Professional Advice

[thirdcrank]

Regulator

Sorry to be pedantic about this. Is what you refer to as the full report exactly that, or the edited version to which you referred earlier?

[Regulator]

Regulator

Sorry to be pedantic about this. Is what you refer to as the full report exactly that, or the edited version to which you referred earlier?

Sorry for the confusion - the report available on the CTC web-site is the edited version, which is what I linked to. I've also given the link for the 'Executive Summary' to the edited report.

The full report tht was received by Council has not been published.

[thirdcrank]

Regulator

Thanks for the clarification.

It seems to me that while there may be all sorts of reasons why the CTC Council may feel it necessary to publish an edited version - and "redacted" seems to be the vogue word for this sort of thing - I do think we are entitled to be informed by the people making it public what they have done. (If that caveat was shown, I certainly missed it.)

[gaz]

.

[Regulator]

Regulator

Thanks for the clarification.

It seems to me that while there may be all sorts of reasons why the CTC Council may feel it necessary to publish an edited version - and "redacted" seems to be the vogue word for this sort of thing - I do think we are entitled to be informed by the people making it public what they have done. (If that caveat was shown, I certainly missed it.)

I have spent the last 10 years using just such language... and I couldn't remember it earlier...