Pictures of your recumbent

DIscuss anything relating to non-standard cycles and their equipment.
yostumpy
Posts: 1000
Joined: 29 Oct 2010, 6:56pm

Re: Pictures of your recumbent

Post by yostumpy »

I wouldn’t have said a Speed machine was any better Audax wise than a Giro 20, it’s also probably heavier. I have a Street Machine GTE and it’s heavy, but supremely comfortable. I have raced on it in standard form, with the BHPC. Recently I have fitted ( against all advice to say it can’t be done), new front forks. I have turned my 26/20 tourer, into a 26/26 ‘lighter ‘ by 1.2kg, racing ...... :lol: high racer machine for the forthcoming BHPC season. 26 “ rigid disc forks, with 1” steerer, are the rocking horse poo of the of front forks world. It’s noticeable quicker, much higher, but I am 6’2” , and I miss the front suspension, and it’s a bit more awkward in traffic , until one gets used to it. Pot holes, on the other hand , are to be avoided, as they make ones teeth clash.
User avatar
squeaker
Posts: 4114
Joined: 12 Jan 2007, 11:43pm
Location: Sussex

Re: Pictures of your recumbent

Post by squeaker »

yostumpy wrote: 2 Jan 2022, 9:05amRecently I have fitted ( against all advice to say it can’t be done), new front forks. I have turned my 26/20 tourer, into a 26/26 ‘lighter ‘ by 1.2kg, racing ...... :lol: high racer machine for the forthcoming BHPC season.
As per the subject line, a photo would be interesting ;) Do you have any tweaks for keeping the rear suspension under control when racing?
"42"
Gee
Posts: 102
Joined: 24 Mar 2021, 10:11pm

Re: Pictures of your recumbent

Post by Gee »

Cowsham wrote: 2 Jan 2022, 5:39am
Gee wrote: 1 Jan 2022, 6:38pm
Cowsham wrote: 1 Jan 2022, 5:50pm

The A26 looks nice too -- I like the two wheels the same size. I'd think a little better over the potholes if you happen to hit one.
Yes, I’m looking for something a bit quicker over lng distances for audax really.
Is it a hard ride? ie is there enough flex in the frame to give you some comfort?
I think so, I find it very comfortable. 1’m on 32mm Kojak’s and I’m never uncomfortable.
belgiangoth
Posts: 1657
Joined: 29 Mar 2007, 4:10pm

Re: Pictures of your recumbent

Post by belgiangoth »

Gee wrote: 1 Jan 2022, 6:38pm It’s not bad, about 31 pounds, I usually overfill the brains box!! I’m on the lookout for another one, perhaps a high racer or a speedmachine.
...
Yes, I’m looking for something a bit quicker over lng distances for audax really.
As has been mentioned the SPM is not really that speedy, depends on your audax distances. It's a decent bike for sub 100 mile runs as it is V comfortable and has good areo advantage. Over 100 miles you start to pay for the extra mass and would be better served with something lighter that depends on annular pneumatic suspension.

If you really are after an SPM and anywhere near Birmingham ...
If I had a baby elephant, I would put it on a recumbent trike so that it would become invisible.
yostumpy
Posts: 1000
Joined: 29 Oct 2010, 6:56pm

Re: Pictures of your recumbent

Post by yostumpy »

Imagehillingdon 1 21 014 by mark tilley, on Flickr


Standard racing guise 2020 and 2021 (pic taken at Hillingdon race track)

ImageIMG_2136 (2) by mark tilley, on Flickr

As fitted, not tested on the track yet.

I might add, that I swapped it back to sus forks, as I was due to go on a ride with others , that would entail coming home after dark, and the 20" wheel has a dynamo, BUT I could of course just put the 20" wheel in the 26" forks, as they are all disc braked. I didn't think of that at the time. So due to swap back. Not been on Grunhilda since 11 October ride, so going to get 'bent legs back for a month, then early feb, do my 65 km loop ride with 20" sus forks, with Strava, then swap forks and wheel, and a couple of days later, do it again,just to see time / avg speed difference.Then keep it on, for the season. Apart from the lack of suspension, it is actually a more comfortable position.
Gee
Posts: 102
Joined: 24 Mar 2021, 10:11pm

Re: Pictures of your recumbent

Post by Gee »

belgiangoth wrote: 2 Jan 2022, 4:25pm
Gee wrote: 1 Jan 2022, 6:38pm It’s not bad, about 31 pounds, I usually overfill the brains box!! I’m on the lookout for another one, perhaps a high racer or a speedmachine.
...
Yes, I’m looking for something a bit quicker over lng distances for audax really.
As has been mentioned the SPM is not really that speedy, depends on your audax distances. It's a decent bike for sub 100 mile runs as it is V comfortable and has good areo advantage. Over 100 miles you start to pay for the extra mass and would be better served with something lighter that depends on annular pneumatic suspension.

