Covid-19 : 2nd Lockdown 2020 : 3rd Lockdown 2021

Use this board for general non-cycling-related chat, or to introduce yourself to the forum.
kwackers
Posts: 15643
Joined: 4 Jun 2008, 9:29pm
Location: Warrington

Re: WInter 2020 : Covid-19 : 2nd Lockdown

Post by kwackers »

Vorpal wrote:Firstly, people in isolation still need groceries, to attend GP appointments, etc. Even if they avoid dining out, hair cuts, indoor exercise and other risks, and they have reduced their risk as much as possible, they can still get it. They are much more likely to if the disease is spreading uncontrolled throughout the population. If they are in a care home, they are likely to be exposed through the staff. It is much better for us and vulnerable members of the population to reduce the risk of it spreading.

Secondly, even those who are not 'vulnerable' due to pre-existing conditions or age can still become very ill or die. There is furthermore the risk of 'long covid' which seems to be more prevalent in younger people. https://www.theguardian.com/society/202 ... s-uk-study

So, more than 20% of people who get it have symptoms for more than 1 month. Not everyone wants to risk that, even if they are not 'vulnerable'.

Don't forget the pressure put on older people to look after their disease ridden grandsprogs whilst their parents are working.
I suspect that was a major cause of the start of the last wave (which iirc began in the over 60's).
peetee
Posts: 4593
Joined: 4 May 2010, 10:20pm
Location: Upon a lumpy, scarred granite massif.

Re: WInter 2020 : Covid-19 : 2nd Lockdown

Post by peetee »

The restrictions imposed over the lockdown periods have been a right old mish-mash of rules and advice and it’s no surprise that a very large proportion of the population either don’t understand or have given up the will to do so.
It must be a difficult choice for the government, lead as it is by the highest priority; spending. Do they introduce draconian measures and loose money (ie taxes) by strangling business or do they relax measures and loose money by bailing out a spiralling NHS budget?
The older I get the more I’m inclined to act my shoe size, not my age.
Psamathe
Posts: 18963
Joined: 10 Jan 2014, 8:56pm

Re: Next lockdown, due to C19...

Post by Psamathe »

gbnz wrote:
[XAP]Bob wrote:
gbnz wrote:It's absurd that I should be prevented from using the gym, the pool, the library, just to allow some elderly person in their 50's or above survive for a bit longer. Why can't they simply be given the choice? Isolate or die? (Nb. Obviously those having to rely on the NHS may not have the choice! No other healthcare provider in Europe have come close to their figures yet)


No it's not absurd at all.
Some of us clinically extremely vulnerable people aren't over 50, and we are both economically productive and have families.

Your laissez faire attitude is directly responsible for thousands of deaths.

To suggest that those over 50 have no value is, frankly, reminiscent of a certain moustached gentleman by the name of Adolf.


Of course it's absurd. If you're clinically vulnerable protect yourself via isolation. It's hardly my responsibility if you decide to go out and catch a disease. Obviously if people stand to close to me, I ensure they move (Nb. That woman standing 10" away from me to unload her shoping basket on Friday - but she was informed of the risk and kept a good few metres away from me after that). End of the day it's your choice, to compare it with Adolf who took that choice away from fit & healthy people, is a bit absurd

It's nothing like as simple as vulnerable protecting through self-isolation. e.g. Some vulnerable require care and those carers need to buy their own food etc. so immediately those in care are not able to fully isolate - all made far worse by the virus becoming widespread through the non-vulnerable taking taking the "freedoms" you seem to expect. And who will be working in care homes (and how will they survive when they can't go to a food shop as statistically many other customers there will have or have spread virus everywhere). The nature of our society is such that there will always be too much mixing to allow the virus to run free amongst any group.

Plus, C-19 can be a very serious disease even in the younger groups. Neurological damage, long term organ damage, etc. yet you you should be allowed to visit the gym, library, etc. and they just have to live with the consequences of your "freedom". You don't have to be in the "vulnerable" category so suffer devastating effects from C-19.

ian
mercalia
Posts: 14630
Joined: 22 Sep 2013, 10:03pm
Location: london South

Re: WInter 2020 : Covid-19 : 2nd Lockdown

Post by mercalia »

No wonder the state has so little money read this article from the BBC and be astonished and ashamed at what passes for govt in the UK

Go-between paid £21m in taxpayer funds for NHS PPE

No wonder the guy is smiling
Image

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54974373

makes me very angry more than I can say
And I doubt we would have heard about it than there is a court case in the USA.

