
I found this:
"Even professionals, who ride their bikes for 20-30 hours a week use 2-6 degrees of float almost universally. Only some sprinters use 0 degrees of float, and several of them, including the likes of Greipel and Cavendish have stated that they don’t recommend it for anyone not concerned with absolute power output in a sprint, and that they do experience knee pain at times due to the locked in position".
It seems that being "locked in" is just not right and I agree. I found that at different parts of the pedal stroke, my foot is angled at different rotations on different parts of the full pedal stroke. The fact that the cleats "float" in this way is really important.
Then I realized, I have used flat pedals for my entire life until recently using cleats. On flat pedals, you don't have any heel rotation at all. This is an added benefit of cleats I never even thought about until using them. You are locked in as far as the crank rotation (vertically) but now on cleats your foot can rotate slightly (horizontally).
I ended up thinking "Yeah I'd never use cleats that don't allow horizontal rotation" but every single kid riding a BMX and most other people riding a bike, have no foot rotation because a flat pedal dictates that! I mean you could perhaps rotate your foot around when cycling on flat pedals but that would also mean your foot is not planted to the pedal, in fact far from it. I just never thought about this before using cycling shoes with cleats.
Maybe a lot of knee pain is being caused to a huge number of cyclists by using flat pedals or rather, pedals where you can't rotate your foot horizontally?
It's probably been invented already, but it wouldn't be that difficult to make a flat pedal that did this. There's no reason the platform can't "float" as if it was a cleat setup, but it's not clipless. Gap in the market? Should I have kept my mouth shut?

