But they do annoy and irritare which is their worthy intention.mattheus wrote: ↑26 Oct 2022, 3:17pmThat's a very worthy sentiment - nice to hear that you're concerned for the chap.reohn2 wrote: ↑26 Oct 2022, 3:09pmSorry my bad,it's Mikey innit or Mike van Erp to give him is full name.mattheus wrote: ↑26 Oct 2022, 9:39am
Who is MIckey?
I haven't read your whole post, but don't you think it's good that someone is standing up to those who "do as they please irrespective of the law or others,and it has to be said with or only slight repercussions for their actions."
I think it's good. Well done Mike van Erp!
The problem with placing yourself in front of idiots in cars is,sooner or later you'll come across a real head the ball who'll think they have the right to run over you.I thought I made that clear in my post.
If not is it any clearer for you now?
I was responding to your lengthy first sentence [now in bold] including the phrase "annoy and irritate" which doesn't seem very complimentary.
As I posted before my concern is for their's and Mikey's physical wellbeing up against entitled nutters who might just take things to the next level which could leave them maimed or worse.
Without doubt though my support would be no more than verbal and a vote,against a tide of a government that couldn't give a monkey's for global warming or law breaking road users who put other at risk,if they did things might be different.So, I do hope you support those who are prepared to give their time to combat the sort of people you describe there. Specfiically, those who "do as they please irrespective of the law or others,and it has to be said with or only slight repercussions for their actions."