mattsccm wrote:Brother wants a MTB for some fairly serious off road use. Stuff transmission wear, it will be cheaper than his motorcycles.
What he wants is something that gives him Chris Hoys legs without thinkjng about it. What he hasn't realised is that it will be crap on tbe gravel as he'll have to pedal a heavy old lump at 16mph
mattsccm wrote:Cheers. I will stay here as i am getting somewhere. But why the sensors? I understand the words cadence and torque but what do they?
We/I am after factual info about the tech. Picking a tool should be about how it works not the end result.
stodd wrote:I'm afraid you can either have simple or comprehensive but not both. Comprehensive is bound to cover detailed discussions on different motors, for example. He isn't really a novice any more if he has had the chance to try all those different machines.
mattsccm wrote:Brother wants a MTB for some fairly serious off road use. Stuff transmission wear, it will be cheaper than his motorcycles.
What he wants is something that gives him Chris Hoys legs without thinkjng about it. What he hasn't realised is that it will be crap on tbe gravel as he'll have to pedal a heavy old lump at 16mph
Some hope I guess.mattsccm wrote:What we need is comprehensive without arguments.
50sbiker wrote:stodd wrote:I'm afraid you can either have simple or comprehensive but not both. Comprehensive is bound to cover detailed discussions on different motors, for example. He isn't really a novice any more if he has had the chance to try all those different machines.
Precisely. .No short cut to research and try some ....And pin down exactly what you will do with it most often...
Round the doors...Halfords rear hub perfectly sensible..I prefer touring,50 mile a day...off road when ever possible...Cannot wait for my Riece and Muller Delite...E bikes are defo the """way to go""
got this model for touring...hence the dual batteries ...the g/f has the nevo with enviolo gearing which she loves to bits also belt
