Also, if she had a truthful defence she'd be using it, making sure all the Press had her defence. Instead she is just evasive and fails to answer the specific relevant questions - and from that one can only asume she did what the Press are reporting.pete75 wrote: ↑27 May 2023, 11:43amNot bullied but held to account.Pebble wrote: ↑27 May 2023, 10:23amI would like to see more context around this. Did she simply say to someone in the office "do you know if you can have a one on one course?" or did she demand a full written report into all the possibilities of what would be least damaging. If the later, then I would agree that would be wrong.Psamathe wrote: ↑27 May 2023, 10:09am
The problem is it appears that she asked the Civil Servants to investigate the "private speeding course" and using Civil Servants for personal matters is against the Ministerial Code and breaking that code is a resignation/sacking offence.
That said seems it isn't the first time she's broken the Ministerial Code and she seems to regard herself as "above" such rules and reality is, weak leadership seems to mean she is.
Ian
It appears the long knives are out for her, and everything she does or says is blown out of all proportion. She is being relentlessly bullied so care needs to be taken into what to believe.
Ian