simonineaston wrote: ↑25 Jul 2022, 7:35pm
Which politician is going to propose complusory, reversible sterilisation
No need. The problem is self-solving. After-all, we have
zero rights. Such as we
think we have, exist soley in our minds... As climate change ramps up and it becomes increasingly obvious we are fighting for our lives, just watch those "rights" disappear like Scotch mist...
"Natural Rights" - a quaint notion dreamt up by some humans that believe there's only one kind of right human and one right way for it to behave. I recall that they had the idea from their god-book, failing to realise that their god is also a human mental construction, along with the book. Pure Scottish mist.
"Human rights" - similar to the above but at least a recognition that the rights have to be made actual with ...
"Legal Rights" - the only meaningful kind in that they're artificial constructs of humans in a polity with actual means to implement them, police them and otherwise make them "real".
Sadly, legal rights are also a bit scottish misty as polities can allow gharks & hoos into power, which they then employ to get rid of not just the rights but the legal system implementing them. (For details, see Bokum & familiars). Also, Putin and similar creatures have instruments that can flatten the legal rights of any polity he don't like the look of. He practices getting rid of legal rights within his own domain first.
********
It's an old one but still worth considering: the tiger couldn't give a fig for our rights - natural, human, legal or any other kind - when she's hungry and we're the nearest dinner. The tiger is just one armature of Momma Nature, a merciless mammy not inclined to indulge her noisome brats. We're all doomed!
Cugel the Harbinger, hoping The Doom arrives later rather than sooner (but arrive it will).
“Practical men who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence are usually the slaves of some defunct economist”.
John Maynard Keynes