If you really are after an SPM and anywhere near Birmingham ...
Cheers, I’m thinking long audax, building up to LEL etc. I think you are probably right about a speed machine. The Giro is my first bent so I’ve little to compare it to. I guess I could ways sell it and t4y another, weight is definitely a thing with Audax. Do you have a Speed Machine? I’m in Hull.
User avatar
Cowsham
Posts: 5048
Joined: 4 Nov 2019, 1:33pm

Re: Pictures of your recumbent

Post by Cowsham »

yostumpy wrote: 2 Jan 2022, 7:50pm Imagehillingdon 1 21 014 by mark tilley, on Flickr


Standard racing guise 2020 and 2021 (pic taken at Hillingdon race track)

ImageIMG_2136 (2) by mark tilley, on Flickr

As fitted, not tested on the track yet.

I might add, that I swapped it back to sus forks, as I was due to go on a ride with others , that would entail coming home after dark, and the 20" wheel has a dynamo, BUT I could of course just put the 20" wheel in the 26" forks, as they are all disc braked. I didn't think of that at the time. So due to swap back. Not been on Grunhilda since 11 October ride, so going to get 'bent legs back for a month, then early feb, do my 65 km loop ride with 20" sus forks, with Strava, then swap forks and wheel, and a couple of days later, do it again,just to see time / avg speed difference.Then keep it on, for the season. Apart from the lack of suspension, it is actually a more comfortable position.
like that suspension back and front -- do those big chain tubes cause much resistance ?
I am here. Where are you?
User avatar
[XAP]Bob
Posts: 19801
Joined: 26 Sep 2008, 4:12pm

Re: Pictures of your recumbent

Post by [XAP]Bob »

066A37B5-5910-4FC8-B2B7-EA1176DA181E.jpeg
Ok, it’s mostly a shadow ;)
And the forum hasn’t respected the rotation…
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
Jdsk
Posts: 24876
Joined: 5 Mar 2019, 5:42pm

Re: Pictures of your recumbent

Post by Jdsk »

066A37B5-5910-4FC8-B2B7-EA1176DA181E.jpeg
066A37B5-5910-4FC8-B2B7-EA1176DA181E.jpeg (67.74 KiB) Viewed 4223 times
UpWrong
Posts: 2440
Joined: 31 May 2009, 12:16pm
Location: Portsmouth, Hampshire

P-38 finished!

Post by UpWrong »

Build finished. Weight as shown, 29 lbs:
IMG_20220311_161611_HDR.jpg
IMG_20220311_161841_HDR.jpg
IMG_20220311_161918_HDR.jpg
Jdsk
Posts: 24876
Joined: 5 Mar 2019, 5:42pm

Re: Pictures of your recumbent

Post by Jdsk »

Well done. And one of you on it, please.

Jonathan
User avatar
squeaker
Posts: 4114
Joined: 12 Jan 2007, 11:43pm
Location: Sussex

Re: Pictures of your recumbent

Post by squeaker »

Neat :) I thought the lacing of the front wheel was odd...until I realised I was including the gaps between the floor tiles :roll:
"42"
Stradageek
Posts: 1666
Joined: 17 Jan 2011, 1:07pm

Re: Pictures of your recumbent

Post by Stradageek »

My favourite photo to demonstrate the comparative aerodynamics of recumbents vs uprights
033-CTCPF04.jpg
firedfromthecircus
Posts: 310
Joined: 23 Jan 2012, 7:50pm

Re: P-38 finished!

Post by firedfromthecircus »

UpWrong wrote: 11 Mar 2022, 5:14pm Build finished. Weight as shown, 29 lbs:
Fantastic! 8)
Campag
Posts: 95
Joined: 2 Dec 2018, 8:04pm

Re: Pictures of your recumbent

Post by Campag »

Looks good
Post Reply