Disc Brakes On A Tourer

For discussions about bikes and equipment.
andymiller
Posts: 1716
Joined: 8 Dec 2007, 10:26am

Post by andymiller »

I've heard lots of people on STW whinging about lots of things to do with disc brakes, but I've never heard people complaining about discs warping.
User avatar
andrew_s
Posts: 5869
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 9:29pm
Location: Gloucestershire

Post by andrew_s »

I went on an Alpine tour with a friend on a disc-equipped 26" wheel touring bike, loaded with camping gear. Major descents were Rousset, Grimone, Ornon, (Alpe d'Huez unladen), Croix-de-fer, Galibier/Lauteret, Izoard, Vars and Bonette.

His descending style was plummet and stop (nearly), and there was no problem with the discs overheating. I'm not sure, but I think the brakes were Hope.
He did however have to spend a day in Briancon sourcing a new set of forks after the disc brake ejected the front wheel (no lawyer lips).
User avatar
Phil_Lee
Posts: 726
Joined: 13 Jul 2008, 3:41am
Location: Cambs

Post by Phil_Lee »

That seems like a good argument for mounting the calliper in front of the forks, rather than behind.
That way the brake application pushes the wheel into the dropout.
User avatar
CJ
Posts: 3423
Joined: 15 Jan 2007, 9:55pm

Post by CJ »

andrew_s wrote:I went on an Alpine tour with a friend on a disc-equipped 26" wheel touring bike ... His descending style was plummet and stop (nearly), and there was no problem with the discs overheating.

Plummet and stop minimises brake heating in more ways than one, since it maximises aerodynamic drag and cooling. It is the best way to descend, whatever sort of brake you have.

There's two sorts of rider who want discs on the road: those who want the highest tech befitting their high cycling skills and self image, and those from the opposite end of the skill spectrum who want a technological fix for their fear of losing control. The first group are not much problem, they'll go fast enough to make the wind do most of the braking. But we've all met riders who creep down hills with their brakes on the whole time, who wear out pads and rims much faster than us, with consequent equipment failures that make them all the more cautious.

It's the cautious descenders I worry about. To see if discs are safe for those riders I'd want to test them by riding down a 1000m descent with brakes on the whole way. We all know one shouldn't, but's what those riders will do. We know what happens when they do it on rim brakes. They have problems but they're managable. Boiled brake fluid isn't as easy to replace at the roadside and with something like 100 different designs of disc pads out there (against three designs of rim brake block) replacements can be hard to find.
Chris Juden
One lady owner, never raced or jumped.
User avatar
Bren
Posts: 59
Joined: 30 May 2007, 2:57pm
Location: Manchester

Post by Bren »

Phil_Lee wrote:That seems like a good argument for mounting the calliper in front of the forks, rather than behind.
That way the brake application pushes the wheel into the dropout.


I think Cotic do that on the Roadrat.
Ambermile
Posts: 335
Joined: 26 Jun 2008, 3:35pm
Location: South Norfolk
Contact:

Post by Ambermile »

CJ wrote:
There's two sorts of rider who want discs on the road: those who want the highest tech befitting their high cycling skills and self image, and those from the opposite end of the skill spectrum who want a technological fix for their fear of losing control.




There *is* a third you know... the ones that bought new forks without checking for V-brake compatibility :oops:

Arthur
I make stuff, that's all.
Post Reply