Rolling Resistance measured on road

For discussions about bikes and equipment.
Brucey
Posts: 46822
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Rolling Resistance measured on road

Post by Brucey »

I did mention that upthread; the first objective would be to measure the drag force of the tyre. The second would be to vary the way the load is coupled through the tyre. The third (and probably most difficult) would be to work out what kind of coupling is actually representative of a real rider on a real bike; frames and forks vary, and even how folk sit on the bike/hold the bars can change things.

Not sure about tanks of water; the tanks themselves (even if full) need to be much stiffer than you might think if they are not to flex in potentially unexpected ways.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sid Aluminium
Posts: 255
Joined: 26 Feb 2019, 7:38pm
Location: Beyond the edge of the wild

Re: Rolling Resistance measured on road

Post by Sid Aluminium »

Do I recall...Dr. Moulton studying rolling resistance in a blimp hangar to mitigate wind variation?

Also through the fog, I seem to remember a test some 40 years ago where a group of professors & students studying bicycle tire rolling resistance built an instrumented teardrop-shaped cart (no rider) to roll down a slope.
User avatar
squeaker
Posts: 4152
Joined: 12 Jan 2007, 11:43pm
Location: Sussex

Re: Rolling Resistance measured on road

Post by squeaker »

Sid Aluminium wrote:Do I recall...Dr. Moulton studying rolling resistance in a blimp hangar to mitigate wind variation?

Also through the fog, I seem to remember a test some 40 years ago where a group of professors & students studying bicycle tire rolling resistance built an instrumented teardrop-shaped cart (no rider) to roll down a slope.


If you're that interested in test methods and environmental effects, then take a read of Wim Schermer's blog and his novel pendulum test method. Mostly x 405 and x 559 tyres though.
"42"
Post Reply