Re: Political parties getting copies of the full electoral register as well as the "marked" register (ie the one saying who actually voted).
Psamathe wrote: 3 May 2024, 7:50pm
Data aggregation can provide organisations with a lot of detailed knowledge about individuals. If parties are taking the full electoral role (rather than just the open register). Plus the marked register (who voted in previous elections), plus their own data collection. Then what other data are they collecting/buying from other sources (unknown to those the information is about).
Whilst I'm a bit busy these days I will try and put in some subject access requests to see what is being aggregated. That said, probably not so much about me as I don't do the high profile social media and wont buy or create accounts where their T&Cs don't provide adequate privacy undertakings.
Ian
Subject Access Requests are "progressing" and very interesting (at least the process).
Massive differences between Parties in their verification as to my identity. e.g. Labour very strict requiring scan of Drivers License or passport (or photo ID) before even starting to look; whereas the Conservatives got an e-mail from me with my name and "
I confirm receipt of your request for information held about you be Conservative Campaign Headquarters. No further information is needed.".
"The Common People" who have never had a candidate standing in my constituency also take the electoral register (one wonders why) but it turned out whilst they'd got data, when they looked it wasn't the data they thought it was so have had to request the registers from the Council again!
Local Greens & National Lib Dems both required a Utility bill (scanned). Some others who took the registers are being very slow at responding - so I'll give a little more time before going to the ICO (and I don't accept an "unexpected General election" as any excuse for not fulfilling legal obligations).
Ian