Re: Heat in the home
Posted: 25 Dec 2021, 10:44am
Pebble^^
Your experiment is working.
Keep going!
The curve will become less steep but it will continue to lose weight for a while.
The indoor piece of oak has lost 254 grams in 8 days.
So 4 pieces would have lost a litre, 8 pieces 2 litres, and so on.
A saucepanful thrown on the carpet, or perhaps better described as trickled over the hot wood-burner.
I see the outside piece latterly gained a bit of weight - wind driven rain?
The outside curve is slow too.
No wonder folk say you need to stack it a year or more.
The curve would be much steeper in dry hot summer conditions of course.
I think you are right about hard dense oak being around 35% moisture by weight.
(it is under normal outside drying conditions impossible to get all of it out.)
Some woods are considerably more in percentage terms though.
Many softwoods (and others) approach or can even exceed 50%.
And are of course considered by "quick dry Mick" to be poor fuel for obvious reasons.
Nothing could be further from the reality.
The pines (I mostly have here) make fantastic fuel wood.
While oak is considered by many to be a fine (finest?) fuel wood on account of it's dense long burning quality, I rate pine as a rather better cleaner burn.
Pine gets the Xmas oven really nice and hot!
Oak contains a lot of tannins, and without careful seasoning and hot burning makes a lot of flue tars fast.
It bears a bit more resemblance to a carbon rich fuel like coal and less of a hot-burning gas emitter.
((I might add I am exclusively wood fuelled, so I am using a LOT more than eight logs a DAY.
And I am not burning ANY on a bed of coal, or using coal to dry the wood, which I consider a pretty half hearted system.
Here is a low carbon, totally sustainable into the distant future system, and that includes some nicely regenerating old woodland and some new stands on poor ground.
It can of course be criticised on the basis of smoke emission but I do my best to avoid that (by seasoning fuel) and it's not much of an issue in darkest remotest rural Wales.
(Many (most?) farmers here burn old silage wrap. Yuk. It's vile practice, and an area better worthy of stricter controls.)
When I told my neighbour, a big sheep man, thirty odd years ago, that he would be glad one day of better regeneration of his "billiard table" grazed woodland floor, he was unsure. Oil was cheap then!
Now he is less critical !))
Nadolig Llawen i bob.
Your experiment is working.
Keep going!
The curve will become less steep but it will continue to lose weight for a while.
The indoor piece of oak has lost 254 grams in 8 days.
So 4 pieces would have lost a litre, 8 pieces 2 litres, and so on.
A saucepanful thrown on the carpet, or perhaps better described as trickled over the hot wood-burner.
I see the outside piece latterly gained a bit of weight - wind driven rain?
The outside curve is slow too.
No wonder folk say you need to stack it a year or more.
The curve would be much steeper in dry hot summer conditions of course.
I think you are right about hard dense oak being around 35% moisture by weight.
(it is under normal outside drying conditions impossible to get all of it out.)
Some woods are considerably more in percentage terms though.
Many softwoods (and others) approach or can even exceed 50%.
And are of course considered by "quick dry Mick" to be poor fuel for obvious reasons.
Nothing could be further from the reality.
The pines (I mostly have here) make fantastic fuel wood.
While oak is considered by many to be a fine (finest?) fuel wood on account of it's dense long burning quality, I rate pine as a rather better cleaner burn.
Pine gets the Xmas oven really nice and hot!
Oak contains a lot of tannins, and without careful seasoning and hot burning makes a lot of flue tars fast.
It bears a bit more resemblance to a carbon rich fuel like coal and less of a hot-burning gas emitter.
((I might add I am exclusively wood fuelled, so I am using a LOT more than eight logs a DAY.
And I am not burning ANY on a bed of coal, or using coal to dry the wood, which I consider a pretty half hearted system.
Here is a low carbon, totally sustainable into the distant future system, and that includes some nicely regenerating old woodland and some new stands on poor ground.
It can of course be criticised on the basis of smoke emission but I do my best to avoid that (by seasoning fuel) and it's not much of an issue in darkest remotest rural Wales.
(Many (most?) farmers here burn old silage wrap. Yuk. It's vile practice, and an area better worthy of stricter controls.)
When I told my neighbour, a big sheep man, thirty odd years ago, that he would be glad one day of better regeneration of his "billiard table" grazed woodland floor, he was unsure. Oil was cheap then!
Now he is less critical !))
Nadolig Llawen i bob.