The tory party should be forced to pay back the money to the UK state
User avatar
simonineaston
Posts: 8957
Joined: 9 May 2007, 1:06pm
Location: ...at a cricket ground

Re: WInter 2020 : Covid-19 : 2nd Lockdown

Post by simonineaston »

Jeeperz - I'm off to double-check my Glock's ready & got one in the chamber! Seriously, though - this sort of behaviour is typical of fin de siecle thinking ( so far as I can ascertain...). It just goes to underscore what I've said before, with my tongue only slightly rammed into my cheek, that is that any literate adult will have worked out that we are not long for this world (a rather ham-fisted phrase, in the sense that it's the world that's not long for us). The End, as the geezer's bill-board in London's West End used to advertise, is Nigh! In our semi & sub consiousnesses, we know it and are beginning to behave as if Nothing Matters Any More...
S
(on the look out for Armageddon, on board a Brompton nano & ever-changing Moultons)
User avatar
[XAP]Bob
Posts: 20306
Joined: 26 Sep 2008, 4:12pm

Re: Next lockdown, due to C19...

Post by [XAP]Bob »

gbnz wrote:
[XAP]Bob wrote:
gbnz wrote:It's absurd that I should be prevented from using the gym, the pool, the library, just to allow some elderly person in their 50's or above survive for a bit longer. Why can't they simply be given the choice? Isolate or die? (Nb. Obviously those having to rely on the NHS may not have the choice! No other healthcare provider in Europe have come close to their figures yet)


No it's not absurd at all.
Some of us clinically extremely vulnerable people aren't over 50, and we are both economically productive and have families.

Your laissez faire attitude is directly responsible for thousands of deaths.

To suggest that those over 50 have no value is, frankly, reminiscent of a certain moustached gentleman by the name of Adolf.


Of course it's absurd. If you're clinically vulnerable protect yourself via isolation. It's hardly my responsibility if you decide to go out and catch a disease. Obviously if people stand to close to me, I ensure they move (Nb. That woman standing 10" away from me to unload her shoping basket on Friday - but she was informed of the risk and kept a good few metres away from me after that).


How far do you think I should isolate, should I be allowed to talk to my kids or wife for instance?
Can I use the kitchen in my own house?
Should I have to leave everything outside for three days before I open my shopping?

I cannot protect myself - I rely on society to do what it can to reduce the risk to everyone, which includes reducing the risk to me.

In much the same way that cyclists can't protect themselves - they rely on other people moderating their behaviour in a way which is beneficial for society even though it is marginally detrimental to them.

End of the day it's your choice, to compare it with Adolf who took that choice away from fit & healthy people, is a bit absurd


The comparison with Hitler was a comment on your stated attitude that no-one over 50 has any value.




Going back to the "protect yourself by isolation" idea.
We pulled the kids out of school before the lockdown actually started, and I had only been out once in the week preceding that.
Our shopping was delivered to the garage, and we washed and disinfected everything that had to go into a fridge or freezer, and anything that could survive in the garage for was left there for at least three days, usually more.
All four of us isolated completely as a family - this meant that I didn't need to isolate from my wife and kids, since they weren't leaving the house either (at all, for anything).

7 weeks into that level of isolation (no-one entered or left the house at all, all incoming packages and letters were disinfected thoroughly and hands washed after handling them) we think I managed to catch covid. Since tests weren't available unless you were an inpatient, and if I didn't have it then that would have been the worst place to be... I can't say conclusively, but the Dr is pretty confident it was, and it certainly matches everything we know about it now.
My wife spent the nights literally counting my breaths with a watch in her hand - she had very strict guidelines from the GP as to what counted as "phone an ambulance" territory, and I was within one or two breaths a minute of that for much of several days.

Between mid February and September I left my house for three scheduled, shielded, blood tests and I went from my house to the car, to my parents house (they had filled their car completely, then isolated for three weeks) in order that my kids could go the their last few days of school - for one of them the last few days of primary school. That was the total count of excursions from our house - I was the *only* person who left the house, and I only did so for very specific, and very shielded purposes.
I used the fuelService app to have the car filled with fuel (wheelchair user, so filling the car is a pain at the best of times) meaning I didn't have any contact with the single person who did that for me (passed a card out of a cracked open back window, took it back into a wipe).

I would struggle to suggest anything that I/we could have done differently to isolate further than we did, so "protect yourself by isolation" just doesn't cut it. What is needed is *both* for me to isolate, *and* for you, and every other selfish prat in the country, to do their part as well.
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
User avatar
[XAP]Bob
Posts: 20306
Joined: 26 Sep 2008, 4:12pm

Re: WInter 2020 : Covid-19 : 2nd Lockdown

Post by [XAP]Bob »

peetee wrote:The restrictions imposed over the lockdown periods have been a right old mish-mash of rules and advice and it’s no surprise that a very large proportion of the population either don’t understand or have given up the will to do so.
It must be a difficult choice for the government, lead as it is by the highest priority; spending. Do they introduce draconian measures and loose money (ie taxes) by strangling business or do they relax measures and loose money by bailing out a spiralling NHS budget?



It's not a choice - the economy won't recover without the disease being under control.
What they did was staff money one of the very few industries that has very low costs to start/stop operating (hospitality), and is inherently an obvious massive transmission vector (no masks, enclosed space for extended time with employees walking back and forth between all the tables, still wearing no masks).

The only valid thing to do is to follow the scientific advice (and knowing medical professionals who report into sage, they have basically ignored it at every stage). This lockdown won't finish on the 2nd December, because BoJo waited so long before imposing it.
"open schools, but you have to shut something else" no, it'll be fine
"Now you're going to need a two week lockdown", it'll be fine
"Now you need a four week lockdown", dither for two weeks then grindingly do so...

Of course it's going to be longer...
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
Jdsk
Posts: 28024
Joined: 5 Mar 2019, 5:42pm

Re: WInter 2020 : Covid-19 : 2nd Lockdown

Post by Jdsk »

[XAP]Bob wrote:
peetee wrote:The restrictions imposed over the lockdown periods have been a right old mish-mash of rules and advice and it’s no surprise that a very large proportion of the population either don’t understand or have given up the will to do so.
It must be a difficult choice for the government, lead as it is by the highest priority; spending. Do they introduce draconian measures and loose money (ie taxes) by strangling business or do they relax measures and loose money by bailing out a spiralling NHS budget?

It's not a choice - the economy won't recover without the disease being under control.

This is the view of most of the economic experts that I've read. But that does say "economic experts" and not "politically motivated commentators".

Jonathan
User avatar
RickH
Posts: 5899
Joined: 5 Mar 2012, 6:39pm
Location: Horwich, Lancs.

Re: WInter 2020 : Covid-19 : 2nd Lockdown

Post by RickH »

Oldjohnw wrote:It's pretty obvious that 70 year olds should simply be put out of their misery. They are a burden on society. They are either so rich that they spend money and push prices up or so poor that they need state help paid for by taxpayers. There is nothing in between.

Schrodinger's pensioners? :D
Former member of the Cult of the Polystyrene Head Carbuncle.
Oldjohnw
Posts: 7764
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 4:23am
Location: South Warwickshire

Re: WInter 2020 : Covid-19 : 2nd Lockdown

Post by Oldjohnw »

Looks like it will be illegal to cross the border from midnight. Never thought that was about to happen.
John
User avatar
Mick F
Spambuster
Posts: 56390
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 11:24am
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall

Re: WInter 2020 : Covid-19 : 2nd Lockdown

Post by Mick F »

Close ALL borders.

Not allowed to cross any county border.
Mick F. Cornwall
User avatar
mjr
Posts: 20961
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: WInter 2020 : Covid-19 : 2nd Lockdown

Post by mjr »

Psamathe wrote:I think it is very difficult to maintain public support when even those at the top imply/perpetuate unproven myths. Today it's
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/nov/16/boris-johnson-forced-to-self-isolate-covid-19-symptoms wrote:Boris Johnson has said his body “is bursting with antibodies” after he was forced into self-isolation
implication that he's fine 'cos he's caught it before.

Cycle racing fans know this to be untrue because Gaviria seems to have caught it twice: https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-healt ... KKBN2761E8

Although that report says he is "one of a handful" confirmed cases, that's probably mainly because he was one of the first confirmed cases, having caught it in February in the United Arab Emirates who weren't messing about with their national cycling race and swiftly tested him. If he'd caught it in the United Kingdom back then, he wouldn't have been tested unless hospitalised - or maybe unless he was related to a cabinet minister.
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.
User avatar
simonineaston
Posts: 8957
Joined: 9 May 2007, 1:06pm
Location: ...at a cricket ground

Re: WInter 2020 : Covid-19 : 2nd Lockdown

Post by simonineaston »

Not specifically about Sars-C2 but a jolly good read never-the-less, here... great title, given two of my interests,
Pale Rider: The Spanish Flu and How It Changed The World
I've mentioned this before, but I'm still puzzled * by why this was such a colossal disaster, making The Great War appear small-beer by comparison, and yet ended up almost as a footnote in history...
* and several contributors to this very forum were thoughtful enough to attempt explanations.
S
(on the look out for Armageddon, on board a Brompton nano & ever-changing Moultons)
User avatar
mjr
Posts: 20961
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: WInter 2020 : Covid-19 : 2nd Lockdown

Post by mjr »

Oldjohnw wrote:Looks like it will be illegal to cross the border from midnight. Never thought that was about to happen.

Where does it look like that? Latest border story I saw is about allowing people to come here from five more faraway countries:
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-qua ... s-12136493
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.
Oldjohnw
Posts: 7764
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 4:23am
Location: South Warwickshire

Re: WInter 2020 : Covid-19 : 2nd Lockdown

Post by Oldjohnw »

mjr wrote:
Oldjohnw wrote:Looks like it will be illegal to cross the border from midnight. Never thought that was about to happen.

Where does it look like that? Latest border story I saw is about allowing people to come here from five more faraway countries:
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-qua ... s-12136493


https://www.itv.com/news/border/2020-11 ... 2-lockdown
John
Post Reply