Regulator wrote:TonyR wrote:Psamathe wrote:The "personal comments" are just responding to a personal attack made by an individual - which seems perfectly reasonable
I'm glad you see it as perfectly reasonable that the CEO should finally respond with some personal comments to a string of attacks on him by Philip on Facebook, this forum, by email and elsewhere.
Care to provide some evidence of a "string of attacks on him [Paul Tuohy] by Philip on Facebook, this forum, by email and elsewhere"?
Although some of the worst abusive comments were sent to me as unsolicited email circulars I don't intend to breach the confidence of private communications. But you can find other examples such as:
"It is our opinion the entire decision-making process was flawed and any dissent was either ignored or shouted down. A similar technique was used regarding the governance issue, but more of that a little in the future."
viewtopic.php?f=48&t=103825&p=984255#p984255
"Does this mean PT has something about the night about him?"
viewtopic.php?f=48&t=103813&p=984143#p984143
"At agm will be the battle for governance this where the CEO will be packing the ctc council with yes men and women."
https://www.facebook.com/groups/9113225 ... nref=story
"CEO does not like to be criticized. ....... I suspect any critical motions CEO may try to be reject."
https://www.facebook.com/groups/9113225 ... nref=story