Dangerous cycling bill introduced to HoL with e-bike and e-scooter inclusion

User avatar
The utility cyclist
Posts: 3607
Joined: 22 Aug 2016, 12:28pm
Location: The first garden city

Dangerous cycling bill introduced to HoL with e-bike and e-scooter inclusion

Post by The utility cyclist »

further to the 1st reading in October last year, it's now come up with electric assist HoL https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/202 ... es(Cycling)Bill(HL)
the original https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/201 ... es(Cycling)Bill(HL)

Despite the harm done by pedestrians to people on bikes and indeed to other pedestrians, there's as yet no proposal for Dangerous, Inconsiderate and careless Pedestrianist laws ...
PH
Posts: 13114
Joined: 21 Jan 2007, 12:31am
Location: Derby
Contact:

Re: Dangerous cycling bill introduced to HoL with e-bike and e-scooter inclusion

Post by PH »

It isn't further to it's first reading, this is a new Bill, this was it's first reading. It may look the same and say the same, but the previous one died with the parliament. Yes we need to watch out for it, but the chances of a private members Bill from the Lords getting into legislation isn't high.
Oldjohnw
Posts: 7764
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 4:23am
Location: South Warwickshire

Re: Dangerous cycling bill introduced to HoL with e-bike and e-scooter inclusion

Post by Oldjohnw »

Pedestrians ‘will face danger if e‑scooters get road approval’

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... _clipboard
John
fastpedaller
Posts: 3436
Joined: 10 Jul 2014, 1:12pm
Location: Norfolk

Re: Dangerous cycling bill introduced to HoL with e-bike and e-scooter inclusion

Post by fastpedaller »

Oldjohnw wrote:Pedestrians ‘will face danger if e‑scooters get road approval’

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... _clipboard


I should think e-scooter riders will face danger if they're mixing in with traffic.
One thing that worries me is that people are already saying e-scooter users will HAVE to wear helmets, and that could re-enforce the (IMHO wrong) opinion that cyclist should also.
kwackers
Posts: 15643
Joined: 4 Jun 2008, 9:29pm
Location: Warrington

Re: Dangerous cycling bill introduced to HoL with e-bike and e-scooter inclusion

Post by kwackers »

fastpedaller wrote:I should think e-scooter riders will face danger if they're mixing in with traffic.
One thing that worries me is that people are already saying e-scooter users will HAVE to wear helmets, and that could re-enforce the (IMHO wrong) opinion that cyclist should also.

There's no aspect of e-scooter use that doesn't apply to bicycles and vice versa (including folk saying you have to wear a helmet).

Similar speed (probably slower - I've overtaken a fair number on my bike), same width and so same visibility.
Should be on the roads (or cycle paths) not on pavements and if the roads are too dangerous for scooters then they're too dangerous for bicycles.

Currently I reckon they're probably safer by virtue of being unusual - even as a cyclist I spot them a mile up the road whereas I probably wouldn't notice a cyclist a similar distance away.
fastpedaller
Posts: 3436
Joined: 10 Jul 2014, 1:12pm
Location: Norfolk

Re: Dangerous cycling bill introduced to HoL with e-bike and e-scooter inclusion

Post by fastpedaller »

kwackers wrote:There's no aspect of e-scooter use that doesn't apply to bicycles and vice versa (including folk saying you have to wear a helmet).


I've not ridden a powered scooter, but scooted a manual powered one in my early years :wink:
I'd think their handling and stability may be very poor compared to a bike - do they have brakes? the drivetrain is perhaps the braking? I'd suggest whatever braking they have would be limited by their tendency to lift the rear wheel dramatically (a lot worse than a bicycle) due to the combination of poor weight distribution and very short wheelbase, but I'm willing to be corrected of course.
Last edited by fastpedaller on 3 Feb 2020, 9:04am, edited 1 time in total.
hemo
Posts: 1438
Joined: 16 Nov 2017, 5:40pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: Dangerous cycling bill introduced to HoL with e-bike and e-scooter inclusion

Post by hemo »

e scooters with their tiny wheels stand more chance of spitting it's rider to the ground then a larger wheel bike or ebike, helmets will be more beneficial to e scooter riders.
kwackers
Posts: 15643
Joined: 4 Jun 2008, 9:29pm
Location: Warrington

Re: Dangerous cycling bill introduced to HoL with e-bike and e-scooter inclusion

Post by kwackers »

fastpedaller wrote:
kwackers wrote:There's no aspect of e-scooter use that doesn't apply to bicycles and vice versa (including folk saying you have to wear a helmet).


I've not ridden a powered scooter, but scooted a manual powered one in my early years :wink:
I'd think their handling and stability may be very poor compared to a bike - do they have brakes? the drivetrain is perhaps the braking? I'd suggest whatever braking they have would be limited by their tendency to lift the rear wheel dramatically (a lot worse than a bicycle) due to the combination of poor weight distribution and very short wheelbase, but I'm willing to be corrected of course.

I've ridden one a few times (there are a couple in the office now).
They handle a lot better than a manual scooter by virtue of more weight, bigger wheels, pneumatic tyres etc In fact I was quite surprised by how well they rode - I expected a lot worse. Stability in particular - something I expected to be far worse was actually pretty good and they're a lot more manoeuvrable.

Braking is worse than a bicycle - but probably not by as much as you think. The one I've tried used the front wheel motor to brake the front wheel and had a disc at the back, so under hard braking the front didn't lock (the rear did) but in reality I think the scooter at 15mph can stop better (i.e shorter) than my bicycle at 20mph (and probably a lot better than the increasing number of bicycles I see with no brakes at all).

You can't bunny hop them up kerbs and you'd need to keep your eyes open for any decent pot holes but you'd be doing that on a bicycle anyway, obviously the small wheels increase the chances of decent pot holes throwing you off but you'd ride with that in mind - just as I take more care on my folder compared to my tourer.

I think overall my opinion that if roads are dangerous for scooters then they're dangerous for bikes stands.

As a commuter "last mile" vehicle I think they're preferable to a folding bike and tbh I think I'd dump my folder in favour of one tomorrow.
User avatar
mjr
Posts: 20332
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: Dangerous cycling bill introduced to HoL with e-bike and e-scooter inclusion

Post by mjr »

hemo wrote:e scooters with their tiny wheels stand more chance of spitting it's rider to the ground then a larger wheel bike or ebike, helmets will be more beneficial to e scooter riders.

They'd need to have a different design to bike helmets because it seems like you're much more likely to face plant (bike helmet no use, at best) than go over the handlebars and land on the top of your head (bike helmet intended and tested protection).
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.
reohn2
Posts: 45174
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 8:21pm

Re: Dangerous cycling bill introduced to HoL with e-bike and e-scooter inclusion

Post by reohn2 »

IMO the problem isn't e-scooters,e-bikes or bikes at all,but the sheer lack of forethought by the public and authotities on what future town and city centre travel should be like.
One thing's for sure things can't carry on as they are but almost no one's making any real serious progress for change AFAICS.
On pollution levels alone the private car needs stopping from entering in total but for a very few strictly monitored exceptions,Taxis and public transport should be green 'n clean,deliveries being made either by clean transport or when there's least footfall in the case of larger unavoidably polluting L/HGV deliveries,and there should be way,way more road space and priority given over to active travel.
Manchester with Burnham and Boardman working toward that end but it's a slow haul against much opposition locally.

My 2d's worth
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
pete75
Posts: 16370
Joined: 24 Jul 2007, 2:37pm

Re: Dangerous cycling bill introduced to HoL with e-bike and e-scooter inclusion

Post by pete75 »

Do e-scooters ride and brake any differently to a normal petrol scooter. This is a Vespa e-scooter. Doesn't appear vastly different to their petrol versions.


Image
'Give me my bike, a bit of sunshine - and a stop-off for a lunchtime pint - and I'm a happy man.' - Reg Baker
100%JR
Posts: 1138
Joined: 31 May 2016, 10:47pm
Location: High Green,Sheffield.

Re: Dangerous cycling bill introduced to HoL with e-bike and e-scooter inclusion

Post by 100%JR »

The one you've pictured is still classed as a motor vehicle and comes under the same laws.The one's proposed to be made legal are these types:-
Image

Image

Along the lines of a kids scooter but with a electric motor rather than a Motor Scooter(Vespa/Peugeot/Yamaha etc) with an electric engine :wink:
pete75
Posts: 16370
Joined: 24 Jul 2007, 2:37pm

Re: Dangerous cycling bill introduced to HoL with e-bike and e-scooter inclusion

Post by pete75 »

100%JR wrote:The one you've pictured is still classed as a motor vehicle and comes under the same laws.The one's proposed to be made legal are these types:-
Image

Image

Along the lines of a kids scooter but with a electric motor rather than a Motor Scooter(Vespa/Peugeot/Yamaha etc) with an electric engine :wink:


I thought they were legal - there appear to be lots of them about. My son had one years ago when he was 12 - bought it at Tesco with his birthday money.
'Give me my bike, a bit of sunshine - and a stop-off for a lunchtime pint - and I'm a happy man.' - Reg Baker
kwackers
Posts: 15643
Joined: 4 Jun 2008, 9:29pm
Location: Warrington

Re: Dangerous cycling bill introduced to HoL with e-bike and e-scooter inclusion

Post by kwackers »

pete75 wrote:I thought they were legal - there appear to be lots of them about. My son had one years ago when he was 12 - bought it at Tesco with his birthday money.

Technically he was breaking the law. ;)

The "legal-in-other-countries" scooters are basically similar to e-bikes; 250w and 15mph - although since you can't assist them they accelerate somewhat more slowly.
Here in the UK they've basically fallen between the gaps in legislation so are by default illegal rather than explicitly legislated against.

Main advantage is they fold up almost flat - brilliant for trains, stood on their end they take up no room. Less dirty looks from other commuters!
No dirty bits; chain etc to catch your clothes so you could in theory ride them in a suit if you so desired.
Easy to carry once folded.
Almost no maintenance.
Easy to store at home or at work.
Fits easily into a small cars boot.
fullupandslowingdown
Posts: 614
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 5:47pm
Location: missing Snottingham, the home of Raleigh and Boots
Contact:

Re: Dangerous cycling bill introduced to HoL with e-bike and e-scooter inclusion

Post by fullupandslowingdown »

so, if scooters do become road legal subject to perhaps a 15mph limit, how about getting the maximum assisted speed for electric bikes raised to 25mph. any thoughts? In the same way that the illegal use of CBs in the UK eventually led to them being legalised, albeit in a slightly different format to the ones used and imported from the usa etc, we all know of cyclists who have electric bikes capable of trashing the legal speed, whether by design or by tampering. Legalise and control through sensible proportionate licensing.
Post Reply