chainring question.
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: 12 Nov 2011, 5:51pm
chainring question.
Is the height difference, relative to the front mech., between a 50t and 46t chainring fractionally over 8mm ?
-
- Posts: 4347
- Joined: 11 Nov 2012, 9:24am
- Location: On the borders of the four South East Counties
Re: chainring question.
Maths indicate the difference in radius of the 2 rings should be 8.1mm assuming the tips of the teeth are spaced at 1/2" or 12.75mm123malford wrote:Is the height difference, relative to the front mech., between a 50t and 46t chainring fractionally over 8mm ?
"It takes a genius to spot the obvious" - my old physics master.
I don't peddle bikes.
I don't peddle bikes.
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: 12 Nov 2011, 5:51pm
Re: chainring question.
That's good. Many thanks.
-
- Posts: 4347
- Joined: 11 Nov 2012, 9:24am
- Location: On the borders of the four South East Counties
Re: chainring question.
Hope my maths is right! I haven't those sizes of chainrings to measure. However I've measured the difference between a 34 tooth and a 46 tooth and the difference in radius is close to 24mm - maybe 23.5mm, but not easy to measure. It's approximately 2mm radius difference per tooth eg 4 tooth difference is 8mm.123malford wrote:That's good. Many thanks.
Maths is as follows circumferences are 50x12.75mm and 46x12.75mm. Divide by PI (3.142.......) to obtain the diameters. Actual diameter doesn't matter, but only the difference ie 4x12.75/PI high gives 16.2mm diameter. The actual diameter is slightly different on my rings.
"It takes a genius to spot the obvious" - my old physics master.
I don't peddle bikes.
I don't peddle bikes.
- Chris Jeggo
- Posts: 580
- Joined: 3 Jul 2010, 9:44am
- Location: Surrey
Re: chainring question.
Quite right. 1/2 inch difference in circumference => 12.7mm/2pi = 2.02mm difference in radius.
-
- Posts: 2914
- Joined: 9 Jun 2008, 8:06pm
Re: chainring question.
The tips are a bit more than 1/2" apart because 1/2" is the chain pitch, and the chain sits lower than the tips.
Re: chainring question.
in real chainring pairs for a double chainset the usual thing is that (for shifting purposes) the teeth on the big ring are shorter than those on the inside chainring. Hence it can appear to be (well, is actually) slightly less than 2mm per tooth.
cheers
cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~