If the job and salary were so good then why aren't there a queue of doctors wanting to be GPs,you'd think there'd a surgery on every street corner?
Strange anomaly is that.......
If the job and salary were so good then why aren't there a queue of doctors wanting to be GPs,you'd think there'd a surgery on every street corner?
In England recruitment is so difficult that there is a system of bonus payments for trainees in general practice.
Looks more like a "wish list" with nothing really about how they are going to achieve much. There some worrying bits e.g. "maximise the use of the independent sector". And no indication as to how they are going to achieve their ambitious recruitment plans when previous Conservative Governments have completely failed.Jdsk wrote: ↑22 Sep 2022, 1:37pmThe plan:Jdsk wrote: ↑22 Sep 2022, 12:37pmBacktracked on the guarantee... and the plan hasn't been published yet!
https://www.theguardian.com/society/202 ... -sanctions
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... r-patients
Jonathan
Quite!Jdsk wrote: ↑22 Sep 2022, 3:37pmIn England recruitment is so difficult that there is a system of bonus payments for trainees in general practice.
"Targeted Enhanced Recruitment Scheme (TERS)":
https://medical.hee.nhs.uk/medical-trai ... ent-scheme
Jonathan
PS: Having said that retention is even more important and problematic than recruitment.
Correction - Wes Streeting spoke with energy and fluency, I think. Thanks for the link.Meanhwile, I just hope the Labour party improves on their current lack-lustre performance...
I read that adherance to the core principles of neoliberalism (Truss, her chancellor, JR-M et al are firmly wedded to this ideology, although you'd be forgiven for not knowing that - it's not much talked about...) is all about morality. The theory goes that the market is amoral (as opposed to immoral) and so, treats everybody the same. To each goes their just deserts. Neoliberalism tells us that articificially making allowances for the poor and the weak spoils everything and makes a mess of it all. Which is fine if you're well off and a bit rubbish if you need help.I actually find the scraping the top income tax rate quite immoral.
Which reminds me of Iansimonineaston wrote: ↑23 Sep 2022, 11:10amI read that adherance to the core principles of neoliberalism (Truss, her chancellor, JR-M et al are firmly wedded to this ideology, although you'd be forgiven for not knowing that - it's not much talked about...) is all about morality. The theory goes that the market is amoral (as opposed to immoral) and so, treats everybody the same. To each goes their just deserts. Neoliberalism tells us that articificially making allowances for the poor and the weak spoils everything and makes a mess of it all. Which is fine if you're well off and a bit rubbish if you need help.I actually find the scraping the top income tax rate quite immoral.
Ask a thousand folk on zero hour contracts if they think neoliberalism is a good idea and to tell you how well they are doing under the scheme, and I imagine you'll get hundreds of unprintable responses - - but that's OK 'cos the markets wil have treated everybody with blind equality...
Media reports suggest the staunch Brexiter had pocketed at least £7m in dividends from Somerset since the EU referendum in 2016, and before he stopped taking a salary, Rees-Mogg received about £15,000 a month from the firm on top of his MP’s pay
Somerset has traditionally invested in listed companies based in emerging markets including China, Korea, India and Mexico, and is believed to have benefited from the drop in the value of the pound after the Brexit vote as its holdings were overseas..
So he profited from Brexit!His payouts from Somerset have continued, despite being a so-called sleeper shareholder who no longer plays a role in advising on the investment strategy or the running of the business. Rees-Mogg reportedly received dividends worth at least £600,000 last year, according to the Times, though that was down from £800,000 a year earlier due to a 35% slide in the profits, linked in part to an emerging markets sell-off.
I doubt many, if any, employed GPs earn that sort of money. Where did the figure come from?