what in cycling should be put back?
what in cycling should be put back?
since the get rid of thread was so popular what about the things that should be put back?
I for one want the guards carriages put back on trains?
I for one want the guards carriages put back on trains?
Re: what in cycling should be put back?
The missing clearance between tyre and brake so that mudguards can once again be fitted routinely on all but genuine competition machines.
Re: what in cycling should be put back?
Goodwill between cyclists no matter what they ride, what they wear or what colour their shoes are 
Re: what in cycling should be put back?
Dave W wrote:Goodwill between cyclists no matter what they ride, what they wear or what colour their shoes are
A big +1 for that suggestion.
Re: what in cycling should be put back?
Sensible bicycles (mudguards, rear rack, sensible sized road tyres) being the rule rather than the exception.
Bicycles are largely seen as either a) a tool for the poorest to use with no love of the machine itself b) a toy for those with the money and mindset to lycra up of the weekend and pretend they are a professional racer; not a bad thing in and of itself, but it does perpetuate the idea of cycling as sport, as opposed to transport.
However, getting the average punter to buy a sensible bicycle is easier said than done.
Bicycles are largely seen as either a) a tool for the poorest to use with no love of the machine itself b) a toy for those with the money and mindset to lycra up of the weekend and pretend they are a professional racer; not a bad thing in and of itself, but it does perpetuate the idea of cycling as sport, as opposed to transport.
However, getting the average punter to buy a sensible bicycle is easier said than done.
Re: what in cycling should be put back?
My Harry Quinn should be put back at the rack it was stolen from in 1993 with a note of sincere apology 
-
eileithyia
- Posts: 8445
- Joined: 31 Jan 2007, 6:46pm
- Location: Horwich Which is Lancs :-)
Re: what in cycling should be put back?
The legs, lungs and fitness i had at 28.
Guards Vans.
Goodwill to all cyclists, inc from motorists.
Guards Vans.
Goodwill to all cyclists, inc from motorists.
I stand and rejoice everytime I see a woman ride by on a wheel the picture of free, untrammeled womanhood. HG Wells
-
greyingbeard
- Posts: 851
- Joined: 24 Mar 2015, 10:41pm
Re: what in cycling should be put back?
carbide lamps, keep hands warm in winter
Re: what in cycling should be put back?
Super durable square taper BBs and reversible last-forever Uniglide cassettes 
Progress, my foot!
Progress, my foot!
Re: what in cycling should be put back?
Dave W wrote:Goodwill between cyclists no matter what they ride, what they wear or what colour their shoes are
A big +1 for me too.
Re: what in cycling should be put back?
I wish the road traffic could be put back a couple of decades or so. - along with the YHA.
Cheers
J Bro
J Bro
Re: what in cycling should be put back?
There are plenty of bikes that can take full length mudguards and wide tyres so that's not really an issue imho
Triple STI shifters on the latest groupsets so you don't have to have ridiculously massive cassettes with unbearable jumps like on a Rohloff/Alfine when wanting lower gears.
Classy looking triple chainsets (like dura ace 7703 or 90s campag) but with 110/74mm bcd
Manufacturers to produce useable modern cassettes that aren't limited to an 11 or 12t starting sprocket, a 13-30 or 14-32 11speed cassette would be great.
The big 3 to produce individual sprocket sizes to make your own cassette without it costing a ridiculous sum or resorting to a differing manufacturers kit that are either spendy or made of material that is too soft.
Making cycling on road 'feel' accessible and a viable safe option to travel/get to work/school etc for everyone including disabled.
Put back not needing unprovable plastic/foam/reflective/coloured materials to be safe.
Triple STI shifters on the latest groupsets so you don't have to have ridiculously massive cassettes with unbearable jumps like on a Rohloff/Alfine when wanting lower gears.
Classy looking triple chainsets (like dura ace 7703 or 90s campag) but with 110/74mm bcd
Manufacturers to produce useable modern cassettes that aren't limited to an 11 or 12t starting sprocket, a 13-30 or 14-32 11speed cassette would be great.
The big 3 to produce individual sprocket sizes to make your own cassette without it costing a ridiculous sum or resorting to a differing manufacturers kit that are either spendy or made of material that is too soft.
Making cycling on road 'feel' accessible and a viable safe option to travel/get to work/school etc for everyone including disabled.
Put back not needing unprovable plastic/foam/reflective/coloured materials to be safe.
Re: what in cycling should be put back?
Tonyf33 wrote:There are plenty of bikes that can take full length mudguards and wide tyres so that's not really an issue imho
For those in the know, no. For the beginner who's just been sold a bike that's a nuisance to commute on it does make a difference. How many of those threads do we have on here? (EDIT: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=103778)
So maybe it isn't the lack of availability, but how bikes are sold.
Last edited by Bicycler on 17 Feb 2016, 10:41am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: what in cycling should be put back?
Winged Wheel patches, stickers, & badges that you don't have to be high bidder on eb to get!
Re: what in cycling should be put back?
Roads without potholes - I suspect many on this forum are too young to remember.