Retrospective insertion of spam links in posts

Anything about use of this forum : NOT about cycling
Post Reply
slowster
Moderator
Posts: 6392
Joined: 7 Jul 2017, 10:37am

Retrospective insertion of spam links in posts

Post by slowster »

This particular type of attempt to post spam on the forum has been discussed previously, e.g. viewtopic.php?t=147857, and is currently the subject of discussion and review among the moderators.

It just so happens that there is currently a new first post by very likely a spammer in this thread - viewtopic.php?t=165593. Although very few spammers get their first posts approved, it is largely impossible for the moderators to prevent 100% of such posts getting through.

I am making this post because:

a. Members might find it interesting to have an example of a post that got through the checks, and some may also find such an example useful in helping them to spot other spam posts in future. Obviously we want members to report such posts, including posts that are suspicious and have not (yet) had a spam link inserted in them.

b. It would be helpful if others kept an eye on the post for when the spam link gets inserted, and reported it when it happened. Ditto if this poster later inserts a link in any other posts they might make.

NB Please do not post on the thread in question drawing attention to the post or the poster, or post their user name in this thread, which could draw their attention to this thread.
User avatar
Cowsham
Posts: 7120
Joined: 4 Nov 2019, 1:33pm

Re: Retrospective insertion of spam links in posts

Post by Cowsham »

That poster has over 700 posts on this forum and joined in 2007 ???
"Lifted like a kite from the ground both wind and string we need."
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1687
Joined: 14 Dec 2006, 8:27pm
Location: Lancing, West Sussex
Contact:

Re: Retrospective insertion of spam links in posts

Post by admin »

Which one is the spammer? All those posts look legitimate to me.
Richard Fairhurst
Posts: 2179
Joined: 2 Mar 2008, 4:57pm
Location: Charlbury, Oxfordshire

Re: Retrospective insertion of spam links in posts

Post by Richard Fairhurst »

Second post. Yes, the post itself looks very AI-generated and if you google the poster's name it looks like you can find similar attempts on other forums.
cycle.travel - maps, journey-planner, route guides and city guides
User avatar
fatmac
Posts: 184
Joined: 5 Oct 2011, 7:42pm
Location: Surrey/Hants Border

Re: Retrospective insertion of spam links in posts

Post by fatmac »

Moderators should block the I.P. address of spammers. :wink:
Bikes, boots, & scoots...
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1687
Joined: 14 Dec 2006, 8:27pm
Location: Lancing, West Sussex
Contact:

Re: Retrospective insertion of spam links in posts

Post by admin »

Oh, we do, but unfortunately they have more than one IP address :wink:
User avatar
Cowsham
Posts: 7120
Joined: 4 Nov 2019, 1:33pm

Re: Retrospective insertion of spam links in posts

Post by Cowsham »

Richard Fairhurst wrote: 8 Jul 2025, 12:11pm Second post. Yes, the post itself looks very AI-generated and if you google the poster's name it looks like you can find similar attempts on other forums.
Ah
"Lifted like a kite from the ground both wind and string we need."
drossall
Posts: 6563
Joined: 5 Jan 2007, 10:01pm
Location: North Hertfordshire

Re: Retrospective insertion of spam links in posts

Post by drossall »

fatmac wrote: 8 Jul 2025, 3:11pm Moderators should block the I.P. address of spammers. :wink:
Fairly pointless exercise. Even on the same connection, IP addresses can change rapidly. And, if you try to block a group on the basis that a team are working on a set of connections, how wide do you cast the net?

No doubt it will be done anyway, but it's kind of a King Canute thing.
slowster
Moderator
Posts: 6392
Joined: 7 Jul 2017, 10:37am

Re: Retrospective insertion of spam links in posts

Post by slowster »

Rather than wait any longer for the poster referred to above to attempt to insert a spam link in their post, I have now banned them, since there is sufficient evidence that they are a spammer.
Post Reply