Driving along The Mall, eh? That's pretty direct! I wonder if Her Maj was watching the bus from an upstairs window?Psamathe wrote:https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/prince-andrew-school-bus-paedophile-fbi-jeffrey-epstein-investigation-gloria-allred-london-a9350891.html wrote:‘Call the FBI’: Prince Andrew targeted by school bus with giant picture of his face driving around London
The "Royals" Thread
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
Suppose that this room is a lift. The support breaks and down we go with ever-increasing velocity.
Let us pass the time by performing physical experiments...
--- Arthur Eddington (creator of the Eddington Number).
Let us pass the time by performing physical experiments...
--- Arthur Eddington (creator of the Eddington Number).
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
661-Pete wrote:Driving along The Mall, eh? That's pretty direct! I wonder if Her Maj was watching the bus from an upstairs window?Psamathe wrote:https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/prince-andrew-school-bus-paedophile-fbi-jeffrey-epstein-investigation-gloria-allred-london-a9350891.html wrote:‘Call the FBI’: Prince Andrew targeted by school bus with giant picture of his face driving around London
her servants have been reported as hearing her saying "we are not amused"
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
I see that despite previously saying he was “willing to help any appropriate law enforcement agency with their investigations if required”. Randy Andy is now refusing to cooperate with US investigators into the Jeffrey Epstein case
So they [Royals] seem to regard laws and legal process as beneath them; and we are paying for them.
Ian
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-us-inquiry-a9389201.html wrote:Prince Andrew won’t voluntarily cooperate in Epstein inquiry, says US prosecutor
...
Prince Andrew has “completely shut the door” on cooperating with investigators in the Jeffrey Epstein case, US lawyer Geoffrey Berman said.
The prince previously commented in November that he was “willing to help any appropriate law enforcement agency with their investigations if required”.
...
The prosecutor said: “Contrary to Prince Andrew’s very public offer to cooperate with our investigation into Epstein’s co-conspirators, an offer that was conveyed via press release, Prince Andrew has now completely shut the door on voluntary cooperation and our office is considering its options.”
So they [Royals] seem to regard laws and legal process as beneath them; and we are paying for them.
Ian
- NATURAL ANKLING
- Posts: 13779
- Joined: 24 Oct 2012, 10:43pm
- Location: English Riviera
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
Hi,
Without his silence and denial he will simply be torn to shreds.
I have no doubt that he will be protected to the hilt by the Royals and even our own government law et cetera.
He will simply have to remain in privacy for his own good.
His words that stick in my mind are Words to this effect – "in hindsight I would still have known him "
Without his silence and denial he will simply be torn to shreds.
I have no doubt that he will be protected to the hilt by the Royals and even our own government law et cetera.
He will simply have to remain in privacy for his own good.
His words that stick in my mind are Words to this effect – "in hindsight I would still have known him "
NA Thinks Just End 2 End Return + Bivvy - Some day Soon I hope
You'll Still Find Me At The Top Of A Hill
Please forgive the poor Grammar I blame it on my mobile and phat thinkers.
You'll Still Find Me At The Top Of A Hill
Please forgive the poor Grammar I blame it on my mobile and phat thinkers.
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
Psamathe wrote:I see that despite previously saying he was “willing to help any appropriate law enforcement agency with their investigations if required”. Randy Andy is now refusing to cooperate with US investigators into the Jeffrey Epstein case
It's just a variation of "better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than open it and remove all doubt" (But with more sexual content)
After his last attempt at opening his mouth can you blame him?
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
kwackers wrote:Psamathe wrote:I see that despite previously saying he was “willing to help any appropriate law enforcement agency with their investigations if required”. Randy Andy is now refusing to cooperate with US investigators into the Jeffrey Epstein case
It's just a variation of "better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than open it and remove all doubt" (But with more sexual content)
After his last attempt at opening his mouth can you blame him?
you got it right.
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
NATURAL ANKLING wrote:Hi,
Without his silence and denial he will simply be torn to shreds.
I have no doubt that he will be protected to the hilt by the Royals and even our own government law et cetera.
He will simply have to remain in privacy for his own good.
His words that stick in my mind are Words to this effect – "in hindsight I would still have known him "
that was rather astonishing. They say that "hindsight is always 20:20", but special people make exceptions, it seems ...
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
mattheus wrote:NATURAL ANKLING wrote:Hi,
Without his silence and denial he will simply be torn to shreds.
I have no doubt that he will be protected to the hilt by the Royals and even our own government law et cetera.
He will simply have to remain in privacy for his own good.
His words that stick in my mind are Words to this effect – "in hindsight I would still have known him "
that was rather astonishing. They say that "hindsight is always 20:20", but special people make exceptions, it seems ...
well thats 2 of the royals out of the way now? Mehgan/Harry and also Andrew. Thats good news. Now just William /Kate and Charlie Boy
Re: The "Royals" Thread ( was Poor Old Harry or Andy)
mercalia wrote:well thats 2 of the royals out of the way now? Mehgan/Harry and also Andrew. Thats good news. Now just William /Kate and Charlie Boy
I know they're related (though possibly not by blood), but I won't be grouping Andrew with Harry/William in any other way. They behave like different species.
Re: The "Royals" Thread
Maybe, but what with 'democracy' becoming so flawed and toxic in these enlightened days of ours (see other threads) - maybe it's time to return to an Absolute Monarchy à la Charles I et al. Anyone buy into that
? Would Charles III fit the bill as Absolute Monarch? There are some things I like about the chap (whilst I can't say much for Liz & co.).
Of course there's always the risk of a latter-day Cromwell II (should that be "Cromwell III"?) rearing his ugly head...
(N.B. I'm posting this from the position of a committed republican...
)
Of course there's always the risk of a latter-day Cromwell II (should that be "Cromwell III"?) rearing his ugly head...
(N.B. I'm posting this from the position of a committed republican...
Suppose that this room is a lift. The support breaks and down we go with ever-increasing velocity.
Let us pass the time by performing physical experiments...
--- Arthur Eddington (creator of the Eddington Number).
Let us pass the time by performing physical experiments...
--- Arthur Eddington (creator of the Eddington Number).
Re: The "Royals" Thread
I see that HM the Q did her weekly Johnson audience by phone.
Sounds like a plan. Retreat to one of your palaces with your servants. Acres to walk around.
Sounds like a plan. Retreat to one of your palaces with your servants. Acres to walk around.
John
-
Ben@Forest
- Posts: 3645
- Joined: 28 Jan 2013, 5:58pm
Re: The "Royals" Thread
Oldjohnw wrote:I see that HM the Q did her weekly Johnson audience by phone.
Sounds like a plan. Retreat to one of your palaces with your servants. Acres to walk around.
And if they'd met directly you, or some other contrarian, would tell us they weren't heeding the government's own advice.
Re: The "Royals" Thread
so the queen has left plague city for rural Windsor earlier than usual.
Re: The "Royals" Thread
Ben@Forest wrote:
And if they'd met directly you, or some other contrarian, would tell us they weren't heeding the government's own advice.
What advise have they gone against?
Maybe she’s been tipped off there will be lock down in London next week?
Whatever I am, wherever I am, this is me. This is my life
https://stcleve.wordpress.com/category/lejog/
E2E info
https://stcleve.wordpress.com/category/lejog/
E2E info
Re: The "Royals" Thread
so meg and harry have moved to the USA and trump has said we aint paying for your security
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-52086992
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-52086992