UK Politics

Use this board for general non-cycling-related chat, or to introduce yourself to the forum.
mattheus
Posts: 5788
Joined: 29 Dec 2008, 12:57pm
Location: Western Europe

Re: UK Politics

Post by mattheus »

al_yrpal wrote: 5 Nov 2024, 3:10pm Just waded through details of the Cabinet.

Only one has ever done a proper job, Mrs Rayner

Not one has started or ever run a business
We should get Trump in - he's started plenty of businesses.
pwa
Posts: 18085
Joined: 2 Oct 2011, 8:55pm

Re: UK Politics

Post by pwa »

mattheus wrote: 6 Nov 2024, 2:32pm
al_yrpal wrote: 5 Nov 2024, 3:10pm Just waded through details of the Cabinet.

Only one has ever done a proper job, Mrs Rayner

Not one has started or ever run a business
We should get Trump in - he's started plenty of businesses.
Or Musk. If we think business people make good leaders of nations, he must be supremely qualified. I may not be serious about that.
User avatar
al_yrpal
Posts: 12007
Joined: 25 Jul 2007, 9:47pm
Location: Think Cheddar and Cider
Contact:

Re: UK Politics

Post by al_yrpal »

Biospace wrote: 6 Nov 2024, 2:28pm
al_yrpal wrote: 5 Nov 2024, 3:10pm Just waded through details of the Cabinet.
...
As for the farmers, I'm hoping they take their muck spreaders

Al
An inspired teacher has lifelong positive effects on their pupils, a poor one can do lasting damage. It sounds like you've experienced the latter.
Yes, 50% inspirational and good and 50% awful. Only one in the cabinet besides Rayner that has done anything actually useful. The Dud seems to get animated any time a bit of prosecution is required. His dad was a toolmaker but he seems to have produced the ultimate useless tool. Four more years of this :(

Al
Reuse, recycle, thus do your bit to save the planet.... Get stuff at auctions, Dump, Charity Shops, Facebook Marketplace, Ebay, Car Boots. Choose an Old House, and a Banger ..... And cycle as often as you can......
Biospace
Posts: 2903
Joined: 24 Jun 2019, 12:23pm

Re: UK Politics

Post by Biospace »

al_yrpal wrote: 6 Nov 2024, 4:39pm Yes, 50% inspirational and good and 50% awful.
...
Not sure whether Streeting is inspiring or awful in his lecturing of Ken Livingstone here, although he appears to have loyalty to Starmer. The new leader and his cabinet did come across as exceedingly pale and stale at PMQ's this lunchtime.

Nearholmer
Posts: 5331
Joined: 26 Mar 2022, 7:13am

Re: UK Politics

Post by Nearholmer »

For now, I don’t give a monkeys if they seem pale and stale, or attract a load of opprobrium from entrenched interests, and “yah, boo, sucks” stuff from the faragists. They’ve got a big enough majority to allow them to do stuff, so what I’m interested in is whether they crack-on and do it, and don’t allow themselves to be blown off course by the gales of bad breath from the likes of the daily mail.

If they do, and it works in terms of improving the lot of a significant number of people, those actions will tell in their favour, and the time to worry about looking all bright and shiny and full of bounce will be twelve to eighteen months out from the next general election.

Of course, all sorts of outside influences, from putin to the maga-cult, with plenty besides, will attempt to distract and topple them, and to rev the faragists, and the Scot’s nats, and all of the other soft underbellies, up to fever pitch for next time, cos nobody wants a functioning example of social democracy on the go, so it won’t be easy, it will be very tough.
axel_knutt
Posts: 3510
Joined: 11 Jan 2007, 12:20pm

Re: UK Politics

Post by axel_knutt »

Biospace wrote: 6 Nov 2024, 2:28pm
An inspired teacher has lifelong positive effects on their pupils, a poor one can do lasting damage.
Wot, only teachers?
“I'm not upset that you lied to me, I'm upset that from now on I can't believe you.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche
PH
Posts: 13784
Joined: 21 Jan 2007, 12:31am
Location: Derby
Contact:

Re: UK Politics

Post by PH »

al_yrpal wrote: 5 Nov 2024, 3:10pm Just waded through details of the Cabinet.

Only one has ever done a proper job, Mrs Rayner

Not one has started or ever run a business

Mostly just a bunch of lawyers and policy wonks.

No wonder they appear so out of touch
Al
Have you done the same with the shadow cabinet? There's been a growing trend in the professionalisation of politicians over the last thirty years. A quick google will bring up plenty of research on the subject (I know, I know, looking at the research isn't a very Tory thing to do) In the good old days, there was a clear route to being a Labour candidate from the shop floor, through being elected a union rep and then sponsored by that union, I suspect there were some objected to that as well. The lawyers were usually the Tories, there's such a long tradition of that, that the HoC hours are designed not to interfere with their practice at the bar. I don't know about the Liberals, it feels like most I've met used to be teachers.
Is it a bad thing? The role has changed, those things that keep you in touch are as likely to be due to your upbringing than your previous employment. Good MP's, of whatever party, have a lot of contact with their constituents, if they don't know what their concerns are, they've failed the fundamental part of the job. I'm not sure that running a business makes someone a better MP, anymore than running a union branch would. The new Tory leader likes to present herself as an engineer, but apparently she was a software engineer, a highly skilled job no doubt, but it does feel like she's misrepresenting herself.
Nearholmer
Posts: 5331
Joined: 26 Mar 2022, 7:13am

Re: UK Politics

Post by Nearholmer »

I personally think that experience of running something significant outside of politics, with a high load of responsibility and accountability, would/does make for better senior politicians. It sort of doesn’t matter what the organisation in which the experience is gathered is, but gathering it does. Vince Cable always struck me as very grounded and capable in that regard. And actually, whether you like the cut of the current PMs jib or not, having been the DPP probably fits the bill.
User avatar
mjr
Posts: 20589
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: UK Politics

Post by mjr »

Nearholmer wrote: 6 Nov 2024, 8:00pm I personally think that experience of running something significant outside of politics, with a high load of responsibility and accountability, would/does make for better senior politicians. It sort of doesn’t matter what the organisation in which the experience is gathered is, but gathering it does. Vince Cable always struck me as very grounded and capable in that regard. And actually, whether you like the cut of the current PMs jib or not, having been the DPP probably fits the bill.
Like the current PM, Vince Cable spent most of his career working in the public sector (various governments and university) apart from a few years in private practice (at Shell) but not running it. It's shameful how differently these similar career paths are reported by the media and reveals how partisan the press is now.
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.
Nearholmer
Posts: 5331
Joined: 26 Mar 2022, 7:13am

Re: UK Politics

Post by Nearholmer »

It doesn’t matter a fig whether the role has been public sector, private sector, military, charity, trades union, church or w,h.y., the important things are whether it involved a stack of accountability, and overseeing lots of resources and/or making far-reaching decisions, because those are the things that hone people’s abilities to do the things that a senior role in government involves, give exposure to the “real world” challenges of actually running a show, at peril of humiliation if you make a cod’s of it. Cable was Chief Economist at Shell ….. that’s not a role you screw-up lightly, because if you do, the monetary implications are immense.
User avatar
mjr
Posts: 20589
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: UK Politics

Post by mjr »

Nearholmer wrote: 6 Nov 2024, 9:06pm It doesn’t matter a fig whether the role has been public sector, private sector, military, charity, trades union, church or w,h.y., the important things are whether it involved a stack of accountability, and overseeing lots of resources and/or making far-reaching decisions, because those are the things that hone people’s abilities to do the things that a senior role in government involves, give exposure to the “real world” challenges of actually running a show, at peril of humiliation if you make a cod’s of it. Cable was Chief Economist at Shell ….. that’s not a role you screw-up lightly, because if you do, the monetary implications are immense.
Arguably, the implications could have been even more immense if Starmer had sunk Doughty Street Chambers when second-in-command there, it was the first Chambers set up outside the Inns and would be missed much more than just another oil company. Did Starmer have a stack of accountability? Yep. Lots of resources? Hard to say because it's not a public company and doesn't seem to publish accounts. Far-reaching decisions? Yep. So why doesn't he get similar coverage to Cable? It's because he's a bit leftie, isn't it?
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.
Grangerider
Posts: 3
Joined: 4 Nov 2024, 7:38am

Re: UK Politics

Post by Grangerider »

Reeves was an economist with the BoE. Mahmoud was a barrister. Benn, Milliband and Cooper have all run major departments. I prefer bureaucrats to plutocrats and oligarchs.
mattheus
Posts: 5788
Joined: 29 Dec 2008, 12:57pm
Location: Western Europe

Re: UK Politics

Post by mattheus »

axel_knutt wrote: 6 Nov 2024, 6:55pm
Biospace wrote: 6 Nov 2024, 2:28pm
An inspired teacher has lifelong positive effects on their pupils, a poor one can do lasting damage.
Wot, only teachers?
You could put "Star Wars movie" in there, with much the same truth.
Jdsk
Posts: 27884
Joined: 5 Mar 2019, 5:42pm

Re: UK Politics

Post by Jdsk »

Psamathe wrote: 6 Mar 2024, 8:09pm
Jdsk wrote: 6 Mar 2024, 6:29pm
Psamathe wrote: 6 Mar 2024, 12:30pm So we pay because she decided that rather than investigate, rather than raise her concerns with the body privately, instead she went for publicity on Twitter for the whole world to see ... defamation (unfounded accusations) ... as a Minister she expected the taxpayer to fund her defamatory posting (which it seems we did).

And one cannot help but think about all those public services that can't be funded, all those in desperate need not getting the help they need whilst our money is spaffed away by publicity seeking Conservative Ministers committing unfounded defamation.

She decided to defame others, she should pay the bill.
"A DSIT spokesperson said: "There is an established precedent under multiple administrations that Ministers are provided with legal support and representation where matters relate to their conduct and responsibilities as a Minister, as was the case here. The Secretary of State received the appropriate advice from relevant officials at all times. A sum of £15,000 was paid without admitting any liability. This approach is intended to reduce the overall costs to the taxpayer that could result from protracted legal action, no matter what the result would have been."

A completely irrelevant and inappropriate response. Defaming people isn't part of her job "as a Minister".
I agree (with you, not with DSIT). Her Ministerial responsibility would have been to raise her concerns with UKRI (privately). Posting on Twitter to the whole world was NOT a Ministerial responsibility. Also, as a Minister she would have had the responsibility to investigate before making defamatory allegations in public.
New advice to Ministers from the Attorney General:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... dium=email

The first paragraph is a good start:
"A central element of the rule of law is that everyone – including the government – is subject to the law. As such, the government is required to comply with legal obligations arising under domestic and international law. This is affirmed in the Ministerial Code which refers to “the overarching duty on Ministers to comply with the law”, including international law."

Jonathan
Jdsk
Posts: 27884
Joined: 5 Mar 2019, 5:42pm

Re: UK Politics

Post by Jdsk »

Jdsk wrote: 8 Nov 2024, 9:45am ...
New advice to Ministers from the Attorney General:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... dium=email

The first paragraph is a good start:
"A central element of the rule of law is that everyone – including the government – is subject to the law. As such, the government is required to comply with legal obligations arising under domestic and international law. This is affirmed in the Ministerial Code which refers to “the overarching duty on Ministers to comply with the law”, including international law."
"Keir Starmer’s rewrite of the ministerial code is long overdue":
https://www.instituteforgovernment.org. ... erial-code

The headline is very misleading, but it's a good article on a big improvement.

Jonathan
Post Reply