The only cover of Cyclocross Nationals I could find yesterday was this teenager on YouTube. She puts British Cycling to shame who gave no coverage at all.
Shows that coverage doesn’t need to be slick and well presented. This Kirstie coverage reflects very much the experience of actually being there.
I’m going to give the girl a plug to thank her for her effort.
The World of Cycling according to Kirstie
The World of Cycling according to Kirstie
Whatever I am, wherever I am, this is me. This is my life
https://stcleve.wordpress.com/category/lejog/
E2E info
https://stcleve.wordpress.com/category/lejog/
E2E info
Re: The World of Cycling according to Kirstie
I will reserve comment on this until I've watched it! But I'll comment on the widespread ... "negativity" about the lack of officlal coverage. Two things mainly:
- If BC put something together, we'd all want something equivalent to BBC/Eurosport coverage. It would need to be soooooooo much better than something one amateur produced, else they would receive endless brickbats - a hiding to nothing.
- (You may have seen this post on Facebook,: ) a Nat's organiser from a few years back said they'd been quoted £100k for TV coverage. That's a huge amount of money that has to come from somewhere. british (small b) cycling is not a money tree.
Re: The World of Cycling according to Kirstie
I agree we would expect something better from BC. Personally I don’t expect a slick tv programme though. I only visit Fb on an absolute need basis so have not seen any comments on there.
100K though can’t be serious can it? I have no experience of these things but surely 4 guys with cameras in strategic places linked to the on course commentary, someone selecting cameras and a connection to YouTube can’t be much more than a couple of grand for the day.
I say cameras but I think at some point Kirstie coverage was purely by a phone.
100K though can’t be serious can it? I have no experience of these things but surely 4 guys with cameras in strategic places linked to the on course commentary, someone selecting cameras and a connection to YouTube can’t be much more than a couple of grand for the day.
I say cameras but I think at some point Kirstie coverage was purely by a phone.
Whatever I am, wherever I am, this is me. This is my life
https://stcleve.wordpress.com/category/lejog/
E2E info
https://stcleve.wordpress.com/category/lejog/
E2E info
Re: The World of Cycling according to Kirstie
Depends on who they asked. I could see the costs adding up to £100k for a high quality production.Paulatic wrote: ↑13 Jan 2025, 6:15pm I agree we would expect something better from BC. Personally I don’t expect a slick tv programme though. I only visit Fb on an absolute need basis so have not seen any comments on there.
100K though can’t be serious can it? I have no experience of these things but surely 4 guys with cameras in strategic places linked to the on course commentary, someone selecting cameras and a connection to YouTube can’t be much more than a couple of grand for the day.
I say cameras but I think at some point Kirstie coverage was purely by a phone.
It may be a 1 hour race, but that's probably 4 days of production equipment lease and staff costs - delivery, set up, event, tear down. Plus paying for power and connectivity in to a field that may not have it.
A novice learning...
“the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.”
“the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.”