Page 15 of 91
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
Posted: 25 Nov 2019, 2:40pm
by Cyril Haearn
Mike Sales wrote:Completely irrelevant and off topic, but when the title of this thread caught my eye again I realised that "Old Harry" is one of the names of The Lord of the Flies, Old Nick, Beelzebub, Lucifer, Asmodeus.
His name is Henry actually

Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
Posted: 25 Nov 2019, 3:40pm
by Mike Sales
Cyril Haearn wrote:Mike Sales wrote:Completely irrelevant and off topic, but when the title of this thread caught my eye again I realised that "Old Harry" is one of the names of The Lord of the Flies, Old Nick, Beelzebub, Lucifer, Asmodeus.
His name is Henry actually

Archangel Lucifer originally, before his fall.
Means "bearer of light."
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
Posted: 25 Nov 2019, 4:19pm
by mercalia
Mike Sales wrote:Cyril Haearn wrote:Mike Sales wrote:Completely irrelevant and off topic, but when the title of this thread caught my eye again I realised that "Old Harry" is one of the names of The Lord of the Flies, Old Nick, Beelzebub, Lucifer, Asmodeus.
His name is Henry actually

Archangel Lucifer originally, before his fall.
Means "bearer of light."
alias Cummins or what ever his name is
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
Posted: 25 Nov 2019, 4:40pm
by Cyril Haearn
mercalia wrote:Mike Sales wrote:Cyril Haearn wrote:His name is Henry actually

Archangel Lucifer originally, before his fall.
Means "bearer of light."
alias Cummins or what ever his name is
'There is something of the night about him'
Who said that of whom?

Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
Posted: 25 Nov 2019, 4:41pm
by Oldjohnw
mercalia wrote:Mike Sales wrote:Cyril Haearn wrote:His name is Henry actually

Archangel Lucifer originally, before his fall.
Means "bearer of light."
alias Cummins or what ever his name is
And early matches were known as lucifers. Cummings, however, has nothing to do with the light but has something of the night about him.
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
Posted: 25 Nov 2019, 4:54pm
by Mike Sales
Cyril Haearn wrote:'There is something of the night about him'
Who said that of whom?

Widdecombe of Michael Howard.
What has happened to him? Stake through the heart?
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
Posted: 25 Nov 2019, 4:58pm
by mercalia
if yiou want proof of cummings look at this picture

see the eyes, satanic red eyes if ever there was
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/devils-parade-in-krampus-procession-134860257-59dfec7503f402001012f1a9.jpg)
He is atleast a demon?
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
Posted: 3 Dec 2019, 8:17pm
by dim
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
Posted: 4 Dec 2019, 2:10pm
by Psamathe
Oldjohnw wrote:Polisman wrote:Andrew withdrawing from 230 charities. Holy moly, this is big stuff. :shock:
And what on earth did he do for 230 charities apart from having his name on the letter head?
You (indirectly) raise an important issue. Getting letterhead, publicity, ads, brochures, websites, etc. changed costs money. Charities are meant to spend their resources on good works for their chosen sector NOT spending their money on the fall-out of a prince gone bad. Should he not be paying for all this from his own pocket (which at the end of the day is our pockets anyway). Which maybe illustrates just how daft the kings & queens & subjects system really is.
Ian
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
Posted: 4 Dec 2019, 3:00pm
by mattheus
Psamathe wrote:Oldjohnw wrote:Polisman wrote:Andrew withdrawing from 230 charities. Holy moly, this is big stuff.

And what on earth did he do for 230 charities apart from having his name on the letter head?
You (indirectly) raise an important issue. Getting letterhead, publicity, ads, brochures, websites, etc. changed costs money. Charities are meant to spend their resources on good works for their chosen sector NOT spending their money on the fall-out of a prince gone bad.
Should he not be paying for all this from his own pocket (which at the end of the day is our pockets anyway).
Ian
Are you serious??
The charity PR teams made a judgement that he'd be good for them. They got it wrong.
What next: compensation payouts to Royalists who are a bit upset that Prince Andy isn't perfect after all?
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
Posted: 25 Dec 2019, 10:24am
by NATURAL ANKLING
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
Posted: 25 Dec 2019, 11:23am
by mercalia

What an unhappy pair they look, she looks a frump he a store display dummy
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
Posted: 25 Dec 2019, 1:05pm
by Cunobelin
Cyril Haearn wrote:mercalia wrote:Mike Sales wrote:
Archangel Lucifer originally, before his fall.
Means "bearer of light."
alias Cummins or what ever his name is
'There is something of the night about him'
Who said that of whom?

Wasn’t that said about Mandelson ?
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
Posted: 25 Dec 2019, 1:30pm
by Mike Sales
Cunobelin wrote:Cyril Haearn wrote:mercalia wrote:alias Cummins or what ever his name is
'There is something of the night about him'
Who said that of whom?

Wasn’t that said about Mandelson ?
Widdecombe about Michael Howard.
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
Posted: 25 Dec 2019, 5:54pm
by mattheus
mercalia wrote:https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NINTCHDBPICT000499466942.jpg?w=620
What an unhappy pair they look, she looks a frump he a store display dummy
Christmas Day and you're getting your kicks from being rude about pictures of complete strangers in The Sun.