw wrote:I remain, however, concerned at extra judicial killings by police. It is easy to justify but is it becoming a pattern? A new normal?
Me too. There may be no alternative in this case, but if that individual had been restrained without any further harm to others, so that he could later stand fair trial, I'd have felt a lot more comfortable. And let's not forget Jean Charles de Menezes. An innocent man gunned down by police who mistook him for a terrorist wearing a suicide vest.

One of my nieces is married to a man of Brazilian origin, and I remember him once remarking, when the word "Stockwell" came up in conversation, "Dangerous place for someone like me to be..." Of course he wasn't speaking of danger from terrorists!

That is indeed the cautionary tale we need to keep in mind when we talk about this topic. You can't rewind when you've killed an innocent man. But in this case an attack was underway so that danger was not present.

Oldjohnw
Posts: 5014
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 4:23am
Location: Northumberland

Re: New terror attack

Postby Oldjohnw » 3 Feb 2020, 8:17pm

My worry is: Oh we don't need to properly deal with the problem. We'll just kill them.
John