Folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk, folk.thirdcrank wrote: ↑16 Mar 2023, 9:55amI was about to mention "folk" as a synonym for "people" and it occurred to me I might have mentioned it before - and I have. And it continues to irritate methirdcrank wrote: ↑8 Jun 2022, 1:52pm My current Fowler says that "folk" as an ordinary word for people in general is tending to fall out of use in British English, except in northern England and Scotland, where it is standard. If that was so in 2015 when that was published, it no longer seems the case. I seem to see more of it than ever.
Oh. Sorry about that.