Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

General cycling advice ( NOT technical ! )
Mike Sales
Posts: 8324
Joined: 7 Mar 2009, 3:31pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Mike Sales »

drossall wrote:Most people I knew ended up buying Wonder because Ever Ready never were.


Better than NeverReady is a definition of damning with faint praise.
It's the same the whole world over
It's the poor what gets the blame
It's the rich what gets the pleasure
Isn't it a blooming shame?
Brucey
Posts: 46529
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Brucey »

Image

cynics might claim that Fignon's success may have been as much to do with different sorts of 'gear' he was using (vetinary meds can be strong old stuff...) but there is an underlying truth remaining unsaid; despite various sponsorship deals and 'Team X use brand Y groupsets and equipment' the reality was that the bulk of the peloton was using sedisport chains and a lot of riders with Campagnolo groupsets had quietly fitted simplex SLJ retrofriction gear levers to their bikes. For example

Image

SLJ gear levers mixed in with the campagnolo groupset there on Phil Andersons bike.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Brucey
Posts: 46529
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Brucey »

Image

from 1895 (above) and 1894 (below)

Image

ever wanted something that looks like a runaway bonfire on your bike?

Image

Image

'side visibility' isn't a new thing in bike lights; many from this period have something rather than nothing. However the lamp above has red and green jewels set in the side, for port and starboard respectively. Presumably in flood conditions a bicycle must observe rules of navigation... :wink:

Image
1897
Last edited by Brucey on 3 Mar 2020, 8:36am, edited 4 times in total.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Brucey
Posts: 46529
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Brucey »

Image

'sprocketman' first appeared in 1975 as part of a Stanford University safety scheme and has recently been resurrected.

You can read more here

https://transportation.stanford.edu/bicycle/about-the-bicycle-program/meet-sprocket-man

including pdfs of sprocketman comics.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Brucey
Posts: 46529
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Brucey »

Image

un peu d'air sur terre ….

et deux chainrings on the wrong side....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Brucey
Posts: 46529
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Brucey »

Image

I wonder how many kids came to grief trying to emulate this?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Brucey
Posts: 46529
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Brucey »

Image

given that they revised the Super Record after quite a short period of time, it turned out to be more 'the penultimate derailleur'....?

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drossall
Posts: 6394
Joined: 5 Jan 2007, 10:01pm
Location: North Hertfordshire

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by drossall »

Nothing else quite has the look though...
Brucey
Posts: 46529
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Brucey »

drossall wrote:Nothing else quite has the look though...


This one is preferred by many;
Image
and there are small but potentially important practical differences, e.g.

- slightly increased capacity
- elevated outer guide plate so that reluctant downshifts can be forced if necessary
- revised pulley fastenings which won't strip the holes in the inner guide plate

However cynics -or are they pragmatists?- will note that a contemporaneous SunTour Cyclone weighs less and shifts better.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
freiston
Posts: 1644
Joined: 6 Oct 2013, 10:20am
Location: Coventry

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by freiston »

Brucey wrote:Image

I wonder how many kids came to grief trying to emulate this?

My first ever bike was a Triumph Rodeo (second hand - times were hard). I do recall previous fruitless searches the internet for any information on it - so I am glad that you posted this. I'm sure that I did do something similar to the lad in the advert and I'm sure that I fell off a few times too.
Disclaimer: Treat what I say with caution and if possible, wait for someone with more knowledge and experience to contribute. ;)
Brucey
Posts: 46529
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Brucey »

this is the (slightly worrying, single brake) export model.

Image

Although the frameset is drawn in the ad with a very gradual curve in the top tube, this is artistic licence; in reality it is more of a kink. I would cynically suppose that this would make it dead easy to make, perhaps using the readily available seat lugs which were (I think) then used on GPO bikes amongst others...?.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
freiston
Posts: 1644
Joined: 6 Oct 2013, 10:20am
Location: Coventry

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by freiston »

Cheers :D
Disclaimer: Treat what I say with caution and if possible, wait for someone with more knowledge and experience to contribute. ;)
Brucey
Posts: 46529
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Brucey »

it is interesting to note that the 'dynohub' lighting option cost almost 10/- more than the 'three speed hub' option on the 'rodeo'. I'd have guessed the other way round perhaps.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
Mick F
Spambuster
Posts: 56390
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 11:24am
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Mick F »

Brucey wrote:Image

un peu d'air sur terre ….

et deux chainrings on the wrong side....
If you zoom in, it's strange that only the lead bicycle has the chainring correct.
The other two are wrong.

Could this photo be "photoshopped" and combined out of more than one photograph?
Mick F. Cornwall
Brucey
Posts: 46529
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Brucey »

in days gone by I would have said this was most likely all the work of an airbrush, from a montage of photos. These days it may have never left the computer, to much the same effect.

The shadows aren't quite right either, presumably for much the same reason.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Post Reply