axel_knutt wrote: ↑5 Aug 2024, 10:21am
Cowsham wrote: ↑5 Aug 2024, 10:01amWasn't there a lot of safeguards brought in after that?
If you think there's any accountability in the NHS you need to listen to those with the personal experience to know better. As the Gosport Inquiry itself says, people who complained were ignored and dismissed as trouble makers. Nothing has changed.
I remember in a time in the 80's before Shipman my father telling me about visiting an old friend of ours " Davy " who was in hospital and the docs were trying to find out what was wrong with him.
Davy was normally a very happy placid sort of man who would always be a joy to talk to but at this time was frustrated and angry, a side of him my father had never seen before.
Turned out they were keeping the diagnosis of terminal prostate cancer from him ( I don't know why -- they did things differently back then I guess )
This was before there were the early diagnosis and treatments like we have now and by this time he was terminally ill.
When the doctors finally told him his usual happy demeanor returned and told my father he was ready to go. The doctors "helped" him on his way and he passed peacefully.
Yes another anecdote of mine but true and it happened a lot before Shipman.
After Shipman people languished in terrible pain for too long before the end because of the "safeguards " brought in so my opinion is he ( or unfit for purpose judges / law makers ) done much more damage after he was caught than before.
I am here. Where are you?