My very point upthread about being pointless to replly. Glad we agree, although kudos on the star trek reference.atoz wrote: 27 Nov 2024, 6:09pmWe know roads are paid for out of general taxation. So do the anti cyclists. Don't waste your time talking to people who don't and won't listen. As Spock used to say in Star Trek "illogical Captain". You're dealing with irrational behaviour. That's why some politicians are really successful- just tell people what they want to hear. I can predict the next slogan "Make Motoring Great Again". Or "Drive Baby Drive".Tangled Metal wrote: 19 Nov 2024, 11:41am I think the point is nobody who uses the roads pay for it directly. It is all paid for indirectly by the taxation pot we all pay into according to financial circumstances and liabilities under taxation law. VED is an excise duty not a road tax in that it is an ecise payment for use of a fossil fuel based initiall on cost then carbon emissions then value on a certain date IIRC. IT is not related to actual road use but use of an internal combustion engined vehicle. No doubt something similar will apply ot EVs in due course.
It would be fun to see a pay per mile road tax to come in where you pay according to wear and tear on the road that your mode of transportation causes. That of course would not stop the VED being applies as that is something different. So DM reading motorists will get stung twice when they use their vehicles. That would make me chuckle for days.
(Let's see if you got the reference in my last sentence!)
