jois wrote: ↑26 Sep 2022, 12:32pm
Nether of us is in a position to know which level of Brexit was acceptable to most of the people who voted for it, a softer Brexit would quite probably be more acceptable to those that didn't. But looser don't generally get to set the rules.
We're all losers at the moment, barring a small group of disaster capitalists. As for knowing, we do know as there were extensive surveys and polling done and that are still being done about it, including the much more rigorously conducted British Election Study before anyone comes up with 'but polls are always wrong' garbage.
Being bound by decisions we couldn't vote against is undemocratic of the first order.
Welcome to the reality of a global world. That applies to us even now, the only way not to be bound by such decisions is to go full North Korea. Everything else is a sliding scale of pooling sovereignty for economic benefits. As it is, we're constrained from doing anything wildly different even not as a member of the single market due to simply living next to it and being only a 6th of the size economically. It would be better to actually have the full economic benefits. It would obviously be better still to have a say.
jois wrote: ↑26 Sep 2022, 12:32pm
Increasing the money supply in the economy is Keynesian and that's what tax cuts do. There are other ways of doing that.
That's a very loose definition of Keynesian and doesn't really fit with what he said given he was rather more nuanced on both the timing of such increases and the methods.
As for the money supply, there isn't a shortage of money at the moment so increasing it is not a good idea and why the markets have responded by selling £s and divesting out of uk gilts, the rates of which have risen considerably and are in emerging economy territory.
jois wrote: ↑26 Sep 2022, 12:10pm
NB the complete deregulation of the city and banker bonuses of eye watering proportions such that it lead to financial disaster was a Labour party plan.
Labour's governance had led to the UK being in a weaker position to deal with the fallout but the trigger of the disaster was far more global and predominantly the US sub prime market which was in a more precarious state than ours. It's worth bearing in mind that shortly before the crash, the conservatives were hounding the government for not deregulating enough and to cut taxes.
Maybe cross wires but I don't see not reversing Brexit and improving our exports to the EU as mutually exclusive
Suggest some reading on non tariff barriers etc. Being outside CU & SM has been devastating for exports, particularly for SMEs that don't have the lack the scale and multinational element assist in working around the issue. The continual queue at dover isn't exactly helpful either...