Reduced Speed Limits
-
- Posts: 36780
- Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm
Re: Reduced Speed Limits
This is one of the things which has changed enormously over the years. Once upon a time, the enforcement of road traffic legislation was a big police priority, before the concept of policing priorities was introduced. Having said that, the ways of enforcing speed limits were cumbersome - either a patrol car following a suspected speeder over a distance or "portable" roadside radar the size of a large sideboard. Neither was ideal for things like 20mph limits. Anyway, afaik, the guidance about consultation with the police was really about the feasibility of enforcing a particular limit.
I'm well-aware that this thread is about Scotland, but as a local example, the Leeds South Easter Urban Motorway (last bit of M1 as was, now part of the M621) was built to lower standards than normal motorways and a 50mph limit was in force from its opening. We only had a couple of miles of this within Leeds but it was constantly patrolled and offenders were prosecuted (no speed awareness courses then.) Long ago now, but I've prosecuted 50 in an afternoon on overtime at Leeds Magistrates' Court. (Bugger the expense.)
Now, it's not a priority so it gets zero attention.
Over the same period, the technology for the enforcement of speed limits has massively advanced and it doesn't need police officers to do it. It's no longer "bugger the expense" so police "chiefs" are reluctant to divert resources to this. ie Opposition is financial, rather than operational.
Taking my example of the Leeds South Eastern Urban Motorway, Highways England should be allowed, nay required, to install sufficient cameras to keep speeds down to the design standard of the road independently of the police. It's a bit of an irony that during recent roadworks, a number of cameras were installed on permanent-looking masts but have been removed following completion of the works.
As I've suggested elsewhere on here, I get the impression that Highways England and possibly others are going to get increased powers in this regard.
I'm well-aware that this thread is about Scotland, but as a local example, the Leeds South Easter Urban Motorway (last bit of M1 as was, now part of the M621) was built to lower standards than normal motorways and a 50mph limit was in force from its opening. We only had a couple of miles of this within Leeds but it was constantly patrolled and offenders were prosecuted (no speed awareness courses then.) Long ago now, but I've prosecuted 50 in an afternoon on overtime at Leeds Magistrates' Court. (Bugger the expense.)
Now, it's not a priority so it gets zero attention.
Over the same period, the technology for the enforcement of speed limits has massively advanced and it doesn't need police officers to do it. It's no longer "bugger the expense" so police "chiefs" are reluctant to divert resources to this. ie Opposition is financial, rather than operational.
Taking my example of the Leeds South Eastern Urban Motorway, Highways England should be allowed, nay required, to install sufficient cameras to keep speeds down to the design standard of the road independently of the police. It's a bit of an irony that during recent roadworks, a number of cameras were installed on permanent-looking masts but have been removed following completion of the works.
As I've suggested elsewhere on here, I get the impression that Highways England and possibly others are going to get increased powers in this regard.
Re: Reduced Speed Limits
Just got an email from one of the councillors - as per the OP the bill has passed.
I am really struggling to believe that all 30mph zones (apart from trunk roads) in the whole of the Scottish Borders are going to have a 20mph speed limit.
People (as in drivers) are going to go absolutely nuts when they learn what is happening.
I am really struggling to believe that all 30mph zones (apart from trunk roads) in the whole of the Scottish Borders are going to have a 20mph speed limit.
People (as in drivers) are going to go absolutely nuts when they learn what is happening.
Re: Reduced Speed Limits
"Speed limit slashed in 80 Borders towns and villages"
https://news.stv.tv/east-central/speed-limit-slashed-in-80-borders-towns-and-villages
It's an 18 month trial. That article links to a list of the affected areas.
Jonathan
https://news.stv.tv/east-central/speed-limit-slashed-in-80-borders-towns-and-villages
It's an 18 month trial. That article links to a list of the affected areas.
Jonathan
Re: Reduced Speed Limits
I'm not surprised. There was a similar decision in Wales earlier this summer.
Re: Reduced Speed Limits
"20mph residential streets speed limit plans backed by Senedd"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-53416999
Jonathan
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-53416999
Jonathan
Re: Reduced Speed Limits
Pebble wrote:People (as in drivers) are going to go absolutely nuts when they learn what is happening.
There hasn't been all that much fuss when 20 limits have been brought in around here. I think most people do see a reason for it.
Re: Reduced Speed Limits
pwa wrote:Pebble wrote:People (as in drivers) are going to go absolutely nuts when they learn what is happening.
There hasn't been all that much fuss when 20 limits have been brought in around here. I think most people do see a reason for it.
Likewise here, quite a few roads in housing schemes etc have 20 now and most people see it as good and sensible. However what is coming is a bit OTT (brilliant for me as a cyclist) but we are talking about every single road in the town, wide long arterial routes that already feel very slow and tedious at 30, are now going to be 20mph
The reaction is going to be very interesting, at the moment virtually nobody even knows this was proposed, I only found out about it 4 days ago and evryone I have spoke to since are completely clueless
-
- Posts: 2445
- Joined: 7 Jul 2008, 12:52am
Re: Reduced Speed Limits
Pebble wrote:People (as in drivers) are going to go absolutely nuts when they learn what is happening.
It is a mistake to assume that the sort of petrol-head loudmouths that frequent the right wing media are representative of drivers as a whole.
Drivers are also people who live in these places, have children, and want their streets to be safe every bit as much as we do. When other places have implemented 20mph areas they have been hugely popular.
-
- Posts: 2445
- Joined: 7 Jul 2008, 12:52am
Re: Reduced Speed Limits
Is anyone aware of a map where you can view the speedlimits. There used to be a tool on ito world that displayed the open street map speed limits as a colour coded map so you could compare the policies of different places.
