OK, so it seems that Navrig and I have different views on quoting, misquoting, and on journalism generally. But I'll try to summarise the key points:
In this Guardian article (
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/ ... ore-medals )
it's quite clear that riders were advised against certain processes.
There was no ban.
Equally I haven't seen any other source (if we exclude dramatic headline writers) that corrobarate any BC "ban". Here's the relevant text (direct copy-n-paste from the Grauniad):
Then there was the knotty problem of pubic hair removal. “The world‑class expert advice from a professor at Cambridge was that waxing and shaving didn’t help our fight against saddle issues,” says Burt.
Pubic hair helps with the transport and evaporation of sweat away from the skin. It also provides some friction protection. Hair removal methods such as shaving, depilatory creams or epilation create damage to the outer layer of the skin known as the epidermis and increase the risk of ingrowing hairs and hair follicle infections.
The women were strongly advised to stop shaving, waxing and depilating.
My bold, not the newspaper's.