Rebranding of Cycling Uk

User avatar
Philip Benstead
Posts: 2082
Joined: 13 Jan 2007, 7:06pm
Location: Victoria , London

Rebranding of Cycling Uk

Post by Philip Benstead »

Rebranding of Cycling Uk

https://www.cyclinguk.org/publication/c ... january-25
Page 12

Communications
BRAND NEW
CYCLING UK
Research shows us that awareness of Cycling UK and what we do is low, and that our current brand isn’t helping us to engage new people. So we are working on an improved brand to communicate who we are and what we stand for. This process will invite input from members, trustees and others. We’re not changing our name; we’ll still be Cycling UK. The new brand will launch in spring.

Maybe we should rebrand as Cyclists’ Touring Club or Cycling Transport Club?

https://www.cyclinguk.org/publication/c ... january-25

To access CYCLE, you need to be a CTC member and log in.

Gearing up for 2025
CYCLINGUK.ORG cycle 7
Gearing up for 2025
This year Cycling UK inspired more cyclists to ride, campaigned for better cycling provision and launched a bold new strategy.
There’s more to come, says Sarah Mitchell
As we move towards the end of a busy year, this is a great opportunity to pause and reflect on the difference we have made together through the charity. In June we launched our bold five-year strategy, setting out how we will create happier, healthier and greener lives through cycling. Five months on, it’s exciting to see the progress that has already been made.
We’re committed to making cycling accessible to everyone, no matter their age, background or ability and, as the data from 2023/24 shows (page 18), our impact as a charity continues to grow. I’m proud to see that, in addition to our loyal 70,000 members, we’ve reached over 100,000 people with our community-based cycling programmes.
Cycling UK has been a consistent advocate for safer, more accessible cycling throughout our 146-year history.
Your support has enabled us to continue our campaigning tradition this year with several key policy victories, from saving the vital Active Travel Schools programme in Northern Ireland to helping to secure a record budget for cycling, walking and wheeling in Scotland. We’ve mobilised thousands of people – including many of our members – to drive forward policies for safer roads in local communities.
Our member groups this year gave people in their local communities exceptional cycling experiences by putting on more than 8,000 rides. Our dedicated volunteers contributed almost 10,000 hours to the charity! Thanks to all of you who have supported us this way.
A big focus for us this year has been on engaging and influencing politicians and decision-makers, particularly in the run up to, and following, July’s general election. In October I had a
productive first meeting with UK Local Transport Minister Simon Lightwood MP. We
discussed Cycling UK’s priorities for the new government, including pushing for funding to be shifted away from road building towards active travel. In the Autumn Budget, Cycling UK was pleased to see a further £100m of capital funding for active travel in England – a positive step, but we know that much greater investment is needed. We’ll continue to work with our partners in the world of walking, wheeling and cycling to push for that investment to become a reality.
Another exciting development is that we are working on a refreshed brand for Cycling UK. Research has shown us that knowledge of Cycling UK and what we do is low – particularly among the general public but even among supporters and members. Our existing brand is also preventing us from engaging with the new audiences we need to reach in order to achieve our mission. We’ve been running focus groups with members and working on an updated look and feel that will help us increase our reach and impact – but we’ll be keeping our name.
In line with our new strategy and our future aims, you, our members, voted to support some key changes to Cycling UK’s governance during this year’s AGM (see page 8). The changes were put forward following engagement with members, experts and the wider cycling community, and will make our charity more effective, sustainable, representative and impactful. It was also encouraging to see 25% more members voting this year compared to last.
In this issue of Cycle, we are launching our winter appeal, the proceeds from which will help us continue to change lives through cycling into 2025 and beyond. Please do contribute if you can – your support will help more people experience the transformational benefits of cycling.
And finally, I would like to extend a special thank you to our trustees, for a year of hard work! Firstly, thanks to our former chair Janet Atherton for her immense support and commitment to the charity through my first years as chief executive, and secondly thanks to all our current trustees for the time and effort they have put into our work this year. They are all volunteers and we really appreciate their input, their time and their commitment. Thank you for all your support for Cycling UK in 2024.
Wishing you a merry Christmas and a happy New Year.


Rebranding of Cycling Uk

https://www.cyclinguk.org/publication/c ... january-25
Page 12

Communications
BRAND NEW
CYCLING UK
Research shows us that awareness of Cycling UK and what we do is low, and that our current brand isn’t helping us to engage new people. So we are working on an improved brand to communicate who we are and what we stand for. This process will invite input from members, trustees and others. We’re not changing our name; we’ll still be Cycling UK. The new brand will launch in spring.


President: Jon Snow
Chief Executive: Sarah Mitchell
Cycling UK is a trading name of Cyclists' Touring Club (CTC) a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no: 25185. Registered as a charity in England and Wales charity no: 1147607 and in Scotland charity no: SC042541. Registered office: Parklands, Railton Road, Guildford, Surrey GU2 9JX.
Copyright © CTC 2024
Last edited by Philip Benstead on 3 Dec 2024, 5:18am, edited 1 time in total.
Philip Benstead | Life Member Former CTC Councillor/Trustee
Organizing events and representing cyclists' in southeast since 1988
Bikeability Instructor/Mechanic
User avatar
mjr
Posts: 20682
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: Rebranding of Cycling Uk

Post by mjr »

I bet the CTC blue and gold is finally exorcised this time.

Note that they rule out changing the name back to the one with a century of heritage, that appears on historic buildings, that a larger minority have heard of. Only a rebrand is being considered, still tied to the bland name.
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.
User avatar
Philip Benstead
Posts: 2082
Joined: 13 Jan 2007, 7:06pm
Location: Victoria , London

Re: Rebranding of Cycling Uk

Post by Philip Benstead »

mjr wrote: 2 Dec 2024, 6:45pm I bet the CTC blue and gold is finally exorcised this time.

Note that they rule out changing the name back to the one with a century of heritage, that appears on historic buildings, that a larger minority have heard of. Only a rebrand is being considered, still tied to the bland name.
Can you Brand A Brand?
Philip Benstead | Life Member Former CTC Councillor/Trustee
Organizing events and representing cyclists' in southeast since 1988
Bikeability Instructor/Mechanic
User avatar
gaz
Posts: 14817
Joined: 9 Mar 2007, 12:09pm
Location: Kent

Re: Rebranding of Cycling UK

Post by gaz »

NCA1.png
User avatar
Philip Benstead
Posts: 2082
Joined: 13 Jan 2007, 7:06pm
Location: Victoria , London

Re: Rebranding of Cycling Uk

Post by Philip Benstead »

What about:
cycling 4 all or cycling for all
cycling 4 you
cycling 4 us
Active Travel Cycling
Cycling Active Travel
Cycling 4 Health
Transport for health
Cycling are us
Philip Benstead | Life Member Former CTC Councillor/Trustee
Organizing events and representing cyclists' in southeast since 1988
Bikeability Instructor/Mechanic
PH
Posts: 13855
Joined: 21 Jan 2007, 12:31am
Location: Derby
Contact:

Re: Rebranding of Cycling Uk

Post by PH »

I was glad Touring came out of the name, though equally glad that the member groups could keep it. It didn't offer much of an indication about what the national organisation covered, but is still the best description, IMO, of local group rides.
Not a fan of the current branding, wasn't there something else in the pipeline at one time? Can't remember what it was but I thought it better than Cycling UK. It is a pretty broad organisation, I'm not sure there is a single branding that will manage to cover it all. IMO might be better to concentrate on branding the various projects under an umbrella name, in which case Cycling UK is probably OK.
User avatar
gaz
Posts: 14817
Joined: 9 Mar 2007, 12:09pm
Location: Kent

Re: Rebranding of Cycling UK

Post by gaz »

PH wrote: 2 Dec 2024, 8:27pm... Not a fan of the current branding, wasn't there something else in the pipeline at one time? Can't remember what it was ...
CTC Council Meeting January 2014, item 14 wrote:Motion:
Agree in principle to a trading name change. Take the necessary action to register and protect the name of National Cycling Association.

To set up a new working group to carry out further work to look at the implementation and wider brand issues as well as any name change. To bring a report back to Council in April for approval.
Proposed by: Barry Flood Seconded by: Philip Benstead
...
Motion Carried
:wink:
keithb
Posts: 50
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 10:33am

Re: Rebranding of Cycling Uk

Post by keithb »

Not really a surprise this.

They don't really have "a brand", or even a logo (just the name of the organisation in a specific font/layout).

I've said it before but BC, CUK and Sustrans need to get together and divvy up cycling into 3 broad categories and each focus on one area. Say:
Competitive sport (BC)
Non competitive and utility cycling (CUK,)
traffic free leisure infrastructure,(Sustrans).

The current market for cycling groups is too confused and fragmented with no single voice or clear purpose ( unlike, say, the ramblers).

One of these bodies needs to be holding government to account (including active travel England, highway authorities and local authorities) over funding, design standards, implementation of schemes etc. I do not believe Sustrans is the right body, as they are broadly responsible for the "national cycling network" that provided a dreadful.template for any infrastructure that followed for the next 25 years

No point in rebranding if you don't know what your brand is for...
SAS
Posts: 2
Joined: 13 Jan 2025, 10:54am

Re: Rebranding of Cycling Uk

Post by SAS »

I've said it before but BC, CUK and Sustrans need to get together and divvy up cycling into 3 broad categories and each focus on one area. Say:
Competitive sport (BC)
Non competitive and utility cycling (CUK,)
traffic free leisure infrastructure,(Sustrans).

The current market for cycling groups is too confused and fragmented with no single voice or clear purpose ( unlike, say, the ramblers).
I'd agree that the org needed to rebrand in some way - 'Touring' is a very limited subset of non-competitive cycling that has a fusty and unfashionable image. The existence and growth of 'bike-packing' - (which as far as I can see is indistinguishable) seems to show that. But Cycling UK never cut through for me made worse by 'we are cycling uk' and the frankly horrible typeface/colour combo.

I think it's only natural that ALL of the orgs listed campaign for 'cycling for all' - safer conditions and better infrastructure. People competing at the velodrome near me cycle to get there. Time trials take place on open roads - as do many 'semi-competitive' sport events (Sportives or Orienteering type things). 'Traffic free leisure infrastructure' should be safe to reach by bike. And "traffic free leisure infrastructure" functions as a travel network - a significant part of use on the Bristol Bath Railway path (the first Sustrans built) are commuters. Leisure routes link places people want to go - while admittedly many at the moment do so in an indirect way.

And you've left off all of the City cycle campaign groups - from the LCC with a full time staff of about a dozen and 12000 paying members in London, to the many groups where local volunteers lobby their council for more facilities. What would be good would be for all these orgs to speak to Government with a common voice (which they increasingly already have done)

Personally I'd probably nationalise Sustrans, protect it in law, give it a large budget and the power to compulsorily purchase land and over ride councils who aren't building a standards-compliant cycle network at pace. It should be in charge of delivering both core 'transport' network and leisure routes across England (and ideally the UK) But that's not exactly a fully thought through strategy.

Cycling UK should be about leisure cycling - from riding around a country park, travelling the world or mountain biking in your local hills. It should be campaigning on rights of way, access, 'bike friendly hotels' etc etc. My experience of 'road clubs' in London is that they are really 'racing' groups but they battle on their club runs with an awful lot of riders who just want a 'fast' leisure ride and have no interest in racing. Those people should be core market for CTC/Cycling UK but having ridden in London for 30 years never heard of CUK ride of that type here.

Whether you can practically unite those disparate groups of cyclists and their insular identities is another matter...
SAS
Posts: 2
Joined: 13 Jan 2025, 10:54am

Re: Rebranding of Cycling Uk

Post by SAS »

The current market for cycling groups is too confused and fragmented with no single voice or clear purpose ( unlike, say, the ramblers).
Well,

https://www.ramblers.org.uk/go-walking/ramblers-groups
On 1 January 1935 the Ramblers Association was officially created. We're the only charity dedicated to removing barriers so everyone can enjoy walking in green spaces, and to improving Britain’s most popular and least-known walking places. We’re committed to campaigning to keep our countryside open to all and to fighting for the things that matter most to walkers

https://www.englandathletics.org/about-us/
the membership and development body for running clubs

https://www.britishathletics.org.uk/about-us/
UK Athletics is the National Governing Body for athletics.


https://www.livingstreets.org.uk
The UK charity for everyday walking

Ramblers is about leisure walking, mainly in the countryside = Cycling UK. Then you've got a number of sporting organisations. And you've got an 'everyday walking' group who campaign for safe walking - crossings, quiet streets, removing obstacles like pavement parking.

The main difference is we largely already have an 'all ages and abilities' walking network - in towns and cities at least - nearly all roads have pavements and there are signalised or zebra crossing in many places (but not without gaps). Cycling is a long way from that.
VinceLedge
Posts: 649
Joined: 12 Dec 2020, 9:51am

Re: Rebranding of Cycling Uk

Post by VinceLedge »

Error
Last edited by VinceLedge on 13 Jan 2025, 1:54pm, edited 1 time in total.
VinceLedge
Posts: 649
Joined: 12 Dec 2020, 9:51am

Re: Rebranding of Cycling Uk

Post by VinceLedge »

Cycling UK could certainly do with making it clear what it's purpose is. I have just looked at their web page and it is not obvious and what it appears to offer doesn't really encourage you to join.
deeferdonk
Posts: 246
Joined: 11 May 2019, 2:50pm

Re: Rebranding of Cycling Uk

Post by deeferdonk »

SAS wrote: 13 Jan 2025, 12:02pm

Ramblers is about leisure walking, mainly in the countryside = Cycling UK.
Could rebrand as the Bimblers Association
keithb
Posts: 50
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 10:33am

Re: Rebranding of Cycling Uk

Post by keithb »

Hmmm... The column in Cycle specifically states they're not looking to change the name. HOwever, technically they didnt chnage the name when they transformed into Cycling UK, as it's only trading name of the formally registered body - the Cyclists Touring Club. So they could totally ditch "Cycling UK" and go with an entirely new "brand name" while maintaining the stance they they haven't changed the name....

Not that I'm a cynic or anything...
mattsccm
Posts: 5252
Joined: 28 Nov 2009, 9:44pm

Re: Rebranding of Cycling Uk

Post by mattsccm »

The whole organisation is just a Jack of all trades and not at all good at anything. Most cyclists won't of heard of CUK. Even our past club secretary hadn't and why would she, she races? No advertising worth having.
Many are confused as to what they do and many of us don't care about lots of the aspects.
Post Reply