Re: Reduced Speed Limits
Pete Owens wrote:Is anyone aware of a map where you can view the speedlimits. There used to be a tool on ito world that displayed the open street map speed limits as a colour coded map so you could compare the policies of different places.
https://cyclosm.org shows 20mph and 30kph as light blue, but I don't know anything that shows all speed limits and I'd like one that showed 40mph rural roads. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key ... d#Services has some queries but nothing that reveals 40mph for me.
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.
Re: Reduced Speed Limits
Pebble wrote:pwa wrote:Pebble wrote:People (as in drivers) are going to go absolutely nuts when they learn what is happening.
There hasn't been all that much fuss when 20 limits have been brought in around here. I think most people do see a reason for it.
Likewise here, quite a few roads in housing schemes etc have 20 now and most people see it as good and sensible. However what is coming is a bit OTT (brilliant for me as a cyclist) but we are talking about every single road in the town, wide long arterial routes that already feel very slow and tedious at 30, are now going to be 20mph
The reaction is going to be very interesting, at the moment virtually nobody even knows this was proposed, I only found out about it 4 days ago and evryone I have spoke to since are completely clueless
The proposal in Wales, for 20 to be the default speed in residential areas, seems to me to allow for higher limits where it is deemed appropriate, for example on trunk roads. If that is indeed what we end up with, I would broadly welcome that. My own inclination as a driver is already to drive at significantly less than 30 on residential streets that are not main roads. 30 seems too high on most residential streets. Even 20 seems high on some streets.
-
- Posts: 36780
- Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm
Re: Reduced Speed Limits
FWIW, I think this may have a better chance of enforcement at policy level in Scotland than elsewhere, but somebody with local knowledge will have a better idea.
I think that the formation of Police Scotland has brought the most senior officers under more political influence. Lower down the hierarchy, police in Scotland are covering big areas by the standards of the rest of the UK and I suspect there will be loads of backwoodsmen away from places like Glasgow and Edinburgh.
I think that the formation of Police Scotland has brought the most senior officers under more political influence. Lower down the hierarchy, police in Scotland are covering big areas by the standards of the rest of the UK and I suspect there will be loads of backwoodsmen away from places like Glasgow and Edinburgh.
Re: Reduced Speed Limits
Pebble wrote:Just got an email from one of the councillors - as per the OP the bill has passed.
I am really struggling to believe that all 30mph zones (apart from trunk roads) in the whole of the Scottish Borders are going to have a 20mph speed limit.
People (as in drivers) are going to go absolutely nuts when they learn what is happening.
I too was surprised at the scope - all towns and most villages.
At one level, I think its a good way to try 20mph. There's little doubt/confusion about whether its 20 or not; if its a built up area its 20 (was 30). Whereas a "20 here, 30 there, 40 somewhere else" approach is confusing (particularly when added to the signs buried in an overgrown hedge). It might make evaluation a bit simpler as there is something to look at from all communities.
I agree some of the drivers are going to go nuts on social media about it; probably mid September when the signs start to appear. And its going to make some of the runs into towns very different to drive, even for those trying to be law-abiding.
Top-tip: if your car has cruise control, then likely it also has a speed limiter option. Usually a single button press to work it. I find the speed limiter brilliant in urban areas (and average camera long roadworks); stop worrying about exceeding the speed limit, and I can then just drive to what I can see around me.
thirdcrank wrote:FWIW, I think this may have a better chance of enforcement at policy level in Scotland than elsewhere, but somebody with local knowledge will have a better idea.
I am not expecting much enforcement, other than by some drivers sticking to the new limit forcing those behind to go slower. There are not that many police officers around, and the borders is a big area with relatively few people.
- Nigel
Re: Reduced Speed Limits
I am old enough to remember when the green grocer came round with a horse and cart. The butcher had a van, apart from the coal man coming on the street, these, in general were the only vehicles on the street. We as kids played street games, and it was safe. Now it is all about getting from a to b as fast as possible. No one seems to have time any more. Perhaps more twenty mile per hour speed limits might eventually lead to people taking more time and allowing the extra time for travelling to their destination.
Going back to the coal man, I also remember one local coal man being prosecuted for driving too slow, twelve miles per hour. Traffic was held up behind him. Everyone in the area knew him, his defence was “my wagon won’t go any faster”. I think this was in the early eighties, his lorry was from the thirties, and would be carrying 3 tons of coal at a time.
We are far too fixated with speed, what do we do with all the time saved by living a faster pace of life. I’m sure we would all eventually get used to slower speed limits.
Going back to the coal man, I also remember one local coal man being prosecuted for driving too slow, twelve miles per hour. Traffic was held up behind him. Everyone in the area knew him, his defence was “my wagon won’t go any faster”. I think this was in the early eighties, his lorry was from the thirties, and would be carrying 3 tons of coal at a time.
We are far too fixated with speed, what do we do with all the time saved by living a faster pace of life. I’m sure we would all eventually get used to slower speed limits.
-
- Posts: 15215
- Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am
Re: Reduced Speed Limits
'lower', not slower?
..
There is a lot of opposition, I just spent a moment looking at a forum for enthusiastic drivers, one of the mortons on there suggested those driving 'too slowly' should be shot
'Wicked sense of humour' again, does anyone think such 'jokes' are acceptable?
..
There is a lot of opposition, I just spent a moment looking at a forum for enthusiastic drivers, one of the mortons on there suggested those driving 'too slowly' should be shot
'Wicked sense of humour' again, does anyone think such 'jokes' are acceptable?
Entertainer, juvenile, curmudgeon, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies