Thanks for the Wind Farms
Re: Thanks for the Wind Farms
Battery storage may go a small way to ameliorating the storage problem - in no way is it a solution.
Re: Thanks for the Wind Farms
I have not been through al the posts so may have missed a reference to tidal energy which is sadly neglected. There are a few generators working around Orkney and the Pentland Firth with a fair amount of success. There was one anchored at the seaward side of the Connel Ferry bridge for a while for testing. Tests must have been successful as it went off to I think Indonesia.
The government seems biased against tidal for some reason as it seems a sensible and reliable solution.
The government seems biased against tidal for some reason as it seems a sensible and reliable solution.
Re: Thanks for the Wind Farms
A solution would be a solution to the problem of energy storage with intermittent energy supply.
We don't have storage which could provide 10% of our electrical demand over several days and with energy supplies such as wind we could easily lose that in still conditions.
Battery storage may provide that for a short period but it isn't a solution if still conditions last for a few days.
Re: Thanks for the Wind Farms
Thanks.
So there's currently (!) not enough storage, but batteries could contribute?
Jonathan
So there's currently (!) not enough storage, but batteries could contribute?
Jonathan
Re: Thanks for the Wind Farms
"UK government announces biggest investment into Britain’s tidal power":ambodach wrote: ↑21 Jan 2022, 3:00pm I have not been through al the posts so may have missed a reference to tidal energy which is sadly neglected. There are a few generators working around Orkney and the Pentland Firth with a fair amount of success. There was one anchored at the seaward side of the Connel Ferry bridge for a while for testing. Tests must have been successful as it went off to I think Indonesia.
The government seems biased against tidal for some reason as it seems a sensible and reliable solution.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-g ... idal-power
£20M/y. I have no idea how much of this is new money. Nor whether we should be spending more on it.
Jonathan
-
- Posts: 5818
- Joined: 18 Aug 2015, 7:05pm
Re: Thanks for the Wind Farms
AIUI not only are those generators are very small scale (the much touted "world's biggest" is just 2MW) but the total potential of such in the UK is small.ambodach wrote: ↑21 Jan 2022, 3:00pm I have not been through al the posts so may have missed a reference to tidal energy which is sadly neglected. There are a few generators working around Orkney and the Pentland Firth with a fair amount of success. There was one anchored at the seaward side of the Connel Ferry bridge for a while for testing. Tests must have been successful as it went off to I think Indonesia.
The government seems biased against tidal for some reason as it seems a sensible and reliable solution.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co ... 991351.amp
For tidal to be a significant contributor you need a scheme like Swansea Bay, or the mooted Severn Barrage, where huge artificial lagoons are created.
Such schemes are hugely expensive and create significant environmental damage.
Swansea Bay was estimated at £1.3bn for 320 MW. Wind is much cheaper.
A Severn Barrage would be in the 10s of billions.
Re: Thanks for the Wind Farms
Thankyou for the numbers.
Jonathan
Jonathan
Re: Thanks for the Wind Farms
Yes - but not enough to replace 10% of capacity.
To give the output of a 2GW conventional power station over 24hrs would require 48GWhr of battery capacity.
An EV with a longer than usual range would have a battery of around 90kWhr.
Half a million or so would suffice - if 24hrs is long enough.
I'm rather pessimistic about the long term if we continue on a zero carbon non nuclear path.
Re: Thanks for the Wind Farms
The Scottish government has been investing but this "new" money comes from Westminster presumably. It could just be smoke and mirrors so need to wait and see.Jdsk wrote: ↑21 Jan 2022, 3:46pm"UK government announces biggest investment into Britain’s tidal power":ambodach wrote: ↑21 Jan 2022, 3:00pm I have not been through al the posts so may have missed a reference to tidal energy which is sadly neglected. There are a few generators working around Orkney and the Pentland Firth with a fair amount of success. There was one anchored at the seaward side of the Connel Ferry bridge for a while for testing. Tests must have been successful as it went off to I think Indonesia.
