Page 5 of 5
Re: Whither Parma ham
Posted: 14 Jul 2022, 8:23am
by Jdsk
simonineaston wrote: ↑13 Jul 2022, 6:37pm
ps French charcuterie industry in trouble just now with recent report blaming nitriles for high levels of sundry unpleasant diseases.
Linked upthread:
viewtopic.php?p=1708017#p1708017
: - )
Jonathan
Re: Whither Parma ham
Posted: 14 Jul 2022, 8:23am
by al_yrpal
The thread is really about preservatives...we could talk about kimchi and sauerkraut too
Some people seem to think its about not eating meat...a welcome bit of thread drift from very limited subject matter.
Al
Re: Whither Parma ham
Posted: 1 Aug 2022, 11:35pm
by Biospace
al_yrpal wrote: ↑14 Jul 2022, 8:23am
The thread is really about preservatives...we could talk about kimchi and sauerkraut too
Some people seem to think its about not eating meat...a welcome bit of thread drift from very limited subject matter.
Al
Original post:
ANTONISH wrote: ↑7 Jul 2022, 5:08pm
I like Parma ham - I don't eat a great deal of it but one advantage is that the only preservative is salt.
I have seen reports that the pigs involved are treated cruelly, pregnant sows kept in crates unable to turn round.
That put's me off the idea - I'm wondering if there is a British Parma ham alternative so that the UK animal welfare provisions apply.
I thought it was at least as much about animal welfare?
But since preservatives in the pork industry have been mentioned and red meat consumption so clearly linked to cancer, there's also the largely unmentioned drip-drip feed of antibiotics. I manage very well without them, to add them to my diet through meat eating doesn't appeal.
https://elifesciences.org/articles/74819
I seem to remember a political spat in 2006 when the EU were concerned the UK dairy industry wasn't sufficiently concerned with this,
https://www.standard.co.uk/hp/front/bri ... 04351.html
Re: Whither Parma ham
Posted: 2 Aug 2022, 10:26am
by Stoneybatter
.
Re: Whither Parma ham
Posted: 2 Aug 2022, 10:35am
by Jdsk
Biospace wrote: ↑1 Aug 2022, 11:35pmBut since preservatives in the pork industry have been mentioned and red meat consumption so clearly linked to cancer, there's also the largely unmentioned drip-drip feed of antibiotics. I manage very well without them, to add them to my diet through meat eating doesn't appeal.
https://elifesciences.org/articles/74819
I seem to remember a political spat in 2006 when the EU were concerned the UK dairy industry wasn't sufficiently concerned with this,
https://www.standard.co.uk/hp/front/bri ... 04351.html
I'm very concerned about the effects of overuse of antibiotics in food production on antimicrobial resistance. But much less about residual antibiotics in my diet.
What's the harm about which you're concerned... antimicrobial resistance occurring after dietary consumption of antibiotics by humans?
Thanks
Jonathan
Re: Whither Parma ham
Posted: 2 Aug 2022, 2:10pm
by Biospace
Jdsk wrote: ↑2 Aug 2022, 10:35am
Biospace wrote: ↑1 Aug 2022, 11:35pmBut since preservatives in the pork industry have been mentioned and red meat consumption so clearly linked to cancer, there's also the largely unmentioned drip-drip feed of antibiotics. I manage very well without them, to add them to my diet through meat eating doesn't appeal.
https://elifesciences.org/articles/74819
I seem to remember a political spat in 2006 when the EU were concerned the UK dairy industry wasn't sufficiently concerned with this,
https://www.standard.co.uk/hp/front/bri ... 04351.html
I'm very concerned about the effects of overuse of antibiotics in food production on antimicrobial resistance. But much less about residual antibiotics in my diet.
What's the harm about which you're concerned... antimicrobial resistance occurring after dietary consumption of antibiotics by humans?
Thanks
Jonathan
You use the word 'harm', I said that eating animals which have been routinely fed antibiotics doesn't appeal.
Why not? Primarily because it is actively supporting an industry which is helping create AMR and so for an increasingly large number of humans to die, but also because they're used to allow conditions to exist which would otherwise see large numbers of animals die. Meat from an animal which isn't naturally healthy is not my choice of food.
The government is very clear on withdrawing drugs before animal slaughter and before milk is returned for human consumption, to minimise residual antibiotics in food.
"
In studies conducted by Bates et al. (1994) and Kruse & Rorvik (1996), the authors found that the purchased raw chicken meat and chicken carcasses were a source of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (Enterococcus faecium) and concluded that the animals could serve as a source ofvancomycin-resistant enterococci that can enter the human food chain. https://www.agrojournal.org/26/03-24.pdf
Re: Whither Parma ham
Posted: 2 Aug 2022, 2:17pm
by Jdsk
Biospace wrote: ↑2 Aug 2022, 2:10pm
Jdsk wrote: ↑2 Aug 2022, 10:35am
Biospace wrote: ↑1 Aug 2022, 11:35pmBut since preservatives in the pork industry have been mentioned and red meat consumption so clearly linked to cancer, there's also the largely unmentioned drip-drip feed of antibiotics. I manage very well without them, to add them to my diet through meat eating doesn't appeal.
https://elifesciences.org/articles/74819
I seem to remember a political spat in 2006 when the EU were concerned the UK dairy industry wasn't sufficiently concerned with this,
https://www.standard.co.uk/hp/front/bri ... 04351.html
I'm very concerned about the effects of overuse of antibiotics in food production on antimicrobial resistance. But much less about residual antibiotics in my diet.
What's the harm about which you're concerned... antimicrobial resistance occurring after dietary consumption of antibiotics by humans?
You use the word 'harm', I said that eating animals which have been routinely fed antibiotics doesn't appeal.
Why not? Primarily because it is actively supporting an industry which is helping create AMR and so for an increasingly large number of humans to die, but also because they're used to allow conditions to exist which would otherwise see large numbers of animals die. Meat from an animal which isn't naturally healthy is not my choice of food.
The government is very clear on withdrawing drugs before animal slaughter and before milk is returned for human consumption.
Thanks.
It was the "add them to my diet through meat eating doesn't appeal" that led me to think that you were concerned about harm from them being in your diet.
I share your concern about animal welfare and about antimicrobial resistance from overuse of antibiotics in food production.
Jonathan
Re: Whither Parma ham
Posted: 2 Aug 2022, 2:33pm
by Biospace
Jdsk wrote: ↑2 Aug 2022, 2:17pm
Thanks.
It was the "add them to my diet through meat eating doesn't appeal" that led me to think that you were concerned about harm from them being in your diet.
I share your concern about animal welfare and about antimicrobial resistance from overuse of antibiotics in food production.
Jonathan
Yes, the predictions are in the order of millions of excess deaths of humans, every year, from antibiotic resistant bacteria.
We're back in the territory of economics and economic advantage, unless we apply tariffs to food products from countries with less stringent practices. Routine use of antibiotics leads to more profit and cheaper meat, so
ceteris paribus in a free market the producers more concerned with animal welfare go out of business.
Fortunately, welfare levels and meat quality do correlate, plus there is a small but increasing public awareness of food and its origins.
Is there much science relating to long-term, very low level (food residue) antibiotic consumption?
Re: Whither Parma ham
Posted: 3 Aug 2022, 9:10am
by ANTONISH
The reason I started this post was because I found that the Parma ham I was consuming (in large part because of salt being the only preserving agent) was associated with animal cruelty,
I'm looking for a similar but "kinder" product.
It's very difficult to find any preserved meat product that doesn't contain nitrates - the "Wiltshire" ham mentioned upthread as I understand it refers to a process rather than a geographical area.
I don't think the labelling requirements extend to mentioning whether antibiotics have been used and I'm aware that in the past there has been extensive and sometimes illegal antibiotic use - presumably this could apply to all meat products.
Unfortunately my vegetable consumption is generally limited to an accompaniment to meat and fish - in that I find it OK but I don't fancy a plate of vegetables alone.
Re: Whither Parma ham
Posted: 3 Aug 2022, 10:12am
by al_yrpal
Yes, I suggested Wiltshire ham because from what I read its only preservative is salt but reading packet ingredients it appears that some suppliers are using nitrates too...naughty!
Personally I am relaxed about eating practically anything because of UK food regulations. Danger comes when one consumes large quantities of anything and with our highly varied diet and absence of allergies we just dont.
Al
Re: Whither Parma ham
Posted: 3 Aug 2022, 1:47pm
by Biospace
ANTONISH wrote: ↑3 Aug 2022, 9:10am
The reason I started this post was because I found that the Parma ham I was consuming (in large part because of salt being the only preserving agent) was associated with animal cruelty,
I'm looking for a similar but "kinder" product.
It's very difficult to find any preserved meat product that doesn't contain nitrates - the "Wiltshire" ham mentioned upthread as I understand it refers to a process rather than a geographical area.
I don't think the labelling requirements extend to mentioning whether antibiotics have been used and I'm aware that in the past there has been extensive and sometimes illegal antibiotic use - presumably this could apply to all meat products.
Unfortunately my vegetable consumption is generally limited to an accompaniment to meat and fish - in that I find it OK but I don't fancy a plate of vegetables alone.
Broadly speaking, meat with Soil Association organic status will be from animals with better living conditions and better diet, it's possible to buy ham and bacon which are free of nitrates and nitrites.
https://www.coombefarmorganic.co.uk/buy ... ked-gammon
https://www.finnebrogue.com/naked-roi/o ... naked-ham/
Re: Whither Parma ham
Posted: 4 Aug 2022, 2:33pm
by Jdsk
Biospace wrote: ↑2 Aug 2022, 2:33pmIs there much science relating to long-term, very low level (food residue) antibiotic consumption?
The most obvious risks are sensitivity, toxicity, and development of antimicrobial resistance.
The first two are not common clinical problems.
Development of antimicrobial resistance caused by dietary consumption by humans could occur in the gut or in sewage. Historically it wasn't always clear where resistance arose but that is no longer the case with current surveillance. Neither of these has identified dietary consumption as a contributor in the reports that I have read. Similarly reducing the risk from dietary consumption doesn't figure in any action plans of which I am aware.
Jonathan
The UK's current action plan: "Tackling antimicrobial resistance 2019–2024":
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... n_plan.pdf
Re: Whither Parma ham
Posted: 4 Aug 2022, 2:41pm
by Jdsk
al_yrpal wrote: ↑3 Aug 2022, 10:12amPersonally I am relaxed about eating practically anything because of UK food regulations. Danger comes when one consumes large quantities of anything and with our highly varied diet and absence of allergies we just dont.
Food regulations are necessary but not sufficient to reduce risks to health from food and drink. They don't address deficiency, such as vitamin D, or excess, such as total energy intake or alcohol intake.
The relevant English advice for consumption of processed meat is in:
"Meat in your diet":
https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/eat-well/f ... nutrition/
and
"Red meat and the risk of bowel cancer":
https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/eat-well/f ... el-cancer/
and includes:
How much red and processed meat should we eat?
Red meat (such as beef, lamb and pork) can form part of a healthy diet. But eating a lot of red and processed meat probably increases your risk of bowel (colorectal) cancer.
Processed meat refers to meat that has been preserved by smoking, curing, salting or adding preservatives. This includes sausages, bacon, ham, salami and pâtés.
If you currently eat more than 90g (cooked weight) of red or processed meat a day, the Department of Health and Social Care advises that you cut down to 70g.
90g is equivalent to around 3 thinly cut slices of beef, lamb or pork, where each slice is about the size of half a piece of sliced bread. A cooked breakfast containing 2 typical British sausages and 2 rashers of bacon is equivalent to 130g.
For more information, read Red meat and the risk of bowel cancer.
Jonathan
Re: Whither Parma ham
Posted: 4 Aug 2022, 2:59pm
by al_yrpal
Thanks for the lecture but anyone at the age of 80 with any brain cells will know all about the dangers of alcohol red meat, processed meat, benefits of seafood and avoiding overconsumption of potentially damaging food and drink. Very happy with my healthy diet.
Al
Re: Whither Parma ham
Posted: 4 Aug 2022, 3:50pm
by Biospace
Jdsk wrote: ↑4 Aug 2022, 2:33pm
Biospace wrote: ↑2 Aug 2022, 2:33pmIs there much science relating to long-term, very low level (food residue) antibiotic consumption?
The most obvious risks are sensitivity, toxicity, and development of antimicrobial resistance.
The first two are not common clinical problems.
Development of antimicrobial resistance caused by dietary consumption by humans could occur in the gut or in sewage. Historically it wasn't always clear where resistance arose but that is no longer the case with current surveillance. Neither of these has identified dietary consumption as a contributor in the reports that I have read. Similarly reducing the risk from dietary consumption doesn't figure in any action plans of which I am aware.
Jonathan
Thanks.
HMG is very clear about antibiotic and other drug residues in meat, over the last few years matters have slowly improved across the industry.
"
The legislation aims to protect consumers by stopping unacceptable levels or concentrations of residues from veterinary medicines getting into the food chain. Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) and withdrawal periods are set as part of achieving this objective."
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/managing-li ... -medicines
From personal experience of a dairy farm which moved from conventional to organic practices, antibiotic use was reduced by a factor of nearly 4, while the number of days milk wasn't permitted into the human food chain following treatment increased by a factor of 4 or 5 (can't remember which).