Ben@Forest wrote:I can't help but notice that you're posting from a country which has rejected (by referendum) EU membership twice. And apparently there's still only around 30% who would vote to join.
I'm British. This makes me a "bleedin' immigrent" with no rights to influence a referendum here in Norway should the Norwegian people decide to consider the question again.
As you probably know Norway is a member of the EEA. This puts it is a very weak position compared to the pre-Brexit position the UK was in. As an EEA member you are required to implement all the directives created by the EU. But as an EEA member you have pretty much no influence as to the contents of those directives. You will be asked to make representations but have no rights beyond that. So EEA countries really get a much worse deal than full EU members.
Norway is a Schengen country and allows free movement of people from EU and EEA countries. So again, different to the pre-Brexit situation that the UK was in. This means also that Norwegians have the same basic rights to seek work in other countries as nationals from EU member states.
Personally I feel that an independent Scotland would be in a much better position as a member of the EU than an EEA member. Norway on the other hand is stuck between a rock and a hard place. For starters, farming would be in trouble if Norwegian subsidies were replaced with CAP ones. This is not the case for Scotland which already receives CAP subsidies.
So long and thanks for all the fish...