Bonefishblues wrote:The battle had been lost in his party. He is the occupant of a marginal seat. He is a distinguished Victorian scholar. The job of jobs comes up. He takes it. What's to debate?
Within the art world what's to debate, and what's being debated, is
he is a historian, not an art historian or a design historian. Big difference, actually, before anyone asks
AFAI can find out, he has no qualifications for running a museum (yes, they do exist) or in conservation, museum education or in any relevant area of museum work
he has absolutely no experience of running any kind of museum or gallery
he has absolutely no experience of running a business