The government seems biased against tidal for some reason as it seems a sensible and reliable solution.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-g ... idal-power
£20M/y. I have no idea how much of this is new money. Nor whether we should be spending more on it.
Jonathan
Re: Thanks for the Wind Farms
I would argue that tidal power is potentially of great importance. Places with good tidal flows such as Pentland Firth or Menai Straits have potential for expansion to much bigger projects without the need for barrages which in any case are unpopular with the public.roubaixtuesday wrote: ↑21 Jan 2022, 3:47pmAIUI not only are those generators are very small scale (the much touted "world's biggest" is just 2MW) but the total potential of such in the UK is small.ambodach wrote: ↑21 Jan 2022, 3:00pm I have not been through al the posts so may have missed a reference to tidal energy which is sadly neglected. There are a few generators working around Orkney and the Pentland Firth with a fair amount of success. There was one anchored at the seaward side of the Connel Ferry bridge for a while for testing. Tests must have been successful as it went off to I think Indonesia.
The government seems biased against tidal for some reason as it seems a sensible and reliable solution.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co ... 991351.amp
For tidal to be a significant contributor you need a scheme like Swansea Bay, or the mooted Severn Barrage, where huge artificial lagoons are created.
Such schemes are hugely expensive and create significant environmental damage.
Swansea Bay was estimated at £1.3bn for 320 MW. Wind is much cheaper.
A Severn Barrage would be in the 10s of billions.
There was one proposed for somewhere in southern England but public opinion was very much against it and the scheme was dropped.
-
- Posts: 5818
- Joined: 18 Aug 2015, 7:05pm
Re: Thanks for the Wind Farms
What is "much bigger"? Quantification is everything!ambodach wrote: ↑21 Jan 2022, 6:15pmI would argue that tidal power is potentially of great importance. Places with good tidal flows such as Pentland Firth or Menai Straits have potential for expansion to much bigger projects without the need for barrages which in any case are unpopular with the public.roubaixtuesday wrote: ↑21 Jan 2022, 3:47pmAIUI not only are those generators are very small scale (the much touted "world's biggest" is just 2MW) but the total potential of such in the UK is small.ambodach wrote: ↑21 Jan 2022, 3:00pm I have not been through al the posts so may have missed a reference to tidal energy which is sadly neglected. There are a few generators working around Orkney and the Pentland Firth with a fair amount of success. There was one anchored at the seaward side of the Connel Ferry bridge for a while for testing. Tests must have been successful as it went off to I think Indonesia.
The government seems biased against tidal for some reason as it seems a sensible and reliable solution.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co ... 991351.amp
For tidal to be a significant contributor you need a scheme like Swansea Bay, or the mooted Severn Barrage, where huge artificial lagoons are created.
Such schemes are hugely expensive and create significant environmental damage.
Swansea Bay was estimated at £1.3bn for 320 MW. Wind is much cheaper.
A Severn Barrage would be in the 10s of billions.
There was one proposed for somewhere in southern England but public opinion was very much against it and the scheme was dropped.
Interested to hear why public opinion would be against such projects too. Makes no sense to me, but there's always some reason to oppose such, I guess.
Re: Thanks for the Wind Farms
There is a price to pay for all energy projects.roubaixtuesday wrote: ↑21 Jan 2022, 7:14pm
Interested to hear why public opinion would be against such projects too. Makes no sense to me, but there's always some reason to oppose such, I guess.
Renewables such as tidal require large areas of storage and involve massive works and materials to be constructed.
The energy stored isn't great in terms of the area of water/land required due to the relatively low head of water compared with something like Dinorwic.
There is an inevitable loss of wild life habitat. There are objectors of course.
France has had a tidal scheme on the west coast for decades. Presumably they could have built more.
Perhaps fortunately for us they chose to invest in nuclear and we have been able to purchase their surplus for some time.
If I recall correctly the original link (Sellinge to Les Attaques) was meant to be a reciprocal arrangement to allow for the different periods of peak demand between the two countries.