Jdsk wrote:Were there any points from the BMA in addition to those mentioned in the recent posts above?
Thanks
Jonathan
My summary of the line you have taken is that those who understand this ( "the experts") are ok with delaying the second jab. This isn't an attempt to put words in anyone's mouth, just what I understood.
Now, AIUI, the BMA is the nearest thing doctors have to a trade union and may have various targets in its sights, but I assume that among the membership of the BMA there are plenty of people with plenty of expertise here. So, from my POV, this suggests that medics are not unanimously agreed that the delays is ok and the dissenters are not easily dismissed.