Bad traffic calming, what to do?

User avatar
robbo
Posts: 51
Joined: 12 Jan 2007, 3:29pm
Location: Barsac/Ulverston

Bad traffic calming, what to do?

Postby robbo » 15 Mar 2007, 1:18pm

Cumbria C.C. have just installed a chicane on an A road near here which as far as I can see from the DOT website is way below standard (no bypass for cyclists even though there is plenty of room). Already, within a week there have been several near misses of cyclists (and motor vehicles). So what can we do?

http://www.nwemail.co.uk/searchresults. ... rd=chicane

User avatar
Mick F
Spambuster
Posts: 50984
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 11:24am
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall

Postby Mick F » 15 Mar 2007, 1:46pm

Hi Robbo, just had a shufti at your link. Sometimes Councils need shooting!

I used to be on an action group, dedicated to looking into the calming and reduction of traffic through Gunnislake Village.

We looked into 'Traffic Calming' and 'Weight Restrictions', but we were thwarted at every turn, so to speak. A Roads can't be 'calmed' or 'restricted', we were told. We were fobbed off, eventually, that there were 'plans' to downgrade the road to a Class B.

We still wait. Meanwhile the action group disbanded.

Mick F. Cornwall

thirdcrank
Posts: 30857
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Postby thirdcrank » 15 Mar 2007, 10:09pm

robbo

It is often very difficult to alter something which has been installed, in my experience. It is, however, possible to ensure that the people responsible experience the disappointment, frustration, anger etc., that people feel when this sort of thing occurs. tHey may then be a little more cautious in future. I am not talking about direct action, personal abuse,or nastiness but if ever you are able to point to guidelines or standards that have not been met, then letters to MPs, councillors, council officers and all the rest, pointing out that there is supposed to be a national (and almost certainly local) policy to promote cycling and that for demonstrable reasons this is not the way to do it, then they may be more careful in future.

One thing about highwaymen is that they are so used to mindless, uninformed grumbling from motorists, that they are taken aback by sustained campaigning which simply draws their attention to traffic advisory leaflets, etc., and their inability or unwillingness to comply.

Most areas have a CTC Right to Ride rep., and it is important that you consult with them so that cyclists present a consistent message.

Finally, I presume you know for certain that the county council is responsible. Trunk roads (they now have another name like strategic road network or something) are the resposibility of the Highways Agency, a quango who do more or less as they like and who usually cannot even be bothered to pay lipservice to the promotion of cycling. In my opinion.

User avatar
robbo
Posts: 51
Joined: 12 Jan 2007, 3:29pm
Location: Barsac/Ulverston

Postby robbo » 30 Aug 2007, 7:46pm

The good news is it's been removed, at a reported cost of £50,000.