Well there's your first mistake.
LLMs are known to hallucinate wildly... I've not even read the resulting verbal diarrhoea.
Well there's your first mistake.
I wouldn't trust it to tell me the size of a Marathon Supreme - let alone such a vague wide-ranging topic as at the start of this thread.roubaixtuesday wrote: ↑18 Feb 2025, 10:51amSorry, I was making a general point, not intended to be aimed at you. Apologies.Nearholmer wrote: ↑18 Feb 2025, 10:03am I never thought it was intelligent.
It sure as heck is biased though, even if only biased by the bias inherent in the source material it is crawling through.
Calling ChapGPT "AI" is highly misleading IMO
I think we're in agreement
It's a leading question. It didn't take the bait when I asked if Europe would be a better place today if Hitler had won the war, though.Nearholmer wrote: ↑18 Feb 2025, 10:03am It sure as heck is biased though, even if only biased by the bias inherent in the source material it is crawling through.
I wish they'd get on and do so - it's one of the potential major benefits that AI might bring, genuinely modular nuclear power would be a significant benefit... got a coal fired power plant you've just shut down? Park twenty containers outside and generate power for decades, replace one container each year for maintenance/refuelling at a dedicated site which also handles containers from all over the country.
And there's one of the dangers of trusting "AI".axel_knutt wrote: ↑18 Feb 2025, 12:13pm Culturally? There’s a mix of views—some appreciate reduced migration, while others feel less connected to Europe.
Which will likely become reality, such is the demand. New fossil fuel power stations are being built in Ireland purely to serve data centres,mattheus wrote: ↑18 Feb 2025, 12:10pm I wouldn't trust it to tell me the size of a Marathon Supreme - let alone such a vague wide-ranging topic as at the start of this thread.
(don't get me started on the extra resources used compared to regular web-searches. They're looking at mini-nuke power-plants for the server farms ... )
That also sounds a bit suspect. Home ownership was significantly lower then, and mortgages harder to obtain (at least until recently) which suggests that mortgages were not cheaper on a like for like basis. (I e. aside from the effects of lower risks due to more restricted eligibility).Manc33 wrote: ↑18 Feb 2025, 3:57pm People just had more spare money back then.
It all started when I asked it which year in the UK was the average salary the highest, compared to expenses being low in comparison to that salary, with everything considered like rent, mortgage, electric, gas, food, clothing etc and it answered with "1960"
Well <deep breath> ... your first part is just depressing (and confirms what I already knew). But I'm sure you were tyring to be helpful.Biospace wrote: ↑18 Feb 2025, 3:43pmWhich will likely become reality, such is the demand. New fossil fuel power stations are being built in Ireland purely to serve data centres,mattheus wrote: ↑18 Feb 2025, 12:10pm I wouldn't trust it to tell me the size of a Marathon Supreme - let alone such a vague wide-ranging topic as at the start of this thread.
(don't get me started on the extra resources used compared to regular web-searches. They're looking at mini-nuke power-plants for the server farms ... )
https://www.techerati.com/news-hub/micr ... -approved/ and
https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/n ... in-dublin/
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ ... sions-tech - "Data center emissions probably 662% higher than big tech claims"
Also -
There will be plenty who aren't aware of this, so although it's deeply depressing, people not knowing is even more depressing.mattheus wrote: ↑19 Feb 2025, 8:50am Well <deep breath> ... your first part is just depressing (and confirms what I already knew). But I'm sure you were tyring to be helpful.
The airfryer comment is also depressing, but wryly amusing. You'll be pleased to hear that we tape over the microphones on ALL our kitchen devices*, so we're doing our bit!
*Yes, including the nuclear oven.
Between 1966 and 2016, GDP per capita went up from £11,000 to £28,000 after inflation. People have far more now than they had 60 years ago, on average.