mikeymo wrote:reohn2 wrote:About the app:- https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-53105642
Steve
Seems soft lad doesn't know what you do
I assume you work in software development?
You assume wrong,but I know someone who does.
mikeymo wrote:reohn2 wrote:About the app:- https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-53105642
Steve
Seems soft lad doesn't know what you do
I assume you work in software development?
mikeymo wrote:kwackers wrote:Now the tracking app - that's a different story.
I could definitely have sorted that - and created one that would have worked to boot.
Of course you would.
I'm great at doing other people's jobs too. That Gareth Southgate is rubbish, I should be England manager.
mikeymo wrote:Exactly. Somebody else is doing it, not you. Coulda woulda shoulda.
kwackers wrote:mikeymo wrote:Exactly. Somebody else is doing it, not you. Coulda woulda shoulda.
Except of course they're not (anymore).
Couldn't wouldn't shouldn't.
You've got monkeys in charge, buying services from companies that can't deliver and when they do it's more by luck than judgement.
Comedy gold.
Paulatic wrote:Remember the Satellite system
44F16FD0-291E-491F-88D9-2000BB4B57D6.jpeg
Syd wrote:An OJEU tender takes a minimum of 45 days from publication of the contract notice to the end of the standstill period.
In reality the time is even longer as the contract notice has to be generated and a period of evaluation of responses included.
A properly ran tender can run into months.
It seems that over £1b worth of contracts have been fast tracked following suspension of the standard rules during this pandemic.
I have 34 perfectly capable intensive care ventilators sitting on site that would not yet been purchased under standard rules.
philg wrote:US officials had been drawn to the idea that important navigation technology could be “hidden in plain sight” on up to 80 of OneWeb’s planned 648 satellites, making them harder to compromise, according to two people who held discussions with both US defence officials and the UK government.
sjs wrote:philg wrote:US officials had been drawn to the idea that important navigation technology could be “hidden in plain sight” on up to 80 of OneWeb’s planned 648 satellites, making them harder to compromise, according to two people who held discussions with both US defence officials and the UK government.
OneWeb went bankrupt in March, and made most of its staff redundant. At the moment it's not clear at all whether the remaining 580 satellites of he 648 planned will ever be launched, and if so who will own them and for what purpose.