I suggest rereading that criterion about the present state of information.Steady rider wrote: ↑21 Jan 2023, 11:54am ...
A belief that you should have a right to choose in helmet use can be seen in how it has affected people when this right is removed, people being discouraged from cycling, as an example New Zealand introduced a helmet law in 1994 and cycling levels reduced. For the period 1989–1990 to 2006–2009, survey data showed that average hours cycled per person reduced by 51%’ compared to before their helmet law.
The requirement to wear helmets does affect life choices in that all rides requiring their use can affect people with a conviction that they should be able to follow their belief in cycling without one."It must be a belief, and not an opinion or viewpoint based on the present state of information available."
Your final paragraph quoted after it above isn't relevant to that criterion.
And by introducing those data "based on the present state of information" you disqualify your "opinion or viewpoint" from being a protected belief.
Jonathan