pwa wrote:pete75 wrote:I suppose it depends on whether or not you think waging wars of conquest on other nations, slaughtering their people and then setting yourself up to rule is a good thing to do.
I think we all agree that it is not. But then certain legacies of the British Empire have helped nations that were once part of the Empire. Nobody here, I think, would defend all the things done in the name of Empire, but we can see that India has continued some British traditions that have helped to maintain stability (after initial conflict over boundaries) and enable recent improvement in fortunes. By accident or design the Empire did leave some good things behind. I will leave it to the individual to decide whether cricket is one of them.
I don't deny there may have been good side effects but the question is, I think, was the empire as a whole a force for good. If you start fro the basic premise it's wrong to attack and conquer other countries then, as an edifice based on wars of conquest, the empire was wrong regardless of any seemingly desirable